Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dodson Family Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$58kEducation$52kHealth$40kReligion$25kFood & Nutrition$24kAnimals$22kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$776k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Volunteer State College Fd$10,000
Habitat For Humanity Restore$7,000
Gallatin Cares$7,000
Volunteer Equine Advocates$7,000
Gallatin Day Care Ctr Inc$7,000
Gallatin Shalom Zone$5,000
Feed Sumner Food Bank$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Gallatin Day Care Ctr Inc: $7k → 8%Gallatin Cares: $7k → 8%Gallatin Day Care Ctr Inc: $6k → 8%Gallatin Day Care Ctr Inc: $5k → 8%Gallatin Day Care Ctr Inc: $5k → 8%Gallatin Cares: $2k → 8%Gallatin Day Care Ctr Inc: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$140k · 6 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against -29% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$140k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
-29%

Still filing today

83%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GD
    GALLATIN DAY CARE CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $25k · revenue +3%
  • GS
    GALLATIN SHALOM ZONE INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $24k · revenue +251%
  • VE
    VOLUNTEER EQUINE ADVOCATES
    4× · 2020–2024 · $22k · revenue +383%

Funded once

  • SM
    St Margaret's Episcopal Church
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • HF
    Habitat for Humanity
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -29%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gallatin Senior Citizens Center Inc

To provide activities and opportunities to enrich the lives of the senior citizens in the area

Human Services
2
Gallatin Child Care Center Inc

Child care for low income families

Education
3
The Samaritan Center Inc

To meet the basic physical, spiritual, and social need of people in our area using the ministry of Jesus as a model.

Religion
4
Albert Gallatin Human Service Agency Inc

Senior citizen programs through the area agency on aging which provides a center, services, congregate meals and home delivery meals.

Human Services
5
Gallatin Chamber Foundation

The gallatin chamber foundation is the gallatin area chamber of commerce's 501(c)3 component to encourage, promote, and support innovative enhancement projects and creative initiatives within the city of gallatin.

Community Improvement
6
Galilee Community Development Corp

To provide and restore affordable housing for low to moderate income residents throughout the concho valley

Housing & Shelter
7
Grace Resource Center Inc

To provide food, shelter, clothing, medical assistance and other immediate need to the thousands of needy and homeless people living in our area.

Housing & Shelter
8
Greater Chattanooga Christian Services Inc

Provide Group and Foster care for Homeless Children and Counseling

Human Services
9
Homesafe of Sumner Wilson and Robertson Counties

Homesafe provides safe, temorary shelter, and support services for indivduals who have suffered or have been threatened with emotional or physical abuse.

Human Services
10
Habitat for Humanity of Gallatin Valley Inc

To provide housing to low and very low income families that qualify.

Housing & Shelter
11
Galilee Center Inc

To fulfill the needs of the underprivileged and disadvantaged by providing food, clothing, and other basic needs and affirm their dignity with love, compassion and respect.

Human Services
12
Gadsden-Etowah Habitat for Humanity

Construction of Residential Housing for Low-income families

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gallatin Shalom Zone Inc; the most unlike its peers is Volunteer Equine Advocates. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VOLUNTEER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherVOLUNTEER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATIONSt Margaret's Episcopal Church: $25,000 · OtherSt Margaret's Episcopal ChurchSumner County Food Bank: $20,000 · OtherSumner County Food BankHabitat For Humanity Restore: $7,000 · OtherHabitat For Humanity Restore+5 more: $15,000 · Other+5 moreSALVUS CENTER INC: $40,000 · HealthSALVUS CENTER INCGALLATIN DAY CARE CENTER INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesGALLATIN DAY CAR…GALLATIN CARES: $9,000 · Human ServicesGALLATIN CARESGALLATIN SHALOM ZONE INC: $24,000 · Community ImprovementGALLATIN SH…VOLUNTEER EQUINE ADVOCATES: $22,000 · AnimalsVOLUNTEER …
Other$117,000Health$40,000Human Services$34,000Community Improvement$24,000Animals$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVOLUNTEER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetSALVUS CENTER INC: $40,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetGALLATIN DAY CARE CENTER INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGALLATIN SHALOM ZONE INC: $24,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetVOLUNTEER EQUINE ADVOCATES: $22,000 over 4y, 9.5% of budgetGALLATIN CARES: $9,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHabitat for Humanity: $3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VOLUNTEER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SALVUS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GALLATIN DAY CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GALLATIN SHALOM ZONE INC ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER EQUINE ADVOCATES ↗
  • Who funds GALLATIN CARES ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds Literacy Council of Sumner County ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Memorial Foundation IncTN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Memorial Foundation Inc · The Goodall Family Foundation · Carolyn Smith Foundation · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dodson Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dodson Family Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dodson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph