Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dodds Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$308k
Granted FY2020
4
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2020.

Philanthropy$308kReligion$13kHealth$13kHuman Services$10kEducation$1kEmployment$750Recreation & Sports$500Crime & Legal$500Other$0
02FY2020 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$76,971
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DODDS FAMILY DONOR FUND - AMERICAN ENDOWMENT #3379$76,971
MARGARET MARY CHARITABLE FUND - AMERICAN ENDOWMENT #9176$76,971
WILLIAM AND TAMMY TODDS GIVING FUND - FIDELITY CHARITABLE #3379$76,971
DODDS FAMILY FUND - AMERICAN ENDOWMENT #9155$76,971
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WORKING WARDROBES: $500 → 10%IMMACULATE HEART COMMUNITY: $1k → 10%JACOBS AND CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $500 → 11%MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF LOS ANGELES: $250 → 14%ST JUDE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $3k → 18%REDWOODS MONASTERY: $900 → 18%CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $200 → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $400 → 27%KIDS IN NEED OF DEFENSE: $500 → 14%SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS: $4k → 13%MARGARET MARY CHARITABLE FUND - AMERICAN ENDOWMENT #9176: $77k → 13%WORKING WARDROBES: $250 → 10%SCHOOL OF THE MADELEINE: $500 → 10%MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF LOS ANGELES: $250 → 14%ST JUDE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $3k → 18%REDWOODS MONASTERY: $500 → 18%CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $200 → 17%SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS: $500 → 13%DODDS FAMILY DONOR FUND - AMERICAN ENDOWMENT #3379: $77k → 13%LITERACY VOLUNTEERS HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY: $500 → 10%SCHOOL OF THE MADELEINE: $250 → 10%BEACON HOUSE ASSN OF SAN PEDRO: $250 → 14%DODDS FAMILY FUND - AMERICAN ENDOWMENT #9155: $77k → 13%CHURCH OF ST MARY MAGDALEN: $150 → 10%USC NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER: $250 → 14%FRIENDS OF TUOLOMNE CAMP: $300 → 10%BEACON HOUSE OF ASSN OF SAN PEDRO: $250 → 14%FRIENDS OF TUOLUMNE CAMP: $200 → 10%THE TREVOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MISSION SAN JOSE: $500 → 10%PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK: $11k → 14%DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MISSION SAN JOSE: $400 → 10%CASA FRANCISCA: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

4%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15k · 9 repeat orgs$333k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2020, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

$15k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+195%

Still filing today

44%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $308k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20
HealthCivil RightsFood & NutritionCrime & LegalEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JUDE CATHOLIC CHURCH
    2× · 2018–2019 · $5k
  • SO
    SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS
    2× · 2018–2019 · $5k
  • RA
    REDWOODS ABBEY
    2× · 2018–2019 · $1k

Funded once

  • PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue +1%
  • CF
    CASA FRANCISCA
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • IH
    IMMACULATE HEART COMMUNITYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +195%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
2
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
3
Center for Conflict Resolution

The mission of the organization (ccr) shall be to work with individuals, communities, courts, and other institutions to manage and resolve conflict.

Crime & Legal
4
The Way Back Inc

To provide rehabilitative housing services and support to help people with psychiatric disabilities reintegrate into the community.the agency provides rehabilitative housing services and staff support as a primary mechanism for achieving…

Human Services
5
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
6
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
7
Citizens Commission On Human Rights

The citizens commission on human rights (cchr) is a non-profit, non-political, non-religious mental health industry watchdog whose mission is to eradicate abuses committed under the guise of mental health. we work to ensure patient and…

International
8
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
9
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
10
Impact Community Action Partnership Inc

Reducing the barriers and burdens that families in poverty experience by increasing access to essential needs.

—
11
Liberty Justice Center

To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…

Crime & Legal
12
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Constitutional Rights; the most unlike its peers is Working Wardrobes for a New Start. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DODDS FAMILY FUND - AMERICAN ENDOWMENT #9155: $76,971 · OtherDODDS FAMILY FUND - AMERICAN ENDOWMENT #9155WILLIAM AND TAMMY TODDS GIVING FUND - FIDELITY CHARITABLE #3379: $76,971 · OtherWILLIAM AND TAMMY TODDS GIVING FUND - FIDELITY CHARITABLE #3379MARGARET MARY CHARITABLE FUND - AMERICAN ENDOWMENT #9176: $76,971 · OtherMARGARET MARY CHARITABLE FUND - AMERICAN ENDOWMENT #9176DODDS FAMILY DONOR FUND - AMERICAN ENDOWMENT #3379: $76,971 · OtherDODDS FAMILY DONOR FUND - AMERICAN ENDOWMENT #3379+14 more: $25,850 · Other+14 morePANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $11,000 · HealthTHE BEACON HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF SAN PEDRO: $500 · HealthTREVOR PROJECT INC: $500 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $400 · Civil RightsWorking Wardrobes For A New Start: $750 · EmploymentJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $500 · Food & NutritionKIND INC: $500 · Crime & Legal
Other$333,734Health$11,500Civil Rights$900Employment$750Food & Nutrition$500Crime & Legal$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMMACULATE HEART COMMUNITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorking Wardrobes For A New Start: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF LOS ANGELES: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BEACON HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF SAN PEDRO: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds IMMACULATE HEART COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds Working Wardrobes For A New Start ↗
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds KIND INC ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BEACON HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF SAN PEDRO ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dodds Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dodds Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dodds Family Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Dodds Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dodds Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph