· Private foundation
Dkg Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALPHA USA | $25,000 |
| RIVERBEND CHURCH | $25,000 |
| THE LIFE CONNECTION INC | $9,164 |
| MISC CHARITIES (UNDER 1000) | $6,250 |
| CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK | $2,000 |
| ENTRUST | $2,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $2,000 |
| AUSTIN DISASTER RELIEF NETWORK | $2,000 |
| STAR FISH KENYA | $2,000 |
| MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER | $1,000 |
| MOBIL LOAVES AND FISHES | $1,000 |
| OLAM DAMASCUS REENTRY PROGRAM | $1,000 |
| GALILEE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH | $1,000 |
| DALE ROGERS TRAINING CENTER | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 18% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- AUAlpha USA4× · 2020–2025 · $153k · revenue +145%
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC5× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +39%- SKStarfish Kenya Inc5× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMYone grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
To train pastors/leaders in africa who have little or no formal training and resources. teach them how to study and prepare bible-based messages using the thompson chain reference study bible and to provide bible to trained pastors/leaders.
Training pastors and leaders in christian faith
International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures
CTNs mission is to partner with national churches to economically and effectively train large numbers of Christian leaders in their calling character and ministry competency so that local communities of faith remain biblical faithful and…
To produce and publish training materials for church leadership and development. To facilitate churches groups and individual participation in world mission.
"T-NET" stands for the "Training Network" for Disciplemaking Churches. T-NET is an international Christian training organization. Its mission is "To return the church to its disciplemaking roots, worldwide".
Christian leaders from africa promotes christian theological training & education of local leaders in kenya and throughout africa. it invests in undergraduate, masters, and phd scholarships, faculty support for african professors and…
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Alpha USA ↗
- Who funds THE LIFE CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN DISASTER RELIEF NETWORK ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds Starfish Kenya Inc ↗
- Who funds ENTRUST ↗
- Who funds DALE ROGERS TRAINING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Dkg Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dkg Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Dale Rogers Training Center Inc: 79% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Dkg Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Dkg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Dkg’s filings →