Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dirshu International Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$612k
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$442k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Science & Tech$1.8MReligion$1.2MEducation$200kHuman Services$15kPhilanthropy$5kHealth$1kYouth Development$450
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k36 grants · $89k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $81k
  • $250k+1 grant · $442k
$1,200
Median grant
3
States reached
$14k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$442,395
Individual grant recipient$27,205
Yeshivas Stolin Karlin$25,000
Individual grant recipient$18,600
Yeshiva Keren Orah$10,000
Talmud Torah Bais Avrohom$9,500
Individual grant recipient$9,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
Meoros Bais Yaakov$6,500
Individual grant recipient$6,350
Individual grant recipient$6,100
Ezras Yisrael$5,250
Mesivta Shevet Halevi$4,800
Congregation Pre Ahron$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Misaskim: $8k → 20%Misaskim: $8k → 20%A Time: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 37 repeat orgs$171k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
39

Total granted

$3.1M
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+38%

Still filing today

30%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $75k · revenue +48%
  • BT
    BAIS TOVA INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $52k · revenue +70%
  • YO
    YESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $38k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • CS
    Congregation Shaarei Tefilah
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • MP
    MACHON PRI EITZ CHAIM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +194%
  • CK
    CONGREGATION KESSER BAIS YAAKOV
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood Inc

Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.

Education
2
Yeshiva Toras Chaim Inc

The organization operates a religious/parochial high school and college in lakewood, nj.

Unclassified
3
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
4
Masores Bnos Yisroel Inc

Masores bnos yisroel is a religious elementary school providing quality education for the children of lakewood nj.

Education
5
Cheder Toras Zev

Cheder toras zev operates a parochial grade school in lakewood, new jersey.

Education
6
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah-Yeshivat Mizrachi Lbanim

A school-section 170(b)(1)(a)(ii), operating from the preschool pre-k level through high school, and chartered ny the new york state education department and board of regents.

Education
7
Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
8
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
9
Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
10
Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To provide religious Jewish education.

Education
11
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
12
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Misaskim Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $2,275,012 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+80 more: $686,955 · Other+80 moreLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $74,661 · EducationBAIS TOVA INC: $52,075 · EducationYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $38,085 · EducationTALMUD TORAH BAIS AVROHOM INC: $29,368 · EducationBAIS SHAINDEL: $22,750 · EducationMESIVTA OHR YISROEL INC: $9,000 · Education+8 more: $12,250 · EducationMACHON PRI EITZ CHAIM INC: $10,000 · ReligionRUACH CHAIM INC: $5,900 · ReligionCAMP DEGEL HATORAH INC: $2,150 · ReligionYESHIVA SHAAREI OORAH INC: $1,000 · ReligionTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · ReligionMISASKIM CORP: $15,000 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $1,000 · Human ServicesCHEVRA-KADISHA YERUSHALAYIM INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyZICHRON CHAIM INC: $450 · Youth Development
Other$2,961,967Education$238,189Religion$20,050Human Services$16,000Philanthropy$5,000Youth Development$450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $74,661 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBAIS TOVA INC: $52,075 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $38,085 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTALMUD TORAH BAIS AVROHOM INC: $29,368 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetBAIS SHAINDEL: $22,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBAIS MEDRASH MAYAN HATORAH: $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMACHON PRI EITZ CHAIM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetMESIVTA OHR YISROEL INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMEOROS BAIS YAAKOV INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRUACH CHAIM INC: $5,900 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHEVRA-KADISHA YERUSHALAYIM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP DEGEL HATORAH INC: $2,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC: $1,820 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA SHAAREI ARAZIM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INC: $860 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA TORAS ARON INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM INC: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS REUVEN KAMENETZ OF LAKEWOOD: $170 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds BAIS TOVA INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC ↗
  • Who funds TALMUD TORAH BAIS AVROHOM INC ↗
  • Who funds BAIS SHAINDEL ↗
  • Who funds MISASKIM CORP ↗
  • Who funds BAIS MEDRASH MAYAN HATORAH ↗
  • Who funds MACHON PRI EITZ CHAIM INC ↗
  • Who funds MESIVTA OHR YISROEL INC ↗
  • Who funds MEOROS BAIS YAAKOV INC ↗
  • Who funds RUACH CHAIM INC ↗
  • Who funds CHEVRA-KADISHA YERUSHALAYIM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY45.4× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Toras Chesed Inc · David Rosenbaum Family Foundation · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Tidewater Jewish Foundation Inc · Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dirshu International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dirshu International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Bnos Melech of Lakewood Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Tiferes Bais Yaakov Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Mesivta Ohr Yisroel Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Bais Tova Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Camp Degel Hatorah Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Meoros Bais Yaakov Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dirshu International Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dirshu International Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dirshu International’s filings →

More from the funding graph