Skip to content

· Private foundation

Diersch Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$184kFood & Nutrition$62kHuman Services$51kAnimals$37kHealth$24kPublic Safety & Disaster$18kEducation$16kRecreation & Sports$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE CHURCH$15,000
PAWS WITH A CAUSE$15,000
TELLICO VILLAGE LIBRARY$5,000
OUR PLACE$5,000
SMOKEY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS$5,000
TIMELESS TELLICO FOUNDATION$5,000
1ST LT AL BONNYMAN JR VFW POST 1213$3,000
11TH ARMORED CALVARY'S VVC$3,000
TELLICO VILLAGE VOLUNTARY FIRE DEP$3,000
CATHOLIC NEWMAN CENTER$3,000
HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC CHURCH$2,500
TUNNELS TO TOWERS$2,500
BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES$2,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF EAST TN$1,000
LOUDON COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $15k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $5k → 10%SMOKY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $6k → 10%SMOKEY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $6k → 10%SMOKEY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 10%SMOKEY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 10%SMOKEY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 10%SMOKEY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 10%SMOKEY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 10%SMOKEY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 10%SMOKEY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $240 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Diersch Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 55% of the giving stays in TN; by stated purpose, 0%.

Diersch Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$400k · 19 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
16

Total granted

$400k
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+165%

Still filing today

47%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsFood & NutritionHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KF
    KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $52k · revenue +29%
  • SM
    Smoky Mountain Service Dogs
    8× · 2018–2025 · $42k · revenue +117%
  • PW
    Paws With A Cause
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • PO
    PRINCE OF PEACE CATHOLIC NEWMAN CEN
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • PO
    PRINCE OF PEACE CATHOLIC NEWMAN CTR
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • ST
    ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHU
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ypsilanti Meals on Wheels

Ypsilanti Meals on Wheels provides nutritious meals, social contact and other services to the homebound elderly, ill and disabled in eastern Washtenaw County, to enable them to enjoy healthier, safer, and more independent lives.

—
2
Torrance-Lomita Meals On Wheels Inc

Provides home delivered meals to the house bound residents of Torrance and Lomita.

—
3
Operational K9 Medical Team of Wisconsin
Animals
4
Fort Bend Seniors Meals on Wheels and Much Much More

See Schedule OFort Bend Seniors Meals on Wheels provides comprehensive services, including Meals on Wheels, congregate meals, transportation, case management, health screenings, information and referral services, recreation, and more. Our…

Human Services
5
Meals On Wheels of San Francisco Inc

To provide isolated homebound seniors in san francisco with nutritious meals, daily human contact, and supportive services to prevent their premature institutionalization.

—
6
Washington Dc Meals on Wheels Inc

We deliver healthy delicious meals to our home-bound neighbors. With a vision of creating a more interconnected resilient and compassionate community our program supports entire family systems. In 2024 236 volunteers delivered 55,642 meals…

—
7
Warrior Dog Foundation

To serve the special operations community, families, and k-9 military dogs, as well as law enforcement and contract working dogs. when possible, these canines are placed in forever homes.

Youth Development
8
Meals On Wheels of the Salinas Valley

No senior should go hungry. nutritious meals, which are delivered by caring volunteers, improve the health and well-being of people who are homebound, elderly, or disabled and help them remain in their homes and maintain their independence.

Food & Nutrition
9
Hero Dogs Inc

Hero Dogs improves the quality of life of our nations heroes and enhances the services of community organizations by placing assistance dogs with customized training & lifetime support.

Human Services
10
Wise Tails - a Senior Dog Sanctuary
—
11
Fidos for Freedom Inc

To provide quality trained assistance dogs for mobility-challenged individuals, hearing-impaired individuals and veterans with combat related ptsd.

—
12
Semper K9 Assistance Dogs

Combat veteran-founded and operated Semper K9s mission is to enhance the quality of life for wounded members of the U.S. Armed Forces and their families by providing them with custom-trained mental health mobility service dogs. Using…

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids' Food Basket Inc; the most unlike its peers is Smoky Mountain Service Dogs. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE CHURCH: $90,000 · OtherST THOMAS THE APOSTLE CHURCHOUR PLACE: $30,000 · OtherOUR PLACECATHOLIC NEWMAN CENTER: $27,500 · OtherCATHOLIC NEWMAN CENTERPRINCE OF PEACE CATHOLIC NEWMAN CEN: $25,000 · OtherPRINCE OF PEACE CATHOLIC NEWMAN CENTELLICO VILLAGE LIBRARY: $20,500 · OtherTELLICO VILLAGE LIBRARYTELLICO VILLAGE VOLUNTARY FIRE DEP: $17,500 · OtherTELLICO VILLAGE VOLUNTARY FIRE DEPPRINCE OF PEACE CATHOLIC NEWMAN CTR: $15,000 · OtherST THOMAS THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHU: $15,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC CHURCH: $14,500 · OtherBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $12,000 · Other+16 more: $50,250 · Other+16 moreSmoky Mountain Service Dogs: $42,490 · Human ServicesSmoky Mountain…Paws With A Cause: $20,000 · Human ServicesPaws With A Ca…KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $52,000 · Food & NutritionKIDS' FOOD BAS…MEALS ON WHEELS WESTERN MICHIGAN: $10,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEEL…TIMELESS TELLICO FOUNDATION: $27,750 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $3,500 · Recreation & SportsLOUDON COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $7,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE NATIONAL LIBERTY SHIP MEMORIAL INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EducationTELLICO VILLAGE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $1,300 · Public Safety & DisasterTELLICO BOATERS ASSITANCE RESPONSE TEAM INC: $210 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$317,250Human Services$62,490Food & Nutrition$62,000Recreation & Sports$31,250Housing & Shelter$7,000Arts & Culture$4,000Education$2,500Public Safety & Disaster$1,510

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $52,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSmoky Mountain Service Dogs: $42,490 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetTIMELESS TELLICO FOUNDATION: $27,750 over 6y, 27% of budgetPaws With A Cause: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS WESTERN MICHIGAN: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLOUDON COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $7,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATIONAL LIBERTY SHIP MEMORIAL INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTELLICO VILLAGE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $1,300 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTELLICO BOATERS ASSITANCE RESPONSE TEAM INC: $210 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC ↗
  • Who funds Smoky Mountain Service Dogs ↗
  • Who funds TIMELESS TELLICO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Paws With A Cause ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS WESTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds LOUDON COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL LIBERTY SHIP MEMORIAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TELLICO VILLAGE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds TELLICO BOATERS ASSITANCE RESPONSE TEAM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Diersch Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Diersch Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Diersch Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Diersch Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Diersch Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph