Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Diersch Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Religion$184kFood & Nutrition$62kHuman Services$51kAnimals$37kHealth$24kPublic Safety & Disaster$18kEducation$16kRecreation & Sports$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE CHURCH$15,000
SMOKEY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS$5,270
TIMELESS TELLICO FOUNDATION$5,250
TELLICO VILLAGE LIBRARY$5,000
PAWS WITH A CAUSE$5,000
OUR PLACE$5,000
LOUDON COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
TELLICO VILLAGE VOLUNTARY FIRE DEP$3,000
11TH ARMORED CALVARY'S VVC$2,500
HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC CHURCH$2,500
1ST LT AL BONNYMAN JR VFW POST 1213$2,500
CATHOLIC NEWMAN CENTER$2,500
MEALS ON WHEELS WESTERN MI$2,000
BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES$2,000
NAT LIBERTY SHIP MEMORIAL$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $5k → 10%SMOKY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $6k → 10%SMOKEY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $6k → 10%SMOKEY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 10%SMOKEY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 10%SMOKEY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 10%SMOKEY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 10%SMOKEY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 10%SMOKEY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $240 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of Diersch Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 55% of the giving stays in TN; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Diersch Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$325k · 17 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
15

Total granted

$325k
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+165%

Still filing today

47%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsFood & NutritionHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KF
    KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $52k · revenue +29%
  • SM
    Smoky Mountain Service Dogs
    7× · 2018–2024 · $37k · revenue +65%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS WESTERN MICHIGAN
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • PO
    PRINCE OF PEACE CATHOLIC NEWMAN CEN
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • PO
    PRINCE OF PEACE CATHOLIC NEWMAN CTR
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • ST
    ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHU
    one grant, 2019 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Torrance-Lomita Meals On Wheels Inc

Provides home delivered meals to the house bound residents of Torrance and Lomita.

2
Operational K9 Medical Team of Wisconsin
Animals
3
Meals On Wheels of Hancock County Inc

Our mission is to help the citizens of hancock county maintain an independent lifestyle through the delivery of nutritious meals in accordance with prescribed dietary needs and provide a point of personal contact with the community.

Food & Nutrition
4
Ypsilanti Meals On Wheels

Ypsilanti meals on wheels supports the community's homebound elderly, ill and disabled residents with home-delivered meals, social contact, pet food and supplies, personal goods and other supports to help them live healthier, safer and…

5
Washington Dc Meals on Wheels Inc

We deliver healthy delicious meals to our home-bound neighbors. With a vision of creating a more interconnected resilient and compassionate community our program supports entire family systems. In 2024 236 volunteers delivered 55,642 meals…

6
Meals On Wheels Diablo Region

To enhance the lives of older adults by delivering healthy meals and providing an array of supportive services that empower seniors to live independently, safely, and with dignity.

Human Services
7
Meals On Wheels of Somerset County Inc

Providing meals to the elderly and needy

Food & Nutrition
8
Wise Tails - a Senior Dog Sanctuary
9
Meals on Wheels Atlanta Inc

To support senior independence through meals, shelter, education, and community.

Human Services
10
Meals On Wheels of the Monterey Peninsula Inc

To empower seniors, disabled adults, veterans, and other under served populations to remain independent by nourishing their bodies, minds, and spirits, and drive out hunger and isolation in our region.

Food & Nutrition
11
West Shore Meals On Wheels

Prepare and deliver nutritious meals to the elderly, disabled, convalescing and others who are unable to prepare adequate meals for themselves.

Food & Nutrition
12
Mckeesport Meals on Wheels Inc

McKeesport Area Meals on Wheels provides meals to numerous McKeesport Area elderly anddisabled individuals throughtout the calender year.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids' Food Basket Inc and the most unlike its peers is Smoky Mountain Service Dogs. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE CHURCH — $75,000 · OtherST THOMAS THE APOSTLE CHURCHOUR PLACE — $25,000 · OtherOUR PLACEPRINCE OF PEACE CATHOLIC NEWMAN CEN — $25,000 · OtherPRINCE OF PEACE CATHOLIC NEWMAN CENCATHOLIC NEWMAN CENTER — $24,500 · OtherCATHOLIC NEWMAN CENTERTELLICO VILLAGE LIBRARY — $15,500 · OtherTELLICO VILLAGE LIBRARYPRINCE OF PEACE CATHOLIC NEWMAN CTR — $15,000 · OtherPRINCE OF PEACE CATHOLIC NEWMAN CTRST THOMAS THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHU — $15,000 · OtherST THOMAS THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHUTELLICO VILLAGE VOLUNTARY FIRE DEP — $14,500 · OtherHOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC CHURCH — $12,000 · OtherST THOMAS THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHUR — $10,000 · OtherBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES — $10,000 · Other+14 more — $33,250 · Other+14 moreKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC — $52,000 · Food & NutritionKIDS' FOOD BASKE…MEALS ON WHEELS WESTERN MICHIGAN — $10,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS …Smoky Mountain Service Dogs — $37,490 · Human ServicesSmoky Mount…Paws With A Cause — $5,000 · Human ServicesPaws With A…TIMELESS TELLICO FOUNDATION — $22,750 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC — $3,500 · Recreation & SportsLOUDON COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $6,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE NATIONAL LIBERTY SHIP MEMORIAL INC — $4,000 · Arts & CultureTELLICO VILLAGE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $1,300 · Public Safety & DisasterTELLICO BOATERS ASSITANCE RESPONSE TEAM INC — $210 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$274,750Food & Nutrition$62,000Human Services$42,490Recreation & Sports$26,250Housing & Shelter$6,000Arts & Culture$4,000Public Safety & Disaster$1,510

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC — $52,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSmoky Mountain Service Dogs — $37,490 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTIMELESS TELLICO FOUNDATION — $22,750 over 5y, 27% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS WESTERN MICHIGAN — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLOUDON COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPaws With A Cause — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATIONAL LIBERTY SHIP MEMORIAL INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTELLICO VILLAGE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $1,300 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTELLICO BOATERS ASSITANCE RESPONSE TEAM INC — $210 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC
  • Who funds Smoky Mountain Service Dogs
  • Who funds TIMELESS TELLICO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS WESTERN MICHIGAN
  • Who funds LOUDON COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
  • Who funds Paws With A Cause
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL LIBERTY SHIP MEMORIAL INC
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC
  • Who funds TELLICO VILLAGE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
  • Who funds TELLICO BOATERS ASSITANCE RESPONSE TEAM INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Diersch Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Diersch Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Diersch Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph