Skip to content
Diebold Employees Charitable Fd Ta at a glance

· Private foundation

Diebold Employees Charitable Fd Ta

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$43k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$38kHuman Services$38kHealth$21kRecreation & Sports$16kArts & Culture$13kYouth Development$12kReligion$11kAnimals$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$761k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA$4,500
STARK COUNTY HUNGER TASK FORCE$3,000
PEGASUS FARM$2,500
AKRONCANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK$2,000
CANTON PALACE THEATRE$2,000
A COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS$2,000
HAVEN OF REST MINISTRIES$2,000
REFUGE OF HOPE MINISTRIES$2,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF MASSILLON$1,500
ASCEND SERVICES$1,500
LEGACY PROJECT OF STARK$1,500
AKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,500
J BABE STEARN COMMUNITY CENTER$1,500
THE VILLAGE NETWORK$1,500
THANKSGIVING BASKETS DOWNTOWN INC$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $2k → 12%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $1k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%SIFFRIN INC: $1k → 13%SIFFRIN INC: $1k → 13%HANNAHS HOUSE 119: $1k → 13%HANNAH'S HOUSE 119: $1k → 13%HANNAHS HOUSE 119: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$121k · 32 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
45

Total granted

$121k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+36%

Still filing today

81%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PEGASUS FARM
    4× · 2020–2024 · $12k · revenue +42%
  • AR
    AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK
    4× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +1%
  • SC
    Stark County Hunger Task Force Inc
    4× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • SC
    Stark County Humane Society
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • AC
    Akron Canton Regional Foodbank
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • PF
    Pegasus Farm
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Canton Regional Chamber of Commerce

Advancement of the economic, industrial, professional, cultural and civic welfare of stark county and its surrounding region and the promotion and preservation of the competitive free enterprise system.

—
2
Stark County Council On Aging

Provide elderly services to allow persons to stay in their own homes

Human Services
3
Community Building Partnership of Stark County Inc

To promote the revitalization of neighborhoods in stark county by leading partnership-based, neighborhood-specific, revitalization efforts and developing programs that support community reinvestment.

Community Improvement
4
Stark Housing Network Inc

Ending homelessness in stark county ohio.

Human Services
5
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
6
Access Health Stark County Inc

Our mission is to provide access to a coordinated system of health care and community resources for those that are underserved and impacted by community conditions.

Health
7
Stark Community Support Network

To improve family quality of life

Human Services
8
Hospice of Northwest Ohio

Hospice of northwest ohio provides specialized medical emotional and spiritual care to people of all ages - and their families - living with any end-stage illness in northwest ohio and southeast michigan

—
9
Stark County Agricultural Society Inc

Agricultural matters education

Food & Nutrition
10
Homeless Outreach Team of Stark Cou

Assist the homeless to rise out of poverty

Housing & Shelter
11
Phoenix Rising Behav Healthcare

Provide counseling, psychiatry, and case management services to the citizens of stark and surrounding counties in ohio clients served 4,800

Health
12
Stark County Community Action Agency

To promote economic self-sufficiency among low-income families and individuals of stark county.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stark County Humane Society; the most unlike its peers is Pace Dba Alliance Area Domestic Violence Shelter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/39
Grantees still filing
27/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HAVEN OF REST MINISTRIES INCORPORATED: $7,400 · OtherHAVEN OF REST MINISTRIES INCORPORATEDYMCA: $6,500 · OtherYMCATHANKSGIVING BASKETS DOWNTOWN INC: $4,500 · OtherPACE DBA ALLIANCE AREA DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER: $3,750 · OtherThe Canton Student Loan Foundation: $3,700 · OtherA COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS OF STARK COUNTY INC: $5,000 · OtherTHE LEGACY PROJECT OF STARK: $4,500 · OtherREFUGE OF HOPE MINISTRIES: $4,000 · Other+56 more: $66,150 · Other+56 moreAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK: $10,000 · Food & NutritionAKRON-CANTON…Stark County Hunger Task Force Inc: $9,000 · Food & NutritionStark County…PEGASUS FARM: $11,900 · Recreation & SportsPEGASUS F…J Babe Stearn Community Center: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsJ Babe St…Canton Museum of Art: $3,000 · Arts & CultureARTS IN STARK: $3,000 · Arts & CultureNORTH CANTON PLAYHOUSE: $2,700 · Arts & CultureCANTON PALACE THEATRE ASSOCIATION: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCANTON BALLET: $1,500 · Arts & CultureSTEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY: $2,500 · HealthPATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 · HealthNAMI STARK COUNTY INC: $2,000 · HealthMAKE A WAY INC: $1,750 · HealthBeacon Charitable Pharmacy Inc: $1,000 · HealthAKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthASHLAND COUNTY CANCER ASSOCIATION INC: $500 · HealthFAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesHannah's House 119: $2,500 · Human ServicesSIFFRIN INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,500 · Human ServicesSTARK COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,750 · AnimalsWhispering Grace Horses: $3,500 · Animals
Other$105,500Food & Nutrition$19,000Recreation & Sports$14,900Arts & Culture$12,200Health$10,750Human Services$8,500Animals$7,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEGASUS FARM: $11,900 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetStark County Hunger Task Force Inc: $9,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetA COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS OF STARK COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetTHE LEGACY PROJECT OF STARK: $4,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetREFUGE OF HOPE MINISTRIES: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTARK COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPACE DBA ALLIANCE AREA DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER: $3,750 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe Canton Student Loan Foundation: $3,700 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWhispering Grace Horses: $3,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB OF MASSILLON INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCanton Museum of Art: $3,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetARTS IN STARK: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJ Babe Stearn Community Center: $3,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH CANTON PLAYHOUSE: $2,700 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHannah's House 119: $2,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHILD & ADOLESCENT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANTON PALACE THEATRE ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIFFRIN INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI STARK COUNTY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMAKE A WAY INC: $1,750 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTHE VILLAGE NETWORK: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANTON BALLET: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeacon Charitable Pharmacy Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARTVILLE MIGRANT COUNCIL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSTARKFRESH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHammer & Nails Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetASHLAND COUNTY CANCER ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONE STEP AHEAD OHIO JOSEPH MANOFSKY: $500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH EAST OHIO: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stark Community Found…Hoover Foundation Inc…Sisters of Charity Fo…Timken Foundation of …Timken Co Charitable …United Way of Greater…Christ FoundationAustin-Bailey Health …The Belden Brick Char…Albert W & Edith V Fl…The Paul and Carol Da…The Johnson-Kazar Cha…
Stark Community FoundationOH54.3× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stark Community Foundation · Hoover Foundation Income Account · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton · Timken Foundation of Canton · Timken Co Charitable & Educational Fund · United Way of Greater Stark County · Christ Foundation · Austin-Bailey Health & Wellness Foundation · The Belden Brick Charitable Trust · Albert W & Edith V Flowers Charitable · The Paul and Carol David Foundation · The Johnson-Kazar Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Diebold Employees Charitable Fd Ta funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Diebold Employees Charitable Fd Ta. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Diebold Employees Charitable Fd Ta’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home