Skip to content

· Private foundation

Diana and Richard C Strauss Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$249k
Granted FY2017
16
Grants FY2017
2
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of Diana and Richard C Strauss Foundation’s FY2018 grant dollars went to The Dallas Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2018 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year Diana and Richard C Strauss Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $249k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
’17
0
’18

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Philanthropy$811kArts & Culture$101kHealth$87kHuman Services$33kFood & Nutrition$10kYouth Development$5kReligion$5kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2017 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k9 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $118k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DALLAS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM CENTER$100,000
UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER$30,000
NATIONAL CENTER FOR LEARNING DISABILITIES INC$25,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS$25,000
VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION$17,500
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS$5,000
LAURA W BUSH INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH FUND$5,000
SUSAN G KOMEN$5,000
TEXAS ASSOCIATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN$5,000
FAMILY GATEWAY$3,000
THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL$2,500
MANEGAIT$2,500
SALVATION ARMY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MANEGAIT: $3k → 5%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Public Policy Priorities

At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…

Public Benefit
2
North Texas Christian Foundation

National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.

Philanthropy
3
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
4
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
5
FIRST3YEARS

First3years nurtures early relational and mental health of infants and toddlers in texas. working in deep collaboration with caregivers, parents, and professionals statewide, we cultivate strong early childhood systems, educate our…

—
6
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
7
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
8
Progress Texas

Progress Texas is a non-profit media organization advocating for progressive ideals and policies in our state.

Civil Rights
9
Capital of Texas Public Telecommunications Council

Klru is a leader in public media, distinguished by its energetic engagement with the community and for the quality and creativity of content. klru illuminates the wider world of knowledge; the importance of discourse; and the many…

Arts & Culture
10
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
11
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
12
Texas Alliance for Patient Access

Preserve access to quality healthcare for all texans

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities Foundation of Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $805,644 · PhilanthropyTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION+2 more: $7,500 · PhilanthropyDALLAS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM CENTER: $100,000 · OtherDALLAS HOLOCAUST MUSE…UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $34,750 · OtherUT SOUTHWESTERN MEDIC…NATIONAL CENTER FOR LEARNING DISABILITIES INC: $25,000 · OtherNATIONAL CENTER FOR L…VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION: $17,500 · OtherVISITING NURSE ASSOCI…Individual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $10,000 · Other+2 more: $7,500 · OtherCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesMane Gait: $2,500 · Human ServicesTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $5,000 · HealthTEXPROTECTS-THE TEXAS ASSOCIATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentFAMILY GATEWAY INC: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterKATY ARTREACH: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$813,144Other$204,750Human Services$27,500Education$5,000Health$5,000Youth Development$5,000Housing & Shelter$3,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $805,644 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEARNING DISABILITIES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXPROTECTS-THE TEXAS ASSOCIATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILY GATEWAY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMane Gait: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKATY ARTREACH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Diana and Richard C Strauss Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Diana and Richard C Strauss Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Diana and Richard C Strauss Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Diana and Richard C Strauss Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Diana and Richard C Strauss’ filings →

    More from the funding graph