Skip to content

· Public charity

Dialysis Clinic Inc

The primary responsibility of DIALYSIS CLINIC INC.

$8.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$4.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$80MPhilanthropy$145k
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $166k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $749k
  • $250k+6 grants · $7.2M
$60,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$674M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND$4,000,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO$1,661,898
STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC$496,954
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA$449,485
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI$310,813
TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER$260,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS$229,990
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$125,000
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$118,908
KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF THE GREATER CHATTANOOGA AREA$60,000
UNIVERSITY OF CA - DAVIS$55,000
TULANE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE$55,000
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER$55,000
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA$50,527
CASA EXPERANZA ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION INC$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE UPSTATE FOUNDATION: $457k → 14%THE UPSTATE FOUNDATION: $451k → 14%THE UPSTATE FOUNDATION: $79k → 14%THE UPSTATE FOUNDATION: $19k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
NE
MO
MD
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
LA
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$87M · 32 repeat orgs$396k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
8

Total granted

$87M
$396k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+1%

Still filing today

66%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AK
    AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $42M · revenue +9%
  • UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18M · revenue +62%
  • UH
    UC HEALTH FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.1M · revenue +155% · 27% of their budget

Funded once

  • TU
    Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +1%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $89k · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
2
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
8
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
10
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
University of Louisville Physicians Inc

Provide professional medical services in a variety of medical specialties and disciplines in accordance with the corporation's charitable mission: strengthen and broaden the range of skills and patient populations available for physicians…

Health
12
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medical University of South Carolina Foundation; the most unlike its peers is East Tennessee Kidney Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $41,914,049 · OtherAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INCCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $2,414,181 · Other+15 more: $8,208,843 · Other+15 moreUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $18,322,544 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDAT…STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $2,036,031 · EducationSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION INCThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $1,387,341 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The …RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,171,076 · EducationCreighton University: $889,529 · Education+7 more: $1,175,367 · EducationUC HEALTH FOUNDATION: $4,115,223 · HealthUC HEALTH FO…MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $3,687,882 · HealthMEDICAL UNIV…TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER PHYSICIANS ORGANIZATION INC: $681,996 · HealthTUFTS MEDICA…Vanderbilt University Medical Center: $364,937 · Health+5 more: $640,759 · Health+5 moreTHE UPSTATE FOUNDATION INC: $1,006,608 · Human ServicesCASA ESPERANZA ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $185,000 · PhilanthropyLUDHIANA CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE BOARD USA INC: $6,583 · International
Other$52,537,073Education$24,981,888Health$9,490,797Human Services$1,006,608Philanthropy$185,000International$6,583

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $41,914,049 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $18,322,544 over 9y, 6.9% of budgetUC HEALTH FOUNDATION: $4,115,223 over 9y, 27% of budgetMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $3,687,882 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $2,036,031 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $1,387,341 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,171,076 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UPSTATE FOUNDATION INC: $1,006,608 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetCreighton University: $889,529 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF THE GREATER CHATTANOOGA AREA INC: $870,000 over 9y, 29% of budgetTUFTS MEDICAL CENTER PHYSICIANS ORGANIZATION INC: $681,996 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetAUGUSTA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $434,395 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNAL MEDICINE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $373,099 over 3y, 77% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $364,937 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $270,552 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLSU HEALTH FOUNDATION NEW ORLEANS: $248,614 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $208,718 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION GROUP RETURN: $193,995 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCASA ESPERANZA ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $185,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $103,025 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $89,125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE: $74,673 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $45,144 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC: $41,885 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDNEY & UROLOGY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $22,500 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetNEBRASKA KIDNEY ASSOCIATION: $12,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetLUDHIANA CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE BOARD USA INC: $6,583 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEAST TENNESSEE KIDNEY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UC HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE UPSTATE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Creighton University ↗
  • Who funds THE KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF THE GREATER CHATTANOOGA AREA INC ↗
  • Who funds TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER PHYSICIANS ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNAL MEDICINE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds LSU HEALTH FOUNDATION NEW ORLEANS ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION GROUP RETURN ↗
  • Who funds CASA ESPERANZA ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds National Kidney Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE UWM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDNEY & UROLOGY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA KIDNEY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LUDHIANA CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE BOARD USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cystic Fibrosis FoundationMD13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dialysis Clinic Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dialysis Clinic Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dialysis Clinic Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dialysis Clinic Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dialysis Clinic’s filings →

More from the funding graph