Skip to content

· Public charity

Diabetes Prevention and Aid Fund

Borderlands rescues produce to improve the quality of peoples lives by addressing their most basic of human needs - access to nutritious, fresh produce and living in a healthy environment by educating people to help curb food waste and save our planet

$21M
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$10MRecreation & Sports$21kReligion$6k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $6,036, the rows itemized in this filing. The $21,309,755 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,303,719 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$6,036
Median grant
—
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$6,036
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $722k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Maximum Impact FB TX: $56k → 16%Maximum Impact Food Impact FL: $149k → 26%Midwest Food Bank - TX: $263k → 11%Midwest Food Bank AZ: $62k → 15%Midwest Food Bank OH: $130k → 11%Midwest Food Bank - IL: $62k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
IN
UT
AZ
NM
KS
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
2
Feeding America

Our mission is to advance change in America by ensuring equitable access to nutritious food for all in partnership with partner food banks, policymakers, supporters, and the communities we serve.

Food & Nutrition
3
Second Harvest Heartland

Second harvest heartland's mission is to end hunger together. in partnership with more than 1,000 food shelves and hunger-relief programs in minnesota and western wisconsin, we provided 143 million meals to neighbors last year.

Food & Nutrition
4
North Texas Food Bank

To close the hunger gap in north texas by working through over 500 feeding partners to provide access to nutritious food and address the root causes of hunger.

—
5
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
6
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
7
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
8
Food Bank for Monterey County

To distribute food to alleviate hunger, provide emergency food services during a natural disaster, and conduct educational awareness programs relating to hunger issues in monterey county.

Unclassified
9
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
10
Montana Food Bank Network Inc

Our mission: to end hunger in montana through food acquisition and distribution, education, and advocacy. we are the only statewide hunger organization, providing emergency food and increasing food access among needy children, seniors and…

Food & Nutrition
11
Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc

To feed people by soliciting and distributing food and other products through partner agencies and educating the community about the nature of and solutions to problems of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
12
Food Bank of Contra Costa and Solano

The food bank of contra costa and solano (food bank) was incorporated on july 28, 1975. the food bank was established in order to efficiently gather, warehouse, and distribute food products to contra costa county charities meeting…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Islamic Community Center of Phoenix. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/42
Grantees still filing
29/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DIABETES PREVENTION AND AID FUND: $7,593,074 · Food & NutritionDIABETES PREVENTION AND AID FUNDMeans Database Inc: $509,394 · Food & NutritionMeans Database Inc+4 more: $338,009 · Food & NutritionGethsemane Ministry: $605,045 · OtherGethsemane M…HIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $73,953 · OtherHIGH PLAINS …SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $73,953 · OtherSAN ANTONIO …NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $66,400 · OtherNORTHWEST HA…Others Under 5K: $63,018 · OtherOthers Under…UTAH FOOD BANK: $61,852 · OtherGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $59,760 · OtherSanta Cruz County Citizen's Corps: $49,390 · Other+7 more: $116,716 · Other+7 moreMIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP: $517,307 · Human ServicesMAXIMUM IMPACT LOVE INC: $204,827 · Human Services
Food & Nutrition$8,440,477Other$1,170,087Human Services$722,134

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDIABETES PREVENTION AND AID FUND: $7,593,074 over 4y, 31% of budgetMIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP: $517,307 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMeans Database Inc: $509,394 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMAXIMUM IMPACT LOVE INC: $204,827 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $135,805 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $73,953 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $73,953 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $73,953 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $66,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $66,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $61,852 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $61,851 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $59,760 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DIABETES PREVENTION AND AID FUND ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP ↗
  • Who funds Means Database Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAXIMUM IMPACT LOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE3.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Diabetes Prevention and Aid Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Diabetes Prevention and Aid Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Diabetes Prevention and Aid Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Diabetes Prevention and Aid Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Diabetes Prevention and Aid’s filings →

    More from the funding graph