Skip to content
Di Brimonsa Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Di Brimonsa Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$34kEducation$6kHuman Services$5kPublic Benefit$4kYouth Development$1kHousing & Shelter$250Philanthropy$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
13
States reached
$179k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EISENHOWER HEALTH FOUNDATION$2,500
THE HOUSE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION$1,500
PALO ALTO MEDICAL FOUNDATION$1,000
LEARNING HOME VOLUNTEERS$750
THE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE$250
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$250
Individual grant recipient$250
JUDICIAL WATCH$250
TURNING POINT USA$250
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$250
SHRINERS CHILDREN'S$250
MERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS$250
THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION$250
VFW VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS$250
BOYS TOWN$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS TOWN: $250 → 12%MISSION HOSPICE & HOME CARE: $5k → 7%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%BOYS TOWN: $250 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
MI
NY
OH
CA
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
AZ
KS
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$44k · 22 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
7

Total granted

$44k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+2%

Still filing today

59%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HOUSE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +59%
  • EM
    Eisenhower Medical Center
    3× · 2023–2025 · $6k · revenue +23%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $4k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • MH
    MISSION HOSPICE & HOME CARE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -42%
  • PV
    PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2022 · $250 · revenue -34%
  • OS
    OPERATION SMILE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $250 · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
7
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
8
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
9
New York Society for the Relief of the Ruptured and Crippled Maintaining the

The mission of hospital for special surgery is to provide the highest quality patient care, improve mobility, and enhance the quality of life for all and to advance the science of orthopedic surgery, rheumatology, and their related…

Health
10
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
11
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
12
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE HOUSE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $7,500 · HealthTHE HOUSE INSTITUTE FOUNDATIONEisenhower Medical Center: $6,000 · HealthEisenhower Medical CenterST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,600 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATIONSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $750 · Health+1 more: $250 · HealthSICHL: $10,000 · OtherSICHLTHE FUND FOR CATHEDRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $2,000 · OtherTHE FUND FOR CATHEDRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOO…MAKE A WISH: $1,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherDisabled American Veterans: $750 · OtherVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS: $750 · Other+11 more: $3,500 · Other+11 moreMISSION HOSPICE & HOME CARE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesMISSION HOSP…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARR…Father Flanagan's Boys' Home: $500 · Human ServicesFather Flana…Learning Home Volunteers: $2,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,000 · EducationTHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE: $500 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $500 · EducationJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $1,250 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Public BenefitOPERATION SMILE INC: $250 · InternationalMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $250 · Philanthropy
Health$20,100Other$20,000Human Services$6,000Education$4,000Public Benefit$2,250International$250Philanthropy$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HOUSE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLearning Home Volunteers: $2,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Di Brimonsa Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Di Brimonsa Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Di Brimonsa’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home