Skip to content

· Private foundation

DHG Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Religion$13kEducation$8kHuman Services$680Health$234Food & Nutrition$226Public Safety & Disaster$154Philanthropy$75Arts & Culture$20Other$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$22,045
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Various$22,045
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $436) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Chaiever: $436 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11k · 4 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
56

Total granted

$11k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+1%

Still filing today

75%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
EducationReligionInternationalFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KE
    KEREN EVEN HABOCHEN INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $6k · revenue +4%
  • LB
    LEV BEREL INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $4k · revenue +20%
  • BS
    BMG STUDENT AID FUND
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • KK
    KOLLEL KODSHIM AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
2
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
3
Yeshiva Toras Chaim Inc

The organization operates a religious/parochial high school and college in lakewood, nj.

Unclassified
4
Ahavas Torah V'chesed
Philanthropy
5
Zocher Chasdai Ovos

Jewish Observance of Shabbos, Chagim, Torah Learning

Religion
6
Toras Chaim Development Company Inc

Provide a building for a religious school.

Education
7
Bais Medrash Mayan Hatorah

To provide religious education and services to our students in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
8
Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood Inc

Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.

Education
9
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
10
Hashevaynu Inc

The furthurance of jewish concepts and religious beliefs.

Education
11
Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To provide religious Jewish education.

Education
12
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tomchei Shabbos D'lakewood Inc; the most unlike its peers is Schwartz's Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Various: $22,045 · OtherVariousIndividual grant recipient: $3,820 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $1,750 · OtherKOLLEL KODSHIM AMERICA INC: $1,700 · Other+43 more: $8,813 · Other+43 moreKEREN EVEN HABOCHEN INC: $6,000 · EducationKEREN EVEN HABO…BMG STUDENT AID FUND: $1,000 · EducationBMG STUDENT AID…+2 more: $176 · EducationLEV BEREL INC: $4,000 · ReligionLEV BEREL…+1 more: $126 · ReligionYESHIVAS NACHLAS BNEI SHIMON: $500 · InternationalTOV VACHESED INC: $126 · InternationalCHAI 4EVER INC: $436 · Human ServicesROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $180 · PhilanthropyTOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC: $100 · Food & NutritionSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $54 · Food & NutritionHATZOLAH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES: $100 · Public Safety & DisasterCHAVEIRIM VOLUNTEER SERVICES INC: $54 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$38,128Education$7,176Religion$4,126International$626Human Services$436Philanthropy$180Food & Nutrition$154Public Safety & Disaster$154

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKEREN EVEN HABOCHEN INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLEV BEREL INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBMG STUDENT AID FUND: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTASHBAR OF LAKEWOOD INC: $691 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAS NACHLAS BNEI SHIMON: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI 4EVER INC: $436 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $126 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBais Yaakov High School of Lakewood Inc: $126 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOV VACHESED INC: $126 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHATZOLAH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSchwartz's Foundation: $75 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHAVEIRIM VOLUNTEER SERVICES INC: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KEREN EVEN HABOCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds LEV BEREL INC ↗
  • Who funds BMG STUDENT AID FUND ↗
  • Who funds TASHBAR OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS NACHLAS BNEI SHIMON ↗
  • Who funds CHAI 4EVER INC ↗
  • Who funds ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP ↗
  • Who funds Bais Yaakov High School of Lakewood Inc ↗
  • Who funds TOV VACHESED INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds HATZOLAH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Schwartz's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHAVEIRIM VOLUNTEER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247 ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY34.1× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Donors Fund Inc · Senior Community Services Inc · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The R & S Family Foundation Inc · Jacob and Malka Fischer Foundation · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Maalot

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization DHG Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from DHG Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Mesivta Keren Orah: 10% of income from government
  • Tashbar of Lakewood Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Chai 4EVER Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to DHG Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to DHG Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on DHG’s filings →

More from the funding graph