Skip to content

· Public charity

Desai Foundation

The DESAI FOUNDATION empowers women and children through community programs to elevate health, livelihood, menstrual equity in rural india.

$43k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0177% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$83kHealth$44kFood & Nutrition$40kCommunity Improvement$33kArts & Culture$27kHuman Services$25kInternational$3kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $31,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $43,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF LINCOLN COA INC$25,000
TIE-BOSTON FOUNDATION$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 59% of grant dollars ($162k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 41% that went abroad ($111k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMMUNITY IMPACT AT COLUMBIA: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 41% of all-years giving ($111k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$111k · 6 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$58k · 4 repeat orgs$215k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +283% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
22

Total granted

$58k
$190k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+283%
+12%

Still filing today

50%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’23’24
EducationPublic Safety & DisasterInternationalEmploymentFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    COMMUNITY IMPACT AT COLUMBIA
    2× · 2019–2020 · $17k
  • TF
    TIE-BOSTON FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $16k · revenue +1%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2020 · $13k

Funded once

  • GV
    GRAM VIKAS TRUST
    one grant, 2019 · $32k
  • UV
    UNTDI VIBHAG KELAVNI MANDAL
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • AF
    ABOUT FRESH INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
4
New England Lawboston

New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…

Education
5
Friends of Teach for India Inc

Empowering mobilizers like teach for india with intellectual, human, and financial resources to eliminate educational inequity in india.

Education
6
Dean College

Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…

Education
7
Massachusetts Education & Career Opportunities Inc

Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…

Education
8
Franklin W Olin College of Engineering Inc

Olin college prepares students to become exemplary engineering innovators who recognize needs, design solutions, and engage in creative enterprises for the good of the world. olin is dedicated to continual discovery and development of…

Education
9
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
10
Massachusetts Alliance for Early College Inc

The massachusetts alliance for early college (ma4ec) is a cross-sector coalition focused on significantly increasing the number of students with access to high-quality early college in massachusetts to promote college and career success…

Education
11
The Massachusetts Institute for a New Commonwealth Inc

Massinc's mission is to make massachusetts a place of civic vitality and inclusive economic opportunity by providing residents with the nonpartisan research, reporting, analysis, and civic engagement necessary to understand policy choices,…

Crime & Legal
12
Axim Collaborative Inc

The axim collaborative, inc. mission is to make learning more accessible, relevant, and effective for all learners. axim collaborative, inc. transforms education to work pathways by facilitating collaboration and innovations to build an…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Impact Inc; the most unlike its peers is Peabody Essex Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRAM VIKAS TRUST: $32,286 · OtherGRAM VIKAS TRUSTFRIENDS OF THE LINCOLN COUNCIL ON AGING: $25,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE LINCOLN COUNCIL ON AGINGUNTDI VIBHAG KELAVNI MANDAL: $25,000 · OtherUNTDI VIBHAG KELAVNI MANDALFOOD BANK NY CITY: $20,000 · OtherFOOD BANK NY CITYIndividual grant recipient: $18,557 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOMMUNITY IMPACT AT COLUMBIA: $16,800 · OtherCOMMUNITY IMPACT AT COLUMBIAINDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECH: $14,285 · OtherINDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMIDDLESEX COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,225 · Other+10 more: $12,830 · Other+10 moreABOUT FRESH INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionTIE-BOSTON FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 · Community ImprovementMIDDLESEX COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION C/O JACKSON CHEGE: $12,500 · EducationCOMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesPEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$205,983Food & Nutrition$20,000Community Improvement$16,000Education$12,500Human Services$10,000Arts & Culture$6,000Public Safety & Disaster$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE LINCOLN COUNCIL ON AGING: $25,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetABOUT FRESH INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTIE-BOSTON FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetMIDDLESEX COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION C/O JACKSON CHEGE: $12,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE LINCOLN COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds ABOUT FRESH INC ↗
  • Who funds TIE-BOSTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLESEX COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION C/O JACKSON CHEGE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY IMPACT INC ↗
  • Who funds PEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Asha for Education ↗
  • Who funds SUMMER SEARCH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Desai Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Desai Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Peabody Essex Museum Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Desai Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Desai Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $974k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Desai’s filings →

More from the funding graph