Skip to content

· Public charity

Denver Civic Ventures Inc

Dcv is a charitable public purpose organization, which mobilizes resources to implement civic design and development initiatives and to activate the downtown denver public realm.

$469k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$54k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Community Improvement$1.4MEnvironment$714k
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $80k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $327k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $54k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$54,177
HAI SUNG CHUNG DBA CHUNG BROS INC$17,000
PEAKVOLT RENTALS LLC$17,000
EARL'S RESTAURANT INC$17,000
CHARMAINE BILLINSLEY DBA THE MUSEUM$17,000
KYOTO RAMEN INC$17,000
GRILL EM' HOLDINGS LLC$17,000
DREAM KANG LLC DBA POKE WORLD$17,000
Individual grant recipient$15,545
BLAKE STREET WAYFARER LLC DBA LITTL$15,000
TSCANY CAF INC$15,000
CASSANDRA ALLEN DBA VINTAGE HANBAGS$15,000
CHOLON HOLDING LLC$15,000
ZHIJIAN LIU DBA DOWNTOWN 1617 LLC$15,000
SALAD COLLECTIVE LLC$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Greek Goodies LLC: $8k → 15%Upper Larimer Wine Bar LLC: $8k → 12%DREAM KANG LLC DBA POKE WORLD: $17k → 5%HAIR BY MELEAH LLC: $10k → 6%LYNDSAY MCKEEVER DBA LUNA FOX PEDIC: $10k → 6%SOUP 4 HIM LLC: $15k → 9%KU CHA HOUSE OF TEA INC: $15k → 12%KYOTO RAMEN INC: $17k → 8%BOCKAI AIAH AHMADU DBA TOUR DE VENU: $10k → 10%SALAD COLLECTIVE LLC: $15k → 7%CHARMAINE BILLINSLEY DBA THE MUSEUM: $17k → 12%LAZO FOODS LLC: $17k → 12%MODERN MARKET: $17k → 12%COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE: $170k → 12%INDYINK CORPORATION: $17k → 12%14TH AND COURT LLC: $182k → 12%DENVER PAVILIONS: $54k → 12%Bop Republic Plaza I LLC: $45k → 12%Studebaker Condo Association: $21k → 12%LOS LEONES: $17k → 12%EARL'S RESTAURANT INC: $17k → 12%NAVA LLC: $17k → 12%PEAKVOLT RENTALS LLC: $17k → 12%HAI SUNG CHUNG DBA CHUNG BROS INC: $17k → 12%ALOHA HAT COMPANY: $16k → 12%APPALOOSA GRILL LLC: $15k → 12%ZHIJIAN LIU DBA DOWNTOWN 1617 LLC: $15k → 12%NOOK ON 16TH: $15k → 12%BLAKE STREET WAYFARER LLC DBA LITTL: $15k → 12%CASSANDRA ALLEN DBA VINTAGE HANBAGS: $15k → 12%SADYTA INC: $15k → 12%RED SQUARE BISTRO LLC: $15k → 12%GG NAILS: $15k → 12%NAMASTEE LLC: $15k → 12%1520 BLAKE LLC: $15k → 12%LITTLE FINCH: $15k → 12%MIMI BUBBLE TEA: $13k → 12%The Ice House Condominium Association Inc: $12k → 12%GUILLERMO PHARIS BRIDAL INC: $10k → 12%HERMESTO LLC: $10k → 12%SADYTA INC: $8k → 12%CHOLON HOLDING LLC: $15k → 12%LEROUX BISTRO LLC: $15k → 12%GRILL EM' HOLDINGS LLC: $17k → 12%ORANGE PEEL PEDICABS: $10k → 12%DK-GA INC: $17k → 12%SUPHAKIT TRISIVIRAT DBA DENVER PEDI: $10k → 12%LAWRENCE STONER DBA SUMOS PEDICAB: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Denver Civic Ventures Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 73% of the giving stays in CO; by stated purpose, 53%.

Denver Civic Ventures Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 33% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

6%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$134k · 5 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
107

Total granted

$134k
$1.6M

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $406k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SD
    STAN'S DOWNTOWN BARBERS LLC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $42k
  • KR
    KYOTO RAMEN INC
    2× · 2021–2025 · $25k
  • SI
    SADYTA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $23k

Funded once

  • 1A
    14TH AND COURT LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $182k
  • CD
    COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE
    one grant, 2024 · $170k
  • OL
    ONE LINCOLN PARK CONDO ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $56k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2021–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2021 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 139 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

14TH AND COURT LLC: $182,000 · Other14TH AND COURT LLCCOLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE: $170,000 · OtherCOLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE+137 more: $1,787,258 · Other+137 more
Other$2,139,258

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mile High United Way IncCO32.9× affinity24 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mile High United Way Inc · Colorado Restaurant Foundation · Dreamspring

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 139 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Denver Civic Ventures’ filings →

More from the funding graph