Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dennis & Ellin Murphy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

96% of Dennis & Ellin Murphy Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to University Of Notre Dame Du Lac, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Dennis & Ellin Murphy Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $49k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
17
10
18
13
19
9
20
8
21
9
22
14
23
7
24
6
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0178% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Education$686kReligion$38kHuman Services$36kHousing & Shelter$11kHealth$4kInternational$3kAnimals$2kCivil Rights$1kArts & Culture$1kOther$218k
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$218k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST$10,000
SACRED HEART SCHOOLS$5,000
ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES$4,000
ST ROBERT BELLARMINE SCHOOL$3,500
CHILDRENS SCHOLARSHIP FUND$2,500
SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE$2,500
RUSH OFFICE OF PHILANTHROPY$1,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$1,000
ST PATRICKS CHURCH$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
TACOMA HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
ST JOSEPH SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM AT NOTRE DAME$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EAST END HOSPICE: $3k → 7%GUADALUPE SOCIAL SERVICES: $2k → 10%HOSPICE OF DAYTON: $1k → 14%GUADALUPE SOCIAL SERVICES: $1k → 10%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $4k → 12%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $3k → 12%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $1k → 12%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $11k → 12%ESSENTIAL PREGNACY SERVICES: $4k → 12%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $1k → 12%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $1k → 12%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $1k → 12%CHILD SAVINGS INSTITUTE: $1k → 12%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA: $1k → 12%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA: $1k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
NJ
CT
CO
NE
MO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$315k · 28 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

28 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
61

Total granted

$315k
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+17%

Still filing today

46%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterAnimalsCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Marquette University
    7× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +46%
  • CF
    CUES FUND
    4× · 2020–2023 · $38k · revenue +21%
  • EE
    EPS ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +161%

Funded once

  • MH
    MARIAN HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF HOUSTON
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NAPLES
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
The Ku Endowment Charitable Gift Fund

To strengthen the University and communities that have touched the lives of KU alumni and friends, the mission of The KU Endowment Charitable Gift Fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable objectives of…

Philanthropy
3
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
4
Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation

The council of indepependent nebraska colleges foundation exists to provide operating funds and scholarship support for students attending nebraska's independent institutions of excellence.

5
Catholic Charities Foundation

Support the mission and social services programs of catholic charities of the archdiocese of omaha, inc.

Religion
6
Nebraska Pediatric Practice Inc

Provides a means whereby the resources, expertise, and knowledge of the pediatric specialty physicians can be marshaled to develop, promote, and make available to patients from omaha, ne and the surrounding area, pediatric, academic, and…

Health
7
Osteopathic Founders Foundation

The mission of the osteopathic founders foundation is to support osteopathic medical education, to enhance the public's understanding of osteopathic medicine, and to improve the health of the community through projects consistent with the…

Health
8
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
9
Unmc Physicians

Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.

Health
10
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
11
University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

12
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Saving Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Marquette University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Arts OrganizationsFood Pantries & AssistanceChild and Family ServicesCommunity FoundationsHospice Care ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Cancer Support OrganizationsPublic University Foundatio…Community Health CentersAnimal Rescue and AdoptionDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Faith-Based Senior LivingPregnancy Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr13%8%5–10yr18%11%10–20yr14%13%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr23%40%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%6%5–10yr18%6%10–20yr14%4%20–35yr13%80%35–55yr23%5%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/42
the rest of the field
10%
4,324/41,953

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
22/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of Notre Dame du Lac — $564,500 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacMarquette University — $54,700 · EducationMarquette UniversityOMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST — $40,000 · EducationOMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST+6 more — $26,500 · EducationAMERICAN RED CROSS — $22,500 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSSACRED HEART SCHOOLS — $20,000 · OtherSACRED HEART SCHOOLSIndividual grant recipient — $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA — $12,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHAMADONNA SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY BASED SERVICES — $10,000 · OtherMARIAN HIGH SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF HOUSTON — $10,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NAPLES — $10,000 · Other+76 more — $113,320 · Other+76 moreCUES FUND — $37,500 · ReligionEPS ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES INC — $25,500 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesEast End Hospice Inc — $2,500 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA INC — $2,000 · Human Services+3 more — $3,000 · Human ServicesNEW CASSEL FOUNDATION — $5,500 · Housing & ShelterSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,500 · HealthO'HANA HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · HealthBanner Alzheimer's Foundation — $1,000 · HealthTRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION — $500 · HealthEDUCATE UGANDA — $3,000 · International
Education$685,700Other$221,820Religion$37,500Human Services$36,000Housing & Shelter$10,500Health$4,000International$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $564,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMarquette University — $54,700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST — $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCUES FUND — $37,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetEPS ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES INC — $25,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND OF OMAHA — $21,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetNEW CASSEL FOUNDATION — $5,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBETHLEHEM HOUSE — $5,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATE UGANDA — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEast End Hospice Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetO'HANA HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBanner Alzheimer's Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF DAYTON INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA PUBLIC MEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac
  • Who funds Marquette University
  • Who funds OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST
  • Who funds CUES FUND
  • Who funds EPS ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND OF OMAHA
  • Who funds NEW CASSEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BETHLEHEM HOUSE
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE
  • Who funds EDUCATE UGANDA
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC
  • Who funds East End Hospice Inc
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND
  • Who funds POTOMAC FALLS BAND BOOSTERS INC
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Charles and Mary Heider Family FoundationNE26.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Cl Werner Foundation · D F Dillon Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Greater Horizons · Donald a & Joan M Cimpl Foundation · Robertson Family Foundation · Dr C C and Mabel L Criss Memorial · Eagle Foundation · Richard Brooke Foundation · Seline Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dennis & Ellin Murphy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dennis & Ellin Murphy Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Dennis & Ellin Murphy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 108 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph