Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dennis and Joyce Ruben Foundation

$245k
Granted FY2022
13
Grants FY2022
—
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it funds
0174% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Religion$740kHuman Services$70kPhilanthropy$64kHealth$51kCivil Rights$25kEducation$16kRecreation & Sports$8kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2022 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $99,872, the rows itemized in this filing. The $244,614 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $144,742 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k10 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $76k
$3,600
Median grant
—
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Chicago Center of Torah & Chesed$37,400
Chicago Chesed Fund$21,000
The Chicago Center$18,000
American Friends of N.A.$6,000
JDBY$5,180
American Friends of Bnei Levy$5,000
Arie Crown Hebrew Day School$3,600
Friendship Circle of MB$1,800
Sharsheret$1,000
Jewish Sacred Society$360
Lubavitch Chabad of Skokie$360
Lincolnwood Jewish Congregation$100
Hebrew Academy For Special Children$72
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHALVA: $360 → 14%LIBENU: $360 → 14%LIBENU: $250 → 14%LIBENU: $180 → 14%LIBENU FOUNDATION: $72 → 14%CHICAGO CHESED FUND: $20k → 14%CHICAGO CHESED FUND: $17k → 14%CHICAGO CHESED FUND: $10k → 14%CHICAGO CHESED FUND: $8k → 14%CHICAGO CHESED FUND: $8k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $360 → 14%SHALIVA: $540 → 14%SHALVA: $540 → 14%SHALVA: $180 → 14%SHALVA: $180 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
WI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$750k · 45 repeat orgs$372k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2022, 45 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
141

Total granted

$750k
$272k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+9%

Still filing today

22%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesReligionHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHICAGO CHESED FUND
    5× · 2017–2021 · $62k · revenue +87%
  • K
    KESHET
    2× · 2019–2021 · $31k · revenue +44%
  • CL
    CHAI LIFELINE INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $11k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • CK
    CONGREGATION KEHILAS YAAKOV
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $18k
  • CA
    CONG ATERES ELIEZER IF BISCAD
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
4
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Jewish Life Foundation
—
6
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
7
Sherit Isroel
—
8
University of Judaism Foundation
—
9
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
10
Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc

The jewish federation of greater atlanta cares for, connects and strengthens our jewish community throughout greater atlanta, israel and the world.

Philanthropy
11
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
12
Aish Hatorah Detroit

To ignite jewish passion and empower every jew to embrace their heritage, thereby ensuring the vibrant continuity of the jewish epople.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Netiv Aryeh Inc; the most unlike its peers is Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 202 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHICAGO CENTER FOR TORAH CHESED: $188,950 · OtherCHICAGO CENTER FOR TORAH CHESEDCHICAGO CENTER FOR TORAH & CHESED INC: $119,971 · OtherCHICAGO CENTER FOR TORAH & CHESED INCCHICAGO COMMUNITY KOLLEL INC: $77,348 · OtherCHICAGO COMMUNITY KOLLEL INCBAIS CHAIM DOVID: $55,646 · OtherBAIS CHAIM DOVIDChicago Center of Torah & Chesed: $37,400 · OtherTELSHE YESHIVA OF CHICAGO: $36,100 · Other+178 more: $519,682 · Other+178 moreCHICAGO CHESED FUND: $62,320 · Human Services+3 more: $3,022 · Human ServicesJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $22,180 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $1,040 · Philanthropy+1 more: $72 · PhilanthropyCHAI LIFELINE INC: $11,000 · Health+2 more: $500 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETIV ARYEH INC: $1,800 · ReligionJEWISH SACRED SOCIETY INC: $1,080 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT OROT INC: $1,000 · ReligionCHICAGO MIKVAH ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 · ReligionCAMP NAGEELA MIDWEST INC: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsMAOT CHITIM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC: $1,540 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,035,097Human Services$65,342Philanthropy$23,292Health$11,500Religion$4,880Recreation & Sports$2,500Food & Nutrition$1,540

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHICAGO CHESED FUND: $62,320 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetKESHET: $31,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $22,180 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC MENDS MINDS INC: $2,250 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSHALVA INC: $1,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETIV ARYEH INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAOT CHITIM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC: $1,540 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH SACRED SOCIETY INC: $1,080 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $1,040 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT OROT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYESHIVA DERECH HATORAH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLIBENU: $862 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME: $432 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDELEGATION OF JEWISH AMERICAN STUDENTS (DOJAS): $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Child and Family Services: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHASC PA INC: $72 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHICAGO CHESED FUND ↗
  • Who funds KESHET ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL36.4× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Bitton Family Foundation Inc · Aj & Sl Stern Family Foundation · Todd a and Raphaela Stern Family Foundation · Elliott and Ronni Charitable Fdn · Jewish Communal Fund · Bellows Family Foundation · Daniel & Chayala Glenner Foundation · Sidney and Lisa Glenner Foundation · Noah Wolff Family Foundation Inc · Lev Zahav NFP · Alice G Hanson Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dennis and Joyce Ruben Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dennis and Joyce Ruben Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 202 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dennis and Joyce Ruben’s filings →

    More from the funding graph