Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dennis & Janice Kumb Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$400
Largest
01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$70kHuman Services$9kFood & Nutrition$7kReligion$7kEducation$6kRecreation & Sports$6kAnimals$5kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$200
Median grant
4
States reached
$150k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAKE BEULAH SAINING SCHOOL$400
TROY CENTER FIRE DEPT$300
VERTERANS OF FOREIGN WARS$300
MUKWONAGO FOOD PANTRY$200
AARP FOUNDATION$100
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$100
LAKELAND ANIMAL SHELTER$100
NATIONAL SHRINE OF ST JUDE$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Boys Town: $300 → 12%Downtown womens center: $500 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 14%The Women's Center: $5k → 5%life's connection: $1k → 5%Life's Connection: $500 → 5%LIFE'S CONNECTION: $400 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
SD
CA
NE
MO
MD
AZ
KS
TN
DC
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$89k · 19 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
56

Total granted

$89k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+19%

Still filing today

42%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $800 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $54k · revenue +53%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue +78%
  • LC
    LIFE'S CONNECTION INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $2k · revenue +241%

Funded once

  • TW
    THE WOMEN'S CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +4%
  • WM
    WEST MILWAUKEE LIONS CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WIgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

2
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
3
Wisconsin Association of Health Plans Inc

Promote a positive state legislative and regulatory climate for wisconsin's community health plans. the association communicates with regulatory agencies to promote issue positions representing community health plans.

4
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
5
Wisconsin Center for Nursing Inc

The mission of wisconsin center for nursing, inc. is to assure an adequate, well-prepared and diverse nurse workforce for the people of wisconsin. the work of the wisconsin center for nursing continues to be focused in five core nursing…

Arts & Culture
6
Goodwill Industries of North Central Wisconsin Inc

Eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are underserved, underrepresented and disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.

Human Services
7
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

8
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

9
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

10
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
11
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
12
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Wisconsin Inc and the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsVeteran Support ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Child and Family ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringAnimal Rescue and AdoptionDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Food Pantries & Assistance
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%4%<5yr12%7%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr16%36%35–55yr19%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%1%<5yr12%2%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr16%3%20–35yr16%74%35–55yr19%14%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
8%
3,022/36,495

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
21/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC — $53,500 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $3,100 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $2,500 · Health+4 more — $3,350 · Health+4 moreIndividual grant recipient — $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWEST MILWAUKEE LIONS CLUB — $5,000 · OtherWEST MILWAUKEE LIONS CLUBCURSILLO IN CHRISTIANITY OF THE ARC HDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE — $3,400 · OtherCURSILLO IN CHRISTIANITY OF THE ARC HDIOCES…ST MARK'S EV LUTHREN CHURCH — $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,000 · OtherSt Peter catholic School — $1,750 · Other+50 more — $26,175 · Other+50 moreTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesLIFE'S CONNECTION INC — $1,900 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER — $500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $400 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $300 · Human Services+1 more — $100 · Human ServicesMUKWONAGO FOOD PANTRY — $3,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI — $2,500 · Food & NutritionHUMANE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $1,650 · AnimalsWISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,250 · AnimalsEMMA LOVES DOGS INC — $1,000 · AnimalsDyslexia Reading Connection Inc — $2,000 · EducationBLACK GIRLS CODE INC — $1,000 · Education4th Dimension Sobriety Inc — $1,000 · PhilanthropyMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $200 · International
Health$62,450Other$52,325Human Services$8,200Food & Nutrition$5,500Animals$3,900Education$3,000Philanthropy$1,000International$200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC — $53,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $3,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUKWONAGO FOOD PANTRY — $3,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDyslexia Reading Connection Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLIFE'S CONNECTION INC — $1,900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $1,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $1,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD PANTRY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANN'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget4th Dimension Sobriety Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBLACK GIRLS CODE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMMA LOVES DOGS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALS ASSOCIATION INC WISCONSIN CHAPTER — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEaster Seals Southeast Wisconsin Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds MUKWONAGO FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC
  • Who funds Dyslexia Reading Connection Inc
  • Who funds LIFE'S CONNECTION INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds HUMANE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC
  • Who funds FOOD PANTRY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC
  • Who funds WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds ANN'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds 4th Dimension Sobriety Inc
  • Who funds BLACK GIRLS CODE INC
  • Who funds EMMA LOVES DOGS INC
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI20× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Waukesha County Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dennis & Janice Kumb Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dennis & Janice Kumb Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dennis & Janice Kumb Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph