Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dena and Eric Frankfurt Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$186kPhilanthropy$45kHuman Services$26kHealth$21kReligion$20kInternational$11kAnimals$10kArts & Culture$270Other$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $68k
$26,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$150k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Marks School of Texas$30,000
Akiba Yavneh Academy$26,000
Friends of the Israel Defense Force$11,800
The Crystal Charity Ball$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Jewish Family Service: $19k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$248k · 6 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
13

Total granted

$248k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+65%

Still filing today

33%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    St Marks Fund
    6× · 2019–2024 · $111k
  • AA
    AKIBAYAVNEH ACADEMY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $102k · revenue +13%
  • FO
    Friends of Israel
    2× · 2022–2023 · $11k

Funded once

  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $19k · revenue +65%
  • SN
    Seminar Network
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Torah Day School of Dallas

Torah Day School of Dallas is a day school for jewish children grades kindergarden through eigth grade along with pre-school for one through four year old jewish children. The school provides a general studies and secular education meeting…

Education
2
Texas Jewish Security Initiative
Crime & Legal
3
Mesorah High School for Girls Inc

Mesorah High School for Girls of Dallas is a Jewish high school for girls. The school provides high school and pre college level secular and general education meeting the requirements of the Texas Education code along with providing judiac…

Education
4
Dallas Jewish Community Foundation

To be your partner and trusted expert in charitable giving and effective philanthropy by empowering our community's charitable vision, safeguarding our community's resources and building enduring legacies.

Philanthropy
5
Jewish Community Center of Dallas

The jcc of dallas brings the community together by providing state of the art facilities and exceptional programs in an inclusive environment defined by jewish values and culture.

Recreation & Sports
6
Akiba Academy of Dallas

Akiba academy provides a superior general and judaic education to children pre-school through eighth grade. as a modern orthodox school, akiba develops ethical and responsible members of the jewish people and american society,…

—
7
Jewish Day School of Metropolitan Seattle

Jds is committed to providing an innovative academic program through a rigorous integrated, inquiry-based curriculum with general & judaic studies, empowering children to grow into capable, wise, and compassionate upstanders.

Education
8
Jewish Community Center Endowment Fund

The Jewish Community Center Endowment Fund was created to support the programs and operations of the Evelyn Rubenstein Jewish Community Center of Houston.

Religion
9
Hillel of Dallas

To enrich the lives of jewish students and young adults in the dallas area so they may enrich the jewish people around the world and to provide opportunities to explore and celebrate their jewish identities.

—
10
Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School

Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…

—
11
Jewish Family Service of Greater Dallas Foundation

The Jewish Family Service of Greater Dallas Foundation is operated to support Jewish Family Service of Dallas, Inc. (JFS). The Foundation provides general and restricted support to assist JFS in fulfilling its mission to provide…

Human Services
12
Austin Jewish Academy

Our mission is to create a better world by raising students to their full academic, social, physical and spiritual potential guided by timeless jewish values and traditions.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Dallas; the most unlike its peers is Akibayavneh Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Marks Fund: $111,000 · OtherSt Marks FundCONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND: $20,000 · OtherCONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDSeminar Network: $12,500 · OtherSeminar NetworkFriends of the Israel Defense Force: $11,800 · OtherFriends of the Israel Defense ForceFriends of Israel: $11,000 · OtherEQUEST: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+9 more: $21,550 · Other+9 moreAKIBAYAVNEH ACADEMY: $102,200 · EducationAKIBAYAVNEH ACADEMYST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $30,000 · EducationST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXASJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $26,500 · PhilanthropyTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $1,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $19,000 · Human ServicesTHE LEGACY SENIOR COMMUNITIES INC: $1,800 · Arts & CultureDallas Jewish Historical Society: $270 · Arts & Culture
Other$207,850Education$132,200Philanthropy$28,000Human Services$19,000Arts & Culture$2,070

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAKIBAYAVNEH ACADEMY: $102,200 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $26,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $19,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEQUEST: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LEGACY SENIOR COMMUNITIES INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDallas Jewish Historical Society: $270 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AKIBAYAVNEH ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds EQUEST ↗
  • Who funds THE LEGACY SENIOR COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Jewish Historical Society ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jeff & Bonnie Whitman Charitable FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jeff & Bonnie Whitman Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dena and Eric Frankfurt Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dena and Eric Frankfurt Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dena and Eric Frankfurt Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph