Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Delucia Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2026still arriving
13
Grants FY2026still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2026.

Health$215kEducation$196kArts & Culture$65kYouth Development$55kPhilanthropy$44kEnvironment$24kRecreation & Sports$20kReligion$18kOther$0
02FY2026 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k5 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $90k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORWALK RIVER ROWING ASSOCIATION$20,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF AMERICA$10,200
SHEPHERDS INC$10,000
ST JUDES CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$10,000
FILMAKERS COLLABORATIVE$10,000
THE TEDDY BALKIND CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$10,000
CYCLE FOR SURVIVAL$10,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING HOSPITAL$10,000
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$6,000
UC DAVIS FOUNDATION$5,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$2,000
FLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION$1,000
SHRINERS CHILDREN'S$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–26, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
CT
CA
MD
DE
KS
NC
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$543k · 18 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2026, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
13

Total granted

$543k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+19%

Still filing today

56%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEnvironmentAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2026 · $115k · revenue +6%
  • NY
    NEW YORK WOMEN IN FILM & TELEVISION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +52%
  • YN
    YALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL
    3× · 2021–2023 · $40k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • NF
    NEWTOWN FOREST ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $20k · revenue +40%
  • TB
    THE BRADY UROLOGICAL INSTITUTE AT JOHN HOPKINS
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
11
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
12
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Teddy Balkind Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation Organizat…Cancer Support OrganizationsVeteran Support ServicesRotary Club FoundationsFallen First Responder Supp…Child and Family ServicesSchool Parent OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionYouth Ice Hockey ProgramsClassical Music EnsemblesIndependent K-8 SchoolsPublic University Foundatio…Community Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%9%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%60%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,539

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
15/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST JUDES CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $75,000 · OtherST JUDES CHILDREN'S HOSPITALNEW YORK WOMEN IN FILM & TELEVISION INC — $40,000 · OtherNEW YORK WOMEN IN FILM & TELEVISION INCGIRL SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $24,900 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF AMERICAREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — $20,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIAJOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · OtherJOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITYREFORM UNIVERSITY FELLOWSHIP — $18,000 · OtherREFORM UNIVERSITY FELLOWSHIPEASTERSEALS - MATTHEW JAMESON FUND — $15,000 · OtherEASTERSEALS — $15,000 · OtherPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $11,500 · OtherALS THERAPY DEVELOPEMENT INSTITUTE — $11,000 · OtherTHE BRADY UROLOGICAL INSTITUTE AT JOHN HOPKINS — $10,000 · Other+6 more — $20,850 · Other+6 moreTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION — $115,000 · EducationTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATIONSHEPHERDS INC — $20,000 · EducationSHEPHERDS INCWASHINGTON MONTESSORI ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 · EducationWASHINGTON MONTESSORI ASSO…+3 more — $8,000 · EducationMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $60,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KET…YALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL — $40,000 · HealthYALE NEW HAVEN HOS…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $6,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer…+1 more — $1,000 · HealthThe Teddy Balkind Charitable Foundation — $40,000 · PhilanthropyPERSON TO PERSON INC — $2,500 · PhilanthropyDAVIS SUNRISE ROTARY FOUNDATION — $1,500 · Philanthropy+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyNEWTOWN FOREST ASSOCIATION INC — $20,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $3,500 · EnvironmentTHE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureNORWALK RIVER ROWING ASSOCIATION — $20,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$281,250Education$153,000Health$107,000Philanthropy$45,000Environment$23,500Arts & Culture$20,000Recreation & Sports$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION — $115,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $60,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Teddy Balkind Charitable Foundation — $40,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetNEW YORK WOMEN IN FILM & TELEVISION INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetYALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL — $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSHEPHERDS INC — $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $11,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON MONTESSORI ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MR HOLLAND'S OPUS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPERSON TO PERSON INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAVIS SUNRISE ROTARY FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetERHS PTA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSwim Across America Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Delucia Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Person to Person Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Florida Sheriffs Association Inc — 4% of income from government
  • The Filmmakers Collaborative Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Yale New Haven Hospital — 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Delucia Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Delucia Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines