Skip to content
Delta Foundation for Rehabilitation and Research at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Delta Foundation for Rehabilitation and Research

To identify those needs of people with acquired disability from traumatic brain injury that are not met by present social, medical and government programs and to develop and implement strategies for responding to those needs with the goal of providing the missing elements necessary to better assure the individual's ability to make the…

$488k
Granted FY2022
17
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2022.

Health$95kYouth Development$95kEducation$90kHuman Services$80kFood & Nutrition$55kArts & Culture$35kEmployment$20kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0
02FY2022 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k14 grants · $265k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $215k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SNOHOMISH BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$95,000
EMERSON ELEMENTARY PTA$70,000
SNOHOMISH SENIOR CENTER$50,000
BRAIN INJURY ALLIANCE OF WASHINGTON$40,000
THE SNOHOMISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY$35,000
WORLD FOOD PROGRAM$25,000
SEATTLE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$25,000
SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$20,000
BRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER$20,000
SNOHOMISH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$20,000
SHERWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES$20,000
SNOHOMISH COMMUNITY KITCHEN$10,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF EVERETT$10,000
LIGHTHOUSE MISSION MINISTRIES$10,000
CAMP KOREY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $25k → 14%BRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER: $20k → 9%SNOHOMISH SENIOR CENTER: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
2
Afl-Cio Snohomish & Island County Labor Council

Member, affiliate, and community education for worker's issues - union and non-union

—
3
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
4
Community Foundation of Snohomish County

The Community Foundation of Snohomish County (the Foundation) is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington. The Foundation serves as a community foundation, supporting a broad spectrum of…

Philanthropy
5
Snohomish Little League

To implant firmly in the children of the snohomish community the ideal of good sportsmanship, honesty, loyalty, courage and respect for authority, so that they may be well adjusted, stronger and happier chidren and will grow to be good,…

Recreation & Sports
6
Workforce Development Council Snohomish County

Workforce snohomish invests government and private funding to continuously increase the global competitiveness and prosperity of our businesses and workforce, to fill current and emerging jobs, and to provide full employment. our…

Education
7
Arc of Snohomish County

To serve individuals with developmental disabilities and their families

—
8
Snohomish Seniors

To promote and enhance the physical, emotional and social well being of older adults in the greater city of snohomish area by offering activities and services for the education, information and fellowship of its members.

Unclassified
9
Snohomish County-Camano Association of Realtors

Representing real estate agents and brokers in Snohomish County and Camano Island, Washington, the Association provides its members with resources, education, and support to help them excel in their careers and serve their clients…

—
10
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
11
Snohomish County Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

To provide food, shelter, clothing and other services to people in need in our community.

Human Services
12
Stilly-Snohomish Fisheries Enhancement Task Force Dba Sound Salmon Solutions

To ensure the future of salmon in the stillaguamish and snohomish river basins and island county watersheds.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Services of Snohomish County; the most unlike its peers is Bridge Receiving Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EMERSON ELEMENTARY PTA: $70,000 · OtherEMERSON ELEMENTARY PTASNOHOMISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $35,000 · OtherSNOHOMISH HISTORICAL SOCIETYSeattle Children's Foundation: $25,000 · OtherSeattle Children's FoundationSNOHOMISH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $20,000 · OtherSNOHOMISH COMMUNITY FOOD BANKLIGHTHOUSE MISSION MINISTRIES: $10,000 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE MISSION MINISTRIESCOMMUNITY KITCHEN A CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY KITCHEN A CHARITABLE FOUNDATI…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $95,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF …CAMP KOREY: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP KOREYSENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $50,000 · Human ServicesSENIOR SERVICES OF SN…FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD …BRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER: $20,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGE RECEIVING CENT…BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON: $40,000 · HealthBRAIN INJURY …SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $20,000 · HealthSEATTLE CHILD…SHERWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20,000 · EmploymentKIWANIS CLUB OF SNOHOMISH CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationSNOHOMISH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationSNOHOMISH LIONS CLUB: $10,000 · Community ImprovementASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF EVERETT: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$170,000Youth Development$105,000Human Services$95,000Health$60,000Employment$20,000Education$20,000Community Improvement$10,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $95,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON: $40,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHERWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSNOHOMISH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetKIWANIS CLUB OF SNOHOMISH CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetCAMP KOREY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSNOHOMISH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF EVERETT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Norcliffe Foundat…Puget Sound Energy Fo…The Albertsons Compan…Community Foundation …Employees Community F…The Nysether Family F…Employees Community F…The Blackbaud Giving …Network for GoodThe Pfizer Foundation…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…
The Norcliffe FoundationWA19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Community Foundation of Snohomish County · Employees Community Fund of Boeing-Puget Sound · The Nysether Family Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Delta Foundation for Rehabilitation and Research funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Delta Foundation for Rehabilitation and Research. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports $155k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Delta Foundation for Rehabilitation and Research’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home