Skip to content

· Private foundation

Delsa Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$91k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$521kCrime & Legal$26kScience & Tech$24kArts & Culture$24kCommunity Improvement$18kYouth Development$13kPhilanthropy$10kAnimals$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $52k
$4,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ROLLA$12,000
PHELPS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF MISSOURI$10,000
EAST CENTRAL COLLEGE$10,000
FINE LINEN THEATRE$10,000
DEN PHELPS RIII SCHOOL DISTRICT$5,000
HOPE OF THE OZARKS$5,000
MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY$4,000
LINCOLN UNIVERSITY$4,000
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLUMBIA$4,000
COLUMBIA COLLEGE OF MO$4,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON$2,000
OZARKS TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF INDIANA$2,000
PHELPS COUNTY ANIMAL RESCUE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $12k → 16%CAMP DAVID OF THE OZARKS: $5k → 16%THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $3k → 16%THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $3k → 16%GREATER ROLLA AREA CHARITABLE ENTERPRISE: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
NY
IN
PA
MO
KY
TN
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of Delsa Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in MO; by stated purpose, 79%.

Delsa Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$382k · 33 repeat orgs$295k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
73

Total granted

$382k
$269k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+12%

Still filing today

18%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP
    3× · 2019–2022 · $18k · revenue +33%
  • FL
    Fine Linen Theatre
    3× · 2022–2024 · $17k · revenue +131%
  • UO
    University of Miami
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • DR
    DIXON R1 SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • R
    RTIRTC
    one grant, 2018 · $16k
  • PC
    PHELPS COUNTY R-III
    one grant, 2019 · $16k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
2
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
3
Coe College

Coe college is a private, four-year co-educational liberal arts college.

Education
4
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
5
Pomona College

Throughout its history, pomona college has educated men and women of exceptional promise. we gather individuals, regardless of financial circumstances, into a small residential community that is strongly rooted in southern california yet…

Education
6
Benedictine College

Benedictine college's mission as a catholic, benedictine, liberal arts, residential college is the education of men and women within a community of faith & scholarship.

Education
7
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
8
Missouri Valley College

Guiding students to succeed through personal instruction and intellectual inquiry.

Education
9
Mcdaniel College Inc

Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…

Education
10
Arkansas Colleges of Health Education

See schedule o for complete description - the mission of the arkansas colleges of health education (ache) is to educate and train a diverse group of highly competent and compassionate healthcare professionals; to create health and research…

Education
11
The President and Trustees of Colby College

to provide a rigorous and transformative liberal arts education that prepares students to become thoughtful, engaged citizens.

Education
12
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Partnership; the most unlike its peers is Phelps County Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 114 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DIXON R-I SCHOOLS: $60,413 · OtherDIXON R-I SCHOOLSNEWBURG R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT: $30,066 · OtherRTIRTC - ROLLA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $26,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ROLLA: $24,000 · OtherSTATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF MISSOURI: $22,000 · OtherDIXON R1 SCHOOL DISTRICT: $19,896 · Other+96 more: $411,504 · Other+96 moreCamp David of the Ozarks Inc: $26,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $18,000 · Human ServicesGREATER ROLLA AREA CHARITABLE ENTER: $2,000 · Human ServicesFine Linen Theatre: $17,000 · Arts & CultureKALEIDOSCOPE DISCOVERY CENTER: $3,000 · Arts & CultureCOLUMBIA COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationUniversity of Miami: $4,000 · EducationCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $2,000 · EducationLINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM: $2,000 · EducationPhelps County Animal Rescue: $2,000 · AnimalsDays For Girls International: $2,000 · InternationalHOPEY'S HEART FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Health
Other$593,879Human Services$46,000Arts & Culture$20,000Education$12,000Animals$2,000International$2,000Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCamp David of the Ozarks Inc: $26,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $18,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFine Linen Theatre: $17,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetASS FOR: $13,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetCOLUMBIA COLLEGE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPhelps County Animal Rescue: $2,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetDays For Girls International: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER ROLLA AREA CHARITABLE ENTER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEY'S HEART FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Camp David of the Ozarks Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds Fine Linen Theatre ↗
  • Who funds ASS FOR ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Delsa Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Delsa Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Delsa Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Delsa Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 114 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Delsa’s filings →

More from the funding graph