Skip to content

· Private foundation

Deeks Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$1.0M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

70% of Deeks Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’17
0
’18
0
’19
0
’20
0
’21
0
’22
0
’23
5
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0163% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.0MAnimals$374kEducation$21kEnvironment$11kHealth$4kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.4M
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MS GIFT INC$1,000,000
PELICAN HARBOR SEABIRD STATION$358,500
HORIZONS NATIONAL STUDENT ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INC$20,000
THE MIAMI FOUNDATION - MIAMI GIVING$10,000
RANCH HANDS RESCUE$10,000
WILDCOAST$10,000
A FOREVER HOME RESCUE$5,000
THE ANDY BOVIN MEMORIAL FUND$3,000
WOMEN'S CLUB$3,000
THE NATURE CONSERVATORY$700
SYLVESTER CANCER CENTER$500
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WILDCOAST: $10k → 11%MS GIFT INC: $1.0M → 9%THE ANDY BOVIN MEMORIAL FUND: $3k → 17%RANCH HANDS RESCUE: $10k → 8%SEE ATTACHED: $1.4M → 15%HORIZONS NATIONAL STUDENT ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INC: $20k → 9%THE NATURE CONSERVATORY: $700 → 7%SEE ATTACHED: $756k → 15%SEE ATTACHED: $459k → 15%SEE ATTACHED: $446k → 15%SEE ATTACHED: $391k → 15%SEE ATTACHED: $116k → 15%SEE ATTACHED: $90k → 15%WOMEN'S CLUB: $3k → 15%SYLVESTER CANCER CENTER: $500 → 15%THE MIAMI FOUNDATION - MIAMI GIVING: $10k → 15%PELICAN HARBOR SEABIRD STATION: $359k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
1/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC: $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INCPELICAN HARBOR SEABIRD STATION INC: $358,500 · AnimalsPELICAN HARBOR SEABIRD STATIO…+1 more: $10,000 · AnimalsTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION - MIAMI GIVING: $10,000 · OtherA FOREVER HOME RESCUE: $5,000 · OtherWOMEN'S CLUB: $3,000 · OtherTHE ANDY BOVIN MEMORIAL FUND: $3,000 · Other+2 more: $1,200 · OtherHORIZONS NATIONAL STUDENT ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentWILDCOAST: $10,000 · EnvironmentUniversity of Miami: $500 · Education
Philanthropy$1,000,000Animals$368,500Other$22,200Youth Development$20,000Environment$10,000Education$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPELICAN HARBOR SEABIRD STATION INC: $358,500 over 1y, 11% of budgetHORIZONS NATIONAL STUDENT ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWILDCOAST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRanch Hands Rescue: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Deeks Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Deeks Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Deeks’ filings →

More from the funding graph