Skip to content

· Private foundation

Deborah a Hawkins Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$145k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Arts & Culture$563kHuman Services$275kYouth Development$75kEnvironment$70kHealth$40kPhilanthropy$20kEducation$20kCivil Rights$15kOther$0
02FY2023 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS$50,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA$15,000
XAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA$10,000
DILLARD UNIVERSITY$10,000
WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
NEADS INC$10,000
ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY$10,000
THE SILK ROAD PROJECT$10,000
UNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY$5,000
ATLANTIC CLASSICAL ORCHESTRA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $270k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEADS: $220k → 11%NEADS: $20k → 11%NEADS: $10k → 11%NEADS INC: $10k → 11%NEADS: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$942k · 9 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$942k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+33%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NI
    NEADS INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $270k · revenue +19%
  • AF
    ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $75k · revenue +83%
  • MI
    Metalwerx Inc
    2× · 2020–2022 · $50k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • NF
    NEADSDOGS FOR DEAF AND DISABLED AMERICANS
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MA
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • PP
    PLIMOTH PATUXET MUSEUMS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
3
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
4
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
7
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
8
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
9
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
12
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wildlands Trust Inc; the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DECORDOVA MUSEUM: $457,000 · OtherDECORDOVA MUSEUM+8 more: $66,000 · Other+8 moreNEADS INC: $270,000 · Human ServicesNEADS INCARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureARTISTS FOR H…SILK ROAD PROJECT INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureSILK ROAD PRO…FILMNORTH: $15,000 · Arts & CultureFILMNORTHPLIMOTH PATUXET MUSEUMS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CulturePLIMOTH PATUX…ATLANTIC CLASSICAL ORCHESTRA INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureMetalwerx Inc: $50,000 · EducationDILLARD UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationXAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA: $10,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $50,000 · EnvironmentWILDLANDS TRUST INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INC: $15,000 · Civil RightsWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $10,000 · Science & Tech
Other$523,000Human Services$270,000Arts & Culture$130,000Education$70,000Environment$70,000Civil Rights$15,000Science & Tech$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEADS INC: $270,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMetalwerx Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSILK ROAD PROJECT INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWILDLANDS TRUST INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFILMNORTH: $15,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDILLARD UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLIMOTH PATUXET MUSEUMS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTIC CLASSICAL ORCHESTRA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Deborah a Hawkins Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Deborah a Hawkins Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution: 63% of income from government
  • Wildlands Trust Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Silk Road Project Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Artists for Humanity Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Neads Inc: 1% of income from government
  • United Way of Indian River County Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Plimoth Patuxet Museums Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Metalwerx Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Deborah a Hawkins’ filings →

More from the funding graph