· Private foundation
Dearborn Mid-West Conveyor Company Commitment to Community Service Fo
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Taylor Family Resource Center | $6,100 |
| St Joseph Helpers | $5,000 |
| JD White Play Foundation | $2,500 |
| Fish and Loaves | $2,500 |
| CS Motts Childrens Hospital | $1,254 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Taylor Schools | $1,000 |
| Ocatavian Opera | $1,000 |
| Mimis Mission | $1,000 |
| Downriver Foster Closet | $1,000 |
| Karmanos Cancer Institute | $500 |
| Make A Wish | $500 |
| PLAA | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +96% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTAYLOR SCHOOL DISTRICT2× · 2023–2024 · $17k
- SJST JOSEPH HELPERS3× · 2022–2025 · $11k · revenue +544%
- FRFirst Romanian Pentecostal Church2× · 2022–2023 · $11k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $5k
- JKJoe kocur Foundationone grant, 2022 · $4k
- WMWEst Middle School PSPTaylorSchoolsone grant, 2022 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide assistance, awareness and advocacy in communication sciences & disorders
Provide opportunities for children with disabilities to play baseball
The mission of lending hands is to lend various kinds of home medical and other related equipment, for free and on a temporary basis, to anyone living in our service area without regard to age, race, sex, creed, income or disability.
The mission of harm reduction is to reduce substance abuse and related activities in a respectful manner in collaboration with the user
Sports for children with special needs. special abilities coalition activities that include awareness and advocacy for the special needs population.
To assist physically challenged and/or developmentally delayed individuals with sporting activities in a safe environment where they can learn and interact with peers.
Mission is to represent the interests and professional needs of psychiatric physicians in michigan while striving to ensure quality care for people with mental disorders and their families through promotion of education, research and…
Social welfare and issue advocacy
Service to families with deaf or hard of hearing children.
To provide education and consultations that are family-centered and to ensure continued family involvement in mental health care through advocacy and provider network.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Miracle League of Plymouth Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST JOSEPH HELPERS ↗
- Who funds MIMI'S MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds University of Michigan ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN WITH HAIR LOSS INC ↗
- Who funds FISH & LOAVES ↗
- Who funds ARC Downriver Inc ↗
- Who funds Hartland Robotics ↗
- Who funds MIRACLE LEAGUE OF PLYMOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dte Energy Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dearborn Mid-West Conveyor Company Commitment to Community Service Fo funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Dearborn Mid-West Conveyor Company Commitment to Community Service Fo?
Find your warmest path to Dearborn Mid-West Conveyor Company Commitment to Community Service Fo through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.