Skip to content

· Private foundation

Deane & Susan Penn Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2021
3
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$4k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

67% of Deane & Susan Penn Foundation Inc’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’19
5
’20
1
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2021.

Philanthropy$22kReligion$16kCivil Rights$12kEducation$11kHealth$7kHuman Services$6kRecreation & Sports$1k
02FY2021 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$270k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PENN FUND UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$4,000
ADLER APHASIA CENTER$1,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF BERGEN COUNTY AND NORTH HUDSON$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 36% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PENN FUND UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $4k → 22%JCPA (JEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS ): $5k → 17%ISRAEL CANCER ASSOCIATION: $2k → 11%VESTIBULAR DISORDERS ASSOCIATION: $250 → 12%JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%RUTGERS HILLEL: $600 → 8%ST JOSEPH INDIAN SCHOOL: $150 → 15%PENN FUND UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $4k → 22%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS: $5k → 17%JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%PENN FUND UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $3k → 22%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS: $1k → 17%KAPLEN JCC ON THE PALISADES: $5k → 7%PENN CHAMPIONS CLUB: $750 → 22%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS: $1k → 17%KAPLEN JCC ON THE PALISADES: $4k → 7%PENN HILLEL: $500 → 22%KAPLEN JCC ON THE PALISADES: $638 → 7%PENN CHAMPIONS CLUB: $500 → 22%CHAVURAH BETH SHALOM: $3k → 7%PENN HILLEL: $500 → 22%CHAVURAH BETH SHALOM: $3k → 7%JFNNJ (JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY): $10k → 7%JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY: $10k → 7%JFNNJ (JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY): $2k → 7%ADLER APHASIA CENTER: $3k → 7%ADLER APHASIA CENTER: $2k → 7%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF BERGEN COUNTY AND NORTH HUDSON: $1k → 7%ADLER APHASIA CENTER: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18k · 5 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2021, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$18k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
0%

Still filing today

20%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    CHAVURAH BETH SHALOM INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $6k
  • AA
    ADLER APHASIA CENTER
    3× · 2019–2021 · $5k · revenue -3%
  • JH
    JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $5k

Funded once

  • KJ
    KAPLEN JCC ON THE PALISADES
    one grant, 2020 · $9k
  • JC
    JEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue 0%
  • J(
    JCPA (JEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS )
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KAPLEN JCC ON THE PALISADES: $9,238 · OtherKAPLEN JCC ON THE PALISADESJEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC: $7,000 · OtherJEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS INCCHAVURAH BETH SHALOM INC: $5,500 · OtherCHAVURAH BETH SHALOM INCJCPA (JEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS ): $5,000 · OtherJCPA (JEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS )JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION: $4,880 · OtherJEWISH HOME FOUNDATIONISRAEL CANCER ASSOCIATION: $1,500 · OtherPENN CHAMPIONS CLUB: $1,250 · Other+4 more: $2,750 · Other+4 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $21,950 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE…ADLER APHASIA CENTER: $5,050 · HealthVESTIBULAR DISORDERS ASSOCIATION: $250 · Health
Other$37,118Philanthropy$21,950Education$10,500Health$5,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $21,950 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetADLER APHASIA CENTER: $5,050 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRutgers Hillel Corporation: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVESTIBULAR DISORDERS ASSOCIATION: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC ↗
  • Who funds ADLER APHASIA CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Rutgers Hillel Corporation ↗
  • Who funds VESTIBULAR DISORDERS ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Deane & Susan Penn Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Deane & Susan Penn Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Adler Aphasia Center: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Deane & Susan Penn’s filings →

More from the funding graph