Skip to content

· Public charity

Deaf Organizations Fund

Deaf Organizations Fund (dof) believes in a future in which deaf communities have access to a wide array of services provided by thriving, well-resourced organizations.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Education$45kCrime & Legal$40kHealth$35kYouth Development$25kInternational$25kArts & Culture$20kHuman Services$20k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $100,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $105,400 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,400 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Atomic Hands$25,000
Deaf Defy Inc$25,000
Deafinitely Inc$25,000
The Deaf Black Project$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Deaf Equity: $20k → 14%Deaf Inc (Deaf Empowerment Awareness Foundation Inc): $10k → 11%Deaf Defy Inc: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
CA
MO
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Deaf Research Institute

create, develop, and conduct deaf focus assessment and data gathering

International
2
Deaf Equality

To achieve equality for all Deaf, DeafBlind, DeafDisabled, Hard of Hearing, and Late Deafened people in the United States and worldwide.

Civil Rights
3
Deaf and Hard of Hearing Service Center

To advocate, seek equality, and promote self-determination through empowerment for those who seek our assistance; and to enhance the awareness and understanding of the deaf culture and the unique communication needs of the deaf and hard of…

Health
4
Woodall Foundation
Recreation & Sports
5
Deaf Austin Theatre

As a non-profit organization, Deaf Austin Theatre's purpose is to enrich, inspire, educate, create, and entertain the Austin community by using American Sign Language (ASL) within all of our theatrical productions that range from classics…

Arts & Culture
6
Agape Love Deaf International Inc

The mission for the organization is to promote and improve deaf culture, education, knowledge and skill via language research,education aids, scholarship, humanitarian aids, public education and awareness programs.

Human Services
7
Autism Deaf Empowerment Advocacy Foundation Inc

To serve as a resource and referral center for families of children with disabilities and all other people with disabilities. we help these individuals access and understand their rights so that they can experience optimal success in their…

—
8
Deaf Granny Arts

Deaf Granny Arts exists to support Deaf artists in their effort to spread awareness and foster understanding of Deaf people and visual communication. We do this by way of art. Our projects seek to bridge communication gaps between Deaf and…

Arts & Culture
9
Inclusive Fashion & Design Foundation

To increase the impact of beautiful, functional products in our everyday lives and in the global economy.

Civil Rights
10
National Deaf Interscholastic Athletic Association
Recreation & Sports
11
Deaf Services Center Inc

To empower the Deaf and Hard of Hearing people and to promote access to communication, services, and events in Central, Southern, and Northwest Ohio.

Health
12
Deaf Education Awareness Foundation

To help hearing impaired individuals.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Deafinitely Inc; the most unlike its peers is Deaf Spotlight. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
2/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ATOMIC HANDS: $45,000 · EducationATOMIC HANDSThe Black Deaf Project: $25,000 · EducationThe Black Deaf ProjectDeaf Defy Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesDeaf Defy IncDEAF EQUITY: $20,000 · Human ServicesDEAF EQUITYDEAF EMPOWERMENT AWARENESS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesDEAF EMPOWERMENT AWARENESS FO…HELPING EDUCATE TO ADVANCE THE RIGHTS OF THE DEAF: $20,000 · Crime & LegalHELPING EDUCATE TO AD…Off-The-Grid Missions: $20,000 · Crime & LegalOff-The-Grid MissionsDEAFINITELY INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentDEAFINITELY I…DEAF SPOTLIGHT: $20,000 · Arts & CultureDEAF SPOTL…
Education$70,000Human Services$55,000Crime & Legal$40,000Youth Development$25,000Arts & Culture$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetATOMIC HANDS: $45,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetDEAFINITELY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetThe Black Deaf Project: $25,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetDeaf Defy Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetDEAF SPOTLIGHT: $20,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetHELPING EDUCATE TO ADVANCE THE RIGHTS OF THE DEAF: $20,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetOff-The-Grid Missions: $20,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetDEAF EQUITY: $20,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetDEAF EMPOWERMENT AWARENESS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Borealis PhilanthropyMN13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Borealis Philanthropy · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Deaf Organizations Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Deaf Organizations Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 51%
  • Atomic Hands: 51% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Deaf Organizations Fund?

Find your warmest path to Deaf Organizations Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Deaf Organizations’ filings →

More from the funding graph