Skip to content
Dbid Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Dbid Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$606k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$3.7MHealth$1.7MInternational$1.0MReligion$471kArts & Culture$193kPhilanthropy$175kHuman Services$125kCivil Rights$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $10k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $464k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
$119,605
Median grant
1
States reached
$46M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING XI LLC (PROGRAMMING XI)$605,587
ITREK INC$400,000
ITREK INC$241,500
STEPHEN WISE FREE SYNAGOGUE$119,605
BERKSHIRE HILLS EISENBERG CAMP$103,111
STORAHTELLING LABSHUL INC$5,000
STORAHTELLING LABSHUL INC$5,000
LEGACY HERITAGE INVESTORS I LLC$81
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 80% of grant dollars ($6.0M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 20% that went abroad ($1.5M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHOLOM FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 11%RELIEF RESOURCES: $25k → 20%SHOLOM FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 11%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $25k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $25k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
MD
NC
GA

Beyond the US: 20% of all-years giving ($1.5M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Israel$1.5M · 7 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 15 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
19

Total granted

$4.2M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+19%

Still filing today

53%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $755k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DM
    DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $50k · revenue +50%
  • CC
    CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $50k · revenue +9%
  • MS
    MORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD
    2× · 2021–2022 · $50k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE STATE OF ISRAELMINISTRY OF HEALTHBARZILAI MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $700k
  • TS
    THE STATE OF ISRAELMINISTRY OF HEALTHBARZILAI MEDICAL
    one grant, 2021 · $562k
  • YV
    YAD VASHEM
    one grant, 2020 · $190k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
2
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
3
Atlanta Jewish Academy Inc

Atlanta jewish academy is a college preparatory, co-educational, preschool-12th grade, independent jewish day school, guided by modern orthodox values and principles. we embody the ideals of community, tradition, individual development and…

Education
4
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
5
Jewish Institute for the Blind (Jerusalem) Inc

To educate, enrich and empower visually impaired people across israel to achieve their full potential and become contributing members of society.

International
6
Jerusalem University College

Jerusalem University College creates opportunities for students to deepen their knowledge of God and His Word through immersive study of the ancient and modern contexts of Israel and the surrounding regions, equipping them for academia,…

International
7
The Jewish High School of Connecticut

The jewish high school of connecticut is dedicated to educate jewish youth for whom jewish values and traditions shape and guide their lives and for whom learning and responsible actions are foundational for achievement.

—
8
Torah Ore Seminary

To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.

Education
9
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
10
Sherit Isroel
—
11
Jewish Electorate Institute

The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…

Civil Rights
12
The Institute for Jewish Research and Publications Inc

None

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sinai Special Needs Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Emory University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING XI LLC (PROGRAMMING XI): $3,344,305 · OtherLEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING XI LLC (PROGRAMMING XI)THE STATE OF ISRAELMINISTRY OF HEALTHBARZILAI MEDICAL CENTER: $700,000 · OtherTHE STATE OF ISRAELMINISTRY OF HEALTHBARZILAI MEDICAL CENTERTHE STATE OF ISRAELMINISTRY OF HEALTHBARZILAI MEDICAL: $561,703 · OtherTHE STATE OF ISRAELMINISTRY OF HEALTHBARZILAI MEDICALYAD VASHEM: $190,000 · Other+14 more: $732,677 · Other+14 moreITREK INC: $641,500 · InternationalITREK INCPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $374,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAE…HEALTHCARE FOR ISRAEL INC: $160,000 · PhilanthropyHEALTHCAR…AMERICA GIVES INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICA G…MACHON BETH MEIR: $50,000 · PhilanthropyMACHON BE…GRATZ COLLEGE: $50,000 · EducationMORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD: $50,000 · EducationABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL: $48,000 · EducationPOLITZ DAY SCHOOL OF CHERRY HILL A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $37,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY: $36,000 · EducationEmory University: $32,000 · Education+1 more: $2,770 · EducationFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $87,250 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · HealthDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesSHOLOM FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Human ServicesRELIEF RESOURCES INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesNORTH AMERICAN CONFERENCE ON ETHIOPIAN JEWRY INC: $100,000 · ReligionSTORAHTELLING LAB SHUL INC: $10,000 · ReligionBEND THE ARC JEWISH ACTION INC: $25,000 · Public Benefit
Other$5,528,685International$641,500Philanthropy$634,000Education$256,270Health$137,250Human Services$125,000Religion$110,000Public Benefit$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetITREK INC: $641,500 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $374,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHCARE FOR ISRAEL INC: $160,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN CONFERENCE ON ETHIOPIAN JEWRY INC: $100,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $87,250 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetGRATZ COLLEGE: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetKIDS OF COURAGE INC: $50,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMACHON BETH MEIR: $50,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetMORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSHOLOM FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL: $48,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPOLITZ DAY SCHOOL OF CHERRY HILL A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $37,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY: $36,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $32,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH VOCATIONAL & CAREER COUNSELING SERVICE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBEND THE ARC JEWISH ACTION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRELIEF RESOURCES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSINAI SPECIAL NEEDS INSTITUTE INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTORAHTELLING LAB SHUL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR JEWISH STUDIES INC: $2,770 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundFjcAhba IncThe Goldman Sachs Cha…Jlrj IncJewish Federation of …The Shimon Ben Joseph…Cross River Community…Jewish Federation of …National Philanthropi…Jewish Community Foun…Jewish Community Fede…
Jewish Communal FundNY23.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · Ahba Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jlrj Inc · Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Cross River Community Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia · National Philanthropic Trust · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dbid Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dbid Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Trustees of Clark University: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dbid Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dbid Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dbid’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home