Skip to content

· Private foundation

Davis Kalogridis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$102k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$234kReligion$229kInternational$161kEducation$122kArts & Culture$50kYouth Development$46kHuman Services$43kPublic Safety & Disaster$29kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $52k
$3,325
Median grant
1
States reached
$669k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMP DE LA ARQUI SAN JOSE$20,000
HOUSTON METHODIST RESEARCH FOUNDATI$16,147
ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$15,500
Individual grant recipient$8,886
CO-CATHEDRAL OF THE SACRED HEART$7,900
MARSHALL CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$7,500
TRIUMPH OVER KID CANCER FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,325
CITY OF CC WATER$2,895
STREET CAT RESCUE$2,500
FLOUR BLUFF HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
DEL MAR COLLEGE$1,000
PREGNANCY CTR OF THE COASTAL BEND$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 83% of grant dollars ($813k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 17% that went abroad ($161k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HEROS ON THE WATER: $22k → 5%COVENANT HOUSE: $200 → 16%MEALS ON WHEELS: $258 → 10%MEALS ON WHEELS: $206 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
NY
CA
UT
AZ
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 17% of all-years giving ($161k)

4 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Mexico$143k · 5 grants
Brazil$17k · 4 grants
Costa Rica$1k · 1 grant
Uganda$282 · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Davis Kalogridis Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Davis Kalogridis Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 21% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$621k · 25 repeat orgs$455k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
80

Total granted

$621k
$389k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+9%

Still filing today

32%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesInternationalReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $14k · revenue +99%
  • SC
    STREET CAT RESCUE
    4× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +31%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    3× · 2019–2021 · $2k · revenue +126%

Funded once

  • CI
    COLLABORATION IN RESTORATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · 34% of their budget
  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $48k
  • BI
    BRITE INITIATIVE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $45k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pawsitively Cats Inc

Pawsitively cats is a no-kill cat shelter in tucson for homeless cats that provides compassionate care until a loving permanent home can be found. pawsitively cats also promotes trap, neuter and release (tnr) for feral cats. pawsitively…

Animals
2
Animal Defense League of Texas

The animal defense league of texas rescues homeless dogs, cats, puppies, and kittens, and provides medical treatment, nutrition, and shelter in a safe, live-release facility until they are matched with their forever families. through…

Animals
3
The Humane Society of Austin & Travis County Inc

The austin humane society (ahs) offers comprehensive, humane, life-saving animal services, transforming the lives of animals and those who love them. because we believe homeless animals deserve a chance to thrive in a loving environment,…

Animals
4
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
5
Community Animal Treatment Center

Community Animal Treatment Center (CATC) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization committed to delivering high-quality, high-volume spay and neuter (HQHVSN) services for community cats and pets, with a focus on supporting low-income…

Animals
6
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
7
Paws Crossed Animal Rescue Inc

To aid in animal rescue and provide medical care, nourishment, and a safe haven for abandoned, abused, and disabled animals. to engage in education, advocacy and collaboration in its mission "to rescue one by one until there are none".

Animals
8
Pasado's Safe Haven

Fighting to end animal cruelty and create a more compassionate world.(continued in schedule o)fiscal year 2024-2025 highlights include:investigated/resourced 71 animal cruelty cases, provided care andrehabilitations for 398 animals at our…

Animals
9
Fix Our Ferals

Fix our ferals (dba animal fix clinic) provides affordable, excellent quality spay/neuter and other life-saving and life-changing surgeries for companion dogs, cats and community cats.

Animals
10
Spca of Texas

The spca of texas is dedicated to providing every animal exceptional care and a loving home.

Animals
11
Saving Southern Kitties

Saving southern kitties mission is to save cats and kittens from high kill animal controls, house them in team foster homes, provide quality veterinary care and adopt them into forever homes.

Environment
12
Safe Haven for Cats

The mission of safe haven for cats is to use no-kill principles and education to save cats' lives through rescue, adoption, spay/neuter services and community programs.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 116 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
19/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $169,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHEOTOKOS FOUNDATION: $114,908 · OtherTHEOTOKOS FOUNDATIONST ANDREW BY THE SEA: $62,800 · OtherST ANDREW BY THE SEAFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $48,426 · OtherBRITE INITIATIVE INC: $45,140 · OtherCO-CATHEDRAL OF THE SACRED HEART: $34,600 · OtherST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $32,250 · Other+91 more: $432,989 · Other+91 moreCOLLABORATION IN RESTORATION INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $13,780 · HealthTRIUMPH OVER KID CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $2,230 · HealthCORPUS CHRISTI PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $2,000 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthHEROES ON THE WATER INC: $22,000 · Human Services+2 more: $664 · Human ServicesMAJESTY OUTDOORS: $15,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $100 · Youth DevelopmentSTREET CAT RESCUE: $6,746 · AnimalsSHADOW CATS RESCUE: $1,625 · AnimalsPEEWEE'S PET ADOPTION WORLD & SANCTUARY INC: $1,200 · AnimalsEMANCIPET INC: $400 · Animals+2 more: $500 · AnimalsTHE CHARRO FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$940,113Arts & Culture$50,000Health$28,110Human Services$22,664Youth Development$15,100Animals$10,471Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLLABORATION IN RESTORATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetHEROES ON THE WATER INC: $22,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMAJESTY OUTDOORS: $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $13,780 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHARRO FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTRIUMPH OVER KID CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTREET CAT RESCUE: $6,746 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetSKELETON CREW ADVENTURES: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION POST #364: $3,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetVISIONS MADE VIABLE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $2,230 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHADOW CATS RESCUE: $1,625 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPEEWEE'S PET ADOPTION WORLD & SANCTUARY INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN EXPLORE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAOMI'S VILLAGE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES C: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $464 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEMANCIPET INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATTERY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $196 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - CAPITOL AREA COUNCIL - TOM WOOTEN TRUST: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLLABORATION IN RESTORATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEROES ON THE WATER INC ↗
  • Who funds MAJESTY OUTDOORS ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHARRO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRIUMPH OVER KID CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STREET CAT RESCUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ed Rachal FoundationTX19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ed Rachal Foundation · Coastal Bend Community Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Behmann Brothers Foundation · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Earl C Sams Foundation Inc · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800 · Austin Community Foundation Inc · United Way Worldwide · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Davis Kalogridis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Davis Kalogridis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 116 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Davis Kalogridis’ filings →

More from the funding graph