· Private foundation
Davignon Charitable Fund
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Chuck Waggin Pet Food Pantry | $5,000 |
| Colorado Therapeutic Riding | $4,000 |
| Ability360 | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
| Ryan House | $3,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- RHRYAN HOUSE7× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +2%
- CTCOLORADO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER7× · 2017–2024 · $26k · revenue +3%
- AIABILITY360 INC7× · 2017–2024 · $25k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- BOBreckenridge Outdoor Education Centergraduatedone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +133%
- LOLost Our Home Pet Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +62%
- WKWestern Kentucky Relief Funone grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Empowering individuals with diverse abilities to reach their full potential through equine-assisted services since 1974.
To enable coloradoans with disabilities to lead more independent and gratifying lives by partnering them with highly skilled assistance (service) dogs.
Provide adaptive sports for the disabled.
Freedom Revived is here to bring a proactive approach to serving those who serve us. We provide support and encouragement through a variety of services that revitalize mind, body, and spirit to our Frontline.
Acres of Hope is a 501c3 nonprofit operating a 37-acre therapeutic ranch in Longmont CO. Our mission is to empower individuals to find healing and restoration through the therapeutic power of horses and nature. We provide a safe nurturing…
Our Mission: To improve the lives of humans through the immeasurable power of horses. Our Vision: To achieve excellence in the delivery of equine-assisted services. Our Values: 1. Compassion, 2. Connection, 3. Trust. We are an adaptive…
Creating access to resources by connecting opportunities for people of all disabilities, their families and communities, from Aspen to Parachute.
The national ability center (the center) empowers individuals with disabilities by building self-esteem, confidence and lifetime skills through sport, recreation and educational programs.
Our mission is to further the compassionate safe and responsible relationship between animals and people.
Our mission is to enhance the lives of individuals living with physical, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral challenges by providing innovative, accessible and safe equine-assisted therapeutic programs of the highest quality. we are…
Special Equestrians provides therapeutic riding programs to individuals with physical, mental, and emotional disabilities.
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Davignon Charitable Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Davignon Charitable Fund. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Davignon Charitable Fund?
Find your warmest path to Davignon Charitable Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Davignon’s filings →