Skip to content
Davidson-Rogovein Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Davidson-Rogovein Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$750
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$2kHealth$1kPhilanthropy$1kAnimals$750International$193Religion$102Education$55Employment$30
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
6
States reached
$47k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America$750
Jewish Family & Children Services$750
Paws with a Cause$250
Israel Guide Dog Center$250
American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee$193
Individual grant recipient$30
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Israel Guide Dog Center: $250 → 6%Paws with a Cause: $500 → 10%Paws with a Cause: $250 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
CA
AZ
KS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3k · 6 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$3k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+13%

Still filing today

50%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $473 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationAnimalsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MG
    Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Inc
    3× · 2022–2025 · $1k · revenue +72%
  • PW
    Paws With A Cause
    2× · 2024–2025 · $750 · revenue +4%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $72 · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • AG
    AMERICA GIVES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -25%
  • JO
    JCFS of Southern Arizona
    one grant, 2024 · $544
  • WD
    WORKING DOGS FOR WARRIORS CORPgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue +564%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
2
Jgive-Friends of Asor Fund Usa Inc

Our primary program, JGive, involves development and implementation of a new, advanced social donations platform, established with the aim of facilitating donations in a reliable, quick and safe way. Use of this innovative platform results…

Philanthropy
3
Jewish War Veterans of the United States

The Organization was granted a charter as a not for profit corporation for patriotic and educational purposes with special concern for the welfare of veterans. The Organization's principal activities consist of protecting the benefits and…

—
4
American Diabetes Association

The mission of the American Diabetes Association is to prevent and cure diabetes and to improve the lives of all people affected by diabetes.

Health
5
Jewish War Veterans of the Usa National Memorial Inc

The mission of the Jewish War Veterans of the USA National Memorial, Inc., doing business as the National Museum of American Jewish Military History, is to preserve, interpret, and share the history of Jewish Americans who have served in…

Arts & Culture
6
The American German Shepherd Dog Charitable Foundation

To help fund research studies aimed at reducing the incedence of medical conditions in the german shepherd dog and improveing the effectiveness of treatment of many types of medical conditions. we research and fund medical studies to look…

—
7
American Association of Kidney Patients Inc

AAKP is dedicated to improving the lives and long-term outcome of kidney patients. Cont on Sch O.

Health
8
Early Alert Canines

Training medical detection dogs to enhance health, safety and well-being of individuals with insulin-dependent diabetes. We also advance public health by training & deploying dogs to detect other diseases.

Animals
9
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
10
The Dons of Arizona
Education
11
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
12
Autoimmune Registry Inc

Autoimmune Registry, Inc. (ARI) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit umbrella organization that provides a hub for research, statistics, and patient data on all autoimmune diseases. ARI operates a database where patients who suffer from any…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Kidney Foundation of Arizona; the most unlike its peers is D M 50. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Jewish Family & Children Services: $786 · OtherJewish Family & Children Servi…JCFS of Southern Arizona: $544 · OtherJCFS of Southern ArizonaHadassah: $121 · OtherHadassah+5 more: $192 · Other+5 moreMyasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Inc: $1,318 · HealthMyasthenia Gravis Foundati…American Heart Association Inc: $72 · Health+1 more: $36 · HealthAMERICA GIVES INC: $1,250 · PhilanthropyAMERICA GIVES INCPaws With A Cause: $750 · Human ServicesPaws With A CauseISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $250 · Human ServicesISRAEL GUIDE DOG C…WORKING DOGS FOR WARRIORS CORP: $500 · AnimalsWORKING D…The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $193 · InternationalHYMAN BRAND HEBREW ACADEMY: $36 · Education
Other$1,643Health$1,426Philanthropy$1,250Human Services$1,000Animals$500International$193Education$36

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMyasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Inc: $1,318 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPaws With A Cause: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $72 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetD M 50: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHYMAN BRAND HEBREW ACADEMY: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation of Arizona: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Davidson-Rogovein Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Davidson-Rogovein Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Davidson-Rogovein’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home