Skip to content

· Private foundation

David S Ascher MD Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$662kHealth$376kHousing & Shelter$135kHuman Services$79kCrime & Legal$47kInternational$40kEnvironment$35kArts & Culture$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $73k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$50k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TUFTS UNIVERSITY$25,183
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$15,250
CASA$12,435
THE CRAIG SCHOOL$10,000
ORANGE COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART$10,000
AOCDS OC DEPUTY SHERIFFS$4,000
SALEM LUTHERAN SCHOOL$1,990
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WITH MY OWN TWO HANDS: $2k → 10%WITH MY OWN TWO HANDS: $1k → 10%KHERUT: $5k → 10%KHERUT: $262 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
MD
AZ
DC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 36 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against -84% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
15

Total granted

$1.3M
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
-84%

Still filing today

56%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEnvironmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Trustees of Tufts College
    8× · 2017–2025 · $295k · revenue +50%
  • TH
    THOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER
    6× · 2017–2024 · $205k · revenue +105%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE
    5× · 2017–2023 · $128k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE
    one grant, 2019 · $14k
  • CO
    CENTER OF AUTISM
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
7
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
8
Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago

Achieving international impact through world-class research and education in fundamental computer science and information technology.

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
11
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
12
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Love Tribe Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER: $205,000 · OtherTHOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTERCASA: $106,565 · OtherCASAREDLANDS UNIVERSITY: $65,000 · OtherREDLANDS UNIVERSITYAOCDS (OC Deputy Sheriffs): $36,000 · OtherAOCDS (OC Deputy Sheriffs)Individual grant recipient: $25,000 · Other+31 more: $227,307 · Other+31 moreTrustees of Tufts College: $295,025 · EducationTrustees of Tufts CollegeTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $127,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGETHE CRAIG SCHOOL: $103,130 · EducationTHE CRAIG SCHOOLAMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA CORPORATION: $30,000 · EducationPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $20,000 · Education+2 more: $17,000 · EducationBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $23,260 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $20,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $10,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 · HealthOCEANA INC: $35,378 · EnvironmentLOVE TRIBE PROJECT INC: $29,908 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyORANGE COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART: $15,000 · Arts & CultureWE CHARITY WILLIAM C MORAN & ASSOC PC: $10,000 · International
Other$664,872Education$592,655Health$57,260Environment$35,378Philanthropy$30,408Arts & Culture$15,000International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $295,025 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER: $205,000 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $127,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CRAIG SCHOOL: $103,130 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetOCEANA INC: $35,378 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA CORPORATION: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLOVE TRIBE PROJECT INC: $29,908 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $23,260 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetORANGE COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKHERUT: $5,454 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOLF FORE AFRICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWITH MY OWN TWO HANDS FOUNDATION: $3,083 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNEW VISTA SCHOOL: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBEYOND BLINDNESS: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE CRAIG SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LOVE TRIBE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WE CHARITY WILLIAM C MORAN & ASSOC PC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds KHERUT ↗
  • Who funds THE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GOLF FORE AFRICA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA21.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · Glen and Dorothy Stillwell Charitable Trust · O L Halsell Foundation · The Devto Support Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David S Ascher MD Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David S Ascher MD Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to David S Ascher MD Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to David S Ascher MD Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David S Ascher MD’s filings →

More from the funding graph