Skip to content

· Private foundation

David R & Karen Daniel Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$278kReligion$15kHealth$9kHuman Services$5kPhilanthropy$500Public Benefit$250Arts & Culture$200
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$917k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETT$50,000
HOSPICE OF ACADIANA$6,000
TUNNELS TO TOWERS$1,500
ST PIUS$1,100
FIRST METHODIST CHURCH$1,000
ASBURY METHODIST CHURCH$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOSPICE OF ACADIANA: $6k → 17%HOSPICE OF ACADIANA: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$298k · 7 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

$298k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
0%

Still filing today

43%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $275k · revenue +26%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF ACADIANA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $8k · revenue +5%
  • BM
    BRIDGE MINISTRY OF ACADIANA INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $330 · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • HH
    HEALING HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • TG
    TEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $504 · revenue 0%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF OHIO
    one grant, 2024 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Joseph J Laurencelle Memorial Foundation
Education
2
Our Amazing Grace's Light Shines On Inc
Human Services
3
Team American Freedom Corp

Team american freedom was founded to develop an engaging and committed network focused on the welfare of our veterans. we are an organization born from the legacy of former special forces operators. our team, bolstered by years of special…

Philanthropy
4
Levi Legacy

At levis legacy, our mission is clear to serve and support families facing the daunting reality of chds, along with the dedicated medical professionals who stand by their side. our mission is not just to weather the storm with them but to…

Youth Development
5
The Arsenault Family Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
6
Louisiana Alpha House Scholarship Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Alabama Healthcare Hall of Fame
Arts & Culture
8
Livelikelou Foundation

The live like lou foundation's mission is to create and connect communities to stimulate emerging als research and uniquely support families affected by lou gehrig's disease. named in honor of mlb hall of famer lou gehrig, our vision is to…

Education
9
Legacies Alive

Legacies alive's mission is to strengthen and support the gold star families of our nation's fallen heroes and bring national awareness to the life and character of all service members who paid the ultimate sacrifice. founded by combat…

Human Services
10
Trail of Honor
—
11
Lvh Als Foundation

The mission of the lvh foundation is to provide funding to endow a professorship of als at duke university - not only to help those today with als, but more importantly to fund a cure for als in the future.

Health
12
Lawrence & Lillian Solomon Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of Acadiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $274,910 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE ALUMNI ASSOCIATIONASBURY METHODIST CHURCH: $10,824 · Other+9 more: $5,675 · OtherHOSPICE OF ACADIANA INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesTEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION: $504 · Human ServicesHEALING HOUSE INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,500 · EducationBRIDGE MINISTRY OF ACADIANA INC: $330 · Youth DevelopmentLed By Grace Inc: $250 · Public BenefitTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $200 · Arts & CultureTHE GRAEME MCDANIEL FOUNDATION: $100 · Health
Other$291,409Human Services$8,504Community Improvement$5,000Education$1,500Youth Development$330Public Benefit$250Arts & Culture$200Health$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $274,910 over 7y, 14% of budgetHOSPICE OF ACADIANA INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALING HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION: $504 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE MINISTRY OF ACADIANA INC: $330 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLed By Grace Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GRAEME MCDANIEL FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF ACADIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALING HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE MINISTRY OF ACADIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds Led By Grace Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GRAEME MCDANIEL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of AcadianaLA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Acadiana · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David R & Karen Daniel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David R & Karen Daniel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on David R & Karen Daniel Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph