Skip to content

· Private foundation

David Joyce Charitable Trust David Wong Et Al Trustees

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$51kHealth$44kEducation$7kArts & Culture$6kCommunity Improvement$1kInternational$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$62k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$2,000
TAISHAN COMMUNITY ASSN INC$1,000
NEW ENGLAND BAPTIST HOSPITAL$500
TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER$300
MASONIC EDUCATION & CHARITY TR$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%YMCA OF GREATER BOSTON: $5k → 16%ASIAN AMERICA CIVIC ASSN: $13k → 16%ASIAN AMERICA CIVIC ASSN: $10k → 16%ASIAN AMERICA CIVIC ASSN: $10k → 16%ASIAN AMERICAN CIVIC ASSN: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$87k · 9 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$87k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+12%

Still filing today

33%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ASIAN AMERICAN CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $38k · revenue +66%
  • TM
    TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER
    6× · 2018–2024 · $28k
  • TC
    TAISHAN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $7k

Funded once

  • JD
    JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -12%
  • KK
    KWONG KOW CHINESE SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +12%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
2
Winchester Hospital

The mission of winchester hospital is "to care. to heal. to excel." this ethos provides each and every staff member with clear expectations, promoting teamwork and respect while ensuring safety, quality and empathy for patients. winchester…

Health
3
Joslin Clinic Inc

To provide the highest quality specialty medical care to patients with diabetes and diabetes related conditions and to search for a cure.

Health
4
Northeast Hospital Corporation

Centering on a concept and continuum of care that embraces the health, well-being and dignity of each patient, regardless of their ability to pay, northeast hospital corporation (nhc) has four facilities, beverly hospital, addison gilbert…

Health
5
Mass General Brigham Incorporated

Patient care, teaching, research and serving the community.

Health
6
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital - Milton

The mission of the beth israel deaconess hospital-milton, inc. (bid-milton or hospital) is to provide safe, high-quality, community-based health care and access to tertiary care in close collaboration with its sister hospital, beth israel…

Health
7
Beth Israel Lahey Health Primary Care

Beth israel lahey health primary care (bilhpc) is a network of community based physicians affiliated with the beth israel lahey health (bilh) network and serving the patients and communities served by the lahey clinic hospital (lahey…

—
8
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth Inc

The mission of the beth israel deaconess hospital-plymouth, inc. (bid-plymouth or hospital) is to improve the health and well-being of its patients and communities by providing a full continuum of healthcare services with excellence and…

Health
9
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc

Tertiary care academic medical center

Health
10
Anna Jaques Hospital Inc

The mission of anna jaques hospital (ajh or hospital) is to provide the highest quality medical care and improve the health of the communities served by ajh in alliance with the ajh medical staff and ajh affiliates including seacoast…

Health
11
Lahey Clinic Foundation Inc

The lahey clinic foundation, inc. (lcf) serves as the sole member and supports the lahey clinic (lc) and lahey clinic hospital d/b/a lahey hospital & medical center (lhmc), enabling lhmc and lc to provide superior health care leading to…

Health
12
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New England Baptist Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER: $28,000 · OtherTUFTS MEDICAL CENTERTAISHAN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC: $6,950 · OtherTAISHAN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INCKWONG KOW CHINESE SCHOOL INC: $6,700 · OtherKWONG KOW CHINESE SCHOOL INCQUE SHING CHINESE MUSIC &: $6,000 · OtherQUE SHING CHINESE MUSIC &MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $3,175 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL+6 more: $1,550 · OtherASIAN AMERICAN CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC: $38,398 · Human ServicesASIAN AMERICAN CIVIC ASSOCIATION INCYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER…+1 more: $50 · Human ServicesJOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC: $10,000 · HealthJOSLIN DIABET…NEW ENGLAND BAPTIST HOSPITAL: $2,500 · HealthNEW ENGLAND B…+1 more: $150 · HealthMASONIC EDUCATION & CHARITY TRUST: $1,142 · Community Improvement
Other$52,375Human Services$43,448Health$12,650Community Improvement$1,142

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASIAN AMERICAN CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC: $38,398 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKWONG KOW CHINESE SCHOOL INC: $6,700 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND BAPTIST HOSPITAL: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMASONIC EDUCATION & CHARITY TRUST: $1,142 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KWONG KOW CHINESE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND BAPTIST HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds MASONIC EDUCATION & CHARITY TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds AARP FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David Joyce Charitable Trust David Wong Et Al Trustees funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David Joyce Charitable Trust David Wong Et Al Trustees. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Joslin Diabetes Center Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Asian American Civic Association Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Masonic Education & Charity Trust: 2% of income from government
  • New England Baptist Hospital: 1% of income from government
  • Kwong Kow Chinese School Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David Joyce Charitable Trust David Wong Et Al Trustees’ filings →

More from the funding graph