Skip to content

Massachusetts · Private foundation

David Joyce Charitable Trust David Wong Et Al Trustees

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
5
Grants FY2024
5
Organizations funded FY2023
20%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$500
Largest grant, FY2024
$2,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 8
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$62k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 20% of the organizations David Joyce Charitable Trust David Wong Et Al Trustees funded were first-time grantees, receiving 24% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving5$4k0%
FY20235$28k20%
FY20224$16k25%
FY20216$16k17%
FY20208$8k13%
FY20196$7k50%
FY20188$12k88%
FY20174$19kn/a
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$51kHealth$44kEducation$7kArts & Culture$6kCommunity Improvement$1kInternational$500Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Asian American Civic Association Inc$38,39840%
Joslin Diabetes Center Inc$10,00010%
Taishan Community Association Inc$6,9507n/a
Kwong Kow Chinese School Inc$6,70010%
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Boston Inc$5,00010%
New England Baptist Hospital$2,50030%
Masonic Education & Charity Trust$1,14250%
Mass General Brigham Incorporated$3503n/a
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc$15010%
AARP Foundation$5010%

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($38k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget David Joyce Charitable Trust David Wong Et Al Trustees supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAsian American Civic Association Inc: $38,398 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJoslin Diabetes Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKwong Kow Chinese School Inc: $6,700 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Greater Boston Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew England Baptist Hospital: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMasonic Education & Charity Trust: $1,142 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP Foundation: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare David Joyce Charitable Trust David Wong Et Al Trustees with peer funders

About David Joyce Charitable Trust David Wong Et Al Trustees

How much does David Joyce Charitable Trust David Wong Et Al Trustees give?
David Joyce Charitable Trust David Wong Et Al Trustees reported 5 grants totaling $3,900 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 8 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does David Joyce Charitable Trust David Wong Et Al Trustees fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Human Services (46%), Health (41%), Education (6%).
Who are David Joyce Charitable Trust David Wong Et Al Trustees's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Asian American Civic Association Inc ($38k), Joslin Diabetes Center Inc ($10k), Taishan Community Association Inc ($7k).
Does David Joyce Charitable Trust David Wong Et Al Trustees fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does David Joyce Charitable Trust David Wong Et Al Trustees accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as David Joyce Charitable Trust David Wong Et Al Trustees?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Boston Foundation Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is David Joyce Charitable Trust David Wong Et Al Trustees based?
David Joyce Charitable Trust David Wong Et Al Trustees is based in MA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David Joyce Charitable Trust David Wong Et Al Trustees’ filings →

More from the funding graph