Skip to content
David Herzog Foundation Herman Herzog Tte at a glance

· Private foundation

David Herzog Foundation Herman Herzog Tte

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$655k
Granted FY2022
17
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02Its granteesRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$3.0MReligion$1.1MHealth$82kEducation$21kPhilanthropy$20kFood & Nutrition$3kArts & Culture$3kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2022 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $575,560, the rows itemized in this filing. The $654,610 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $79,050 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k14 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$1,800
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mosdos Bais Yosef Zvi$500,000
Cong. Ahavas Tzedakah V'chesed$27,800
B.J.J.$10,000
Mifal Ezra Zichron Yehuda$8,600
Cong. Chemed B.P.$7,380
Menucha Learning Center$7,000
Chayim Vchesed Inc.$2,800
Reb Mayer Bal Hanes$2,340
American Friends of Tomchai Shabat$1,800
WIZO$1,800
Cong. Bais Osher Mordechai$1,500
Friends of Zichron Meir$1,200
Kollel Bais Yona D'Nitra$1,080
Kolel Shema Institute$1,000
Kapayim$540
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$268k · 22 repeat orgs$923k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +91% since the first grant, against -85% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2022, 18 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
26

Total granted

$268k
$366k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
-85%

Still filing today

18%
4%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $557k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’22
ReligionPhilanthropyHealthInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ZICHRON MEIR INC FRIENDS OF ZICHRON MEIR
    3× · 2018–2022 · $7k · revenue +91%
  • MO
    MESIFTA OF GREATER MIAMI-LOUIS
    2× · 2018–2019 · $7k · revenue +9%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA
    2× · 2018–2019 · $5k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • MB
    MOSDOS BETH YOSEPH ZVI
    one grant, 2018 · $280k
  • TT
    TALMUD TORAH DARKEI AVOS - MONSEY
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BETH JACOB TEACHERS INSTITUTE OF JERUSALEM
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -85%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
2
American Friends of Tzir Hemed
Philanthropy
3
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
4
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
5
American Friends Tomchai Shabat Foundation
—
6
Chasudim Foundation
—
7
American Friends of Hamesorah Talmud Torah Inc

Charity and education in u.s. and israel

—
8
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
—
9
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
11
Zichron Chaim Meir Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Sfath Emeth Yeshiva; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Beth Jacob Teachers Institute of Jerusalem. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Mosdos Bais Yosef Zvi: $500,000 · OtherMosdos Bais Yosef ZviMOSDOS BETH YOSEPH ZVI: $280,000 · OtherMOSDOS BETH YOSEPH ZVIMIFAL EZRA ZICHRON YEHUDA: $85,200 · OtherMIFAL EZRA ZICHRON YEHUDACONG CHEMED B.P.: $81,180 · OtherCONG CHEMED B.P.+50 more: $200,100 · Other+50 moreTHE OJC FUND: $20,000 · EducationMESIFTA OF GREATER MIAMI-LOUIS: $6,500 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BETH JACOB TEACHERS INSTITUTE OF JERUSALEM: $20,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ZICHRON MEIR INC FRIENDS OF ZICHRON MEIR: $6,800 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA: $5,400 · PhilanthropyCHAYIM V CHESED: $2,800 · ReligionARACHIM INC: $2,800 · ReligionKAPAYIM INC: $540 · Health
Other$1,146,480Education$26,500International$20,000Philanthropy$12,200Religion$5,600Health$540

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE OJC FUND: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ZICHRON MEIR INC FRIENDS OF ZICHRON MEIR: $6,800 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMESIFTA OF GREATER MIAMI-LOUIS: $6,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHAYIM V CHESED: $2,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAPAYIM INC: $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BETH JACOB TEACHERS INSTITUTE OF JERUSALEM ↗
  • Who funds THE OJC FUND ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ZICHRON MEIR INC FRIENDS OF ZICHRON MEIR ↗
  • Who funds MESIFTA OF GREATER MIAMI-LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA ↗
  • Who funds CHAYIM V CHESED ↗
  • Who funds ARACHIM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…Jewish Communal FundNational Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Ojc FundNY19.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to David Herzog Foundation Herman Herzog Tte?

Find your warmest path to David Herzog Foundation Herman Herzog Tte through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $400k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David Herzog Foundation Herman Herzog Tte’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home