Skip to content

· Private foundation

David Greenberg Trust

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2026still arriving
10
Grants FY2026still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$67kHuman Services$36kReligion$30kRecreation & Sports$27kEducation$6kYouth Development$2kArts & Culture$1k
02FY2026 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k8 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$7,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$931k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Autism Services of Southwest Louisiana$15,000
Shriners Hospital for Children - Shreveport$14,500
Christus Ochsner SWLA Foundation$9,000
Beloved and Beyond$7,500
St Jude Children's Research Hospital$7,500
Care Help of Sulphur Inc$6,500
Local Heart Foundation$6,000
Agape School of Baton Rouge$5,000
Grace Baptist Church$4,000
Westlake High School$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Autism Services of Southwest Louisiana: $15k → 17%Autism Services of Southwest Louisiana: $12k → 17%Autism Services of SWLA: $4k → 17%AUTISM SERVICES OF SWLA: $4k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$203k · 11 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
7

Total granted

$203k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+80%

Still filing today

55%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    AUTISM SERVICES OF SWLA
    4× · 2021–2026 · $35k · revenue -18%
  • BA
    Beloved and Beyond
    4× · 2022–2026 · $32k · revenue +15%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2022–2026 · $31k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • CS
    CHRISTUS ST PAT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • SJ
    ST JUDE
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • RB
    Rescue Baptist Church
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christus Foundation Shreveport-Bossier

The primary purpose of christus foundation shreveport-bossier is to promote philanthropy and charitable giving to provide resources to enhance the ability of christus health northern louisiana in its mission of extending the healing…

—
2
Christus Health Foundation of Southeast Texas

Christus health foundation of southeast texas serves the philanthropic needs of christus health southeast texas by soliciting and distributing contributions in support of christus health southeast texas.

—
3
Christus St Michael Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for the charitable, scientific, and educational purposes of advancing, promoting, and supporting the health care ministries of those religious congregations (the "sponsoring…

—
4
Christus Continuing Care

The corporation's mission shall be to extend the healing ministry of jesus christ, and consistent therewith, shall operate according to the doctrines, resolutions, decrees and ethical principles of christus health, and the ethical and…

—
5
Dubourg Home Dba Place Dubourg Apartments

Provides housing for elderly and disabled persons and families under section 207/223(f) of the national housing act under an agreement with the department of hud.

—
6
St Charles Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
7
Luke's House- a Clinic for Healing and Hope

Luke's house provides medical and spiritual hope, health, and healing to greater new orleans residents, creates patient-centered experiences for students, and connects patients to long-term healthcare solutions.

Health
8
St Charles Hospital Corp

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
9
St Joseph Services Corporation

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

Health
10
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
11
Christus Foundation for HealthCare

CHRISTUS Foundation for HealthCare is dedicated to extending the healing ministry of Jesus Christ, continuing the legacy of the Congregation of the Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word through the promotion of health and welfare to…

Health
12
Louisiana Baptist Childrens Home and Family Ministries

To provide love, care, and a positive christian witness for children and families in need.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christus St Patrick Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Local Heart Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CARE HELP OF SULPHUR INC: $22,000 · OtherCARE HELP OF SULPHUR INCShriners Hospital: $20,000 · OtherShriners HospitalCHRISTUS ST PATRICK FOUNDATION: $19,000 · OtherCHRISTUS ST PATRICK FOUNDATIONChristus Ochsner SWLA Foundation: $17,000 · OtherChristus Ochsner SWLA FoundationShriners Hospital for Children - Shreveport: $14,500 · OtherShriners Hospital for Children - ShreveportGRACE BAPTIST CHURCH: $7,000 · OtherGRACE BAPTIST CHURCHCovenant Grace Academy: $5,500 · OtherCHRISTUS ST PAT FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Other+7 more: $20,700 · Other+7 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $30,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S …LOCAL HEART FOUNDATION: $11,000 · HealthLOCAL HEART FOUNDAT…AUTISM SERVICES OF SWLA: $35,000 · Human ServicesAUTISM SERVICES …Beloved and Beyond: $31,500 · Recreation & SportsBeloved and Be…AGAPE SCHOOL OF BATON ROUGE INC: $5,000 · EducationBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $2,000 · Youth Development
Other$130,700Health$41,500Human Services$35,000Recreation & Sports$31,500Education$5,000Youth Development$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUTISM SERVICES OF SWLA: $35,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetBeloved and Beyond: $31,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $30,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCARE HELP OF SULPHUR INC: $22,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTUS ST PATRICK FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLOCAL HEART FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUTISM SERVICES OF SWLA ↗
  • Who funds Beloved and Beyond ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CARE HELP OF SULPHUR INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTUS ST PATRICK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOCAL HEART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE SCHOOL OF BATON ROUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David Greenberg Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David Greenberg Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on David Greenberg’s filings →

    More from the funding graph