Skip to content

· Private foundation

David F and Jody M Nielson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$78k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$210kEducation$200kHealth$66kInternational$25kReligion$16kPhilanthropy$11kHousing & Shelter$10kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Heritage School$35,000
American Indian Services$20,000
Orrock Mendenall Sport Med Fdt$10,000
Costco Charity$5,000
The Church of Jesus Christ of LDS$4,800
Stand 4 Kind$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $177k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Homefront America: $1k → 10%American Indian Services: $20k → 8%American Indian Services: $48k → 8%American Indian Services: $30k → 8%American Indian Services: $3k → 8%American Indian Services: $30k → 8%American Indian Services: $29k → 8%American Indian Services: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$444k · 7 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
17

Total granted

$444k
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+17%

Still filing today

29%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heritage Schools Inc
    5× · 2018–2024 · $192k · revenue -4%
  • AI
    American Indian Services
    7× · 2017–2024 · $176k · revenue +6%
  • PC
    Primary Childrens Hospital
    4× · 2019–2022 · $28k

Funded once

  • 9S
    971 Secret Santa Fund
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • RC
    Relina Clinger Farm Sup Trust
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • SL
    Service Legacy Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Congenital Hyperinsulinism International

Congenital Hyperinsulinism International (CHI) is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation dedicated to improving the lives of babies, children, and adults affected by congenital hyperinsulinism (HI). HI is a life-threatening genetic disorder…

Health
3
Preventive Medicine Research Institute

Preventive Medicine Research Institute is a pioneer in scientific research investigating the effects of diet and lifestyle choices on health and disease. Our work is grounded in compassion and dedication to service. PMRI achieves its…

Health
4
Stanley Manne Childrens Research Institute

Stanley manne children's research institute strives to generate new knowledge and advance the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric diseases.

Health
5
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
6
Academy Research and Development Institute

ARDI stewards donated endowments to sustain future American air and space power, enhancing faculty quality and cadet education at the United States Air Force Academy.

—
7
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
8
Medical Mission International - Usa

To relieve and alleviate human suffering, misery, poverty, sickness, and distress throughout the world by providing emergency medical relief, funding, and support.

Religion
9
Hudson Institute Inc

Hudson Institute is a research organization promoting American leadership for a secure, free, and prosperous future.

—
10
American Heart Association Inc

The american heart association's mission is to be a relentless force for a world of longer, healthier lives.

Health
11
American Sudden Death Syndrome Institute Inc

The American SIDS Institute, is dedicated to the prevention of sudden infant death and the promotion of infant health through research, family support, and professional education.

Health
12
Iit Research Institute

Perform basic research and preclinical efficacy assessments of new molecular entities being developed for the prevention and treatment of cancer and infectious disease. Discover new pathways and targets for the design and development of…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is STAND4KIND; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American Heritage Schools Inc: $192,080 · EducationAmerican Heritage Schools IncOrrock Mendenhall Sports Medicine Founda: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $3,000 · EducationAmerican Indian Services: $175,580 · Human ServicesAmerican Indian Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesPrimary Childrens Hospital: $27,500 · OtherPrimary Childrens Hospital971 Secret Santa Fund: $15,000 · Other971 Secret Santa FundChurch of Jesus Christ of LDS: $14,400 · OtherChurch of Jesus Christ of LDSPRIMARY CHILDREN'S CANCER: $13,040 · OtherPRIMARY CHILDREN'S CANCERRelina Clinger Farm Sup Trust: $11,855 · OtherRelina Clinger Farm Sup TrustChurch of Jesus Christ: $10,900 · OtherChurch of Jesus ChristLDS Philanthropies: $10,649 · OtherLDS PhilanthropiesService Legacy Foundation: $10,000 · OtherService Legacy FoundationIndividual grant recipient: $6,100 · OtherMuscular Dystrophy Association: $5,360 · Other+8 more: $26,266 · Other+8 moreDANNY DID FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $2,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $250 · HealthHumanitarian Experience Inc: $200 · International
Education$205,080Human Services$176,580Other$151,070Health$7,250International$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Heritage Schools Inc: $192,080 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Indian Services: $175,580 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetOrrock Mendenhall Sports Medicine Founda: $10,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetDANNY DID FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEFRONT AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Heritage Schools Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Indian Services ↗
  • Who funds Orrock Mendenhall Sports Medicine Founda ↗
  • Who funds DANNY DID FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STAND4KIND ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEFRONT AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds Humanitarian Experience Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Beesley Family FoundationUT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Beesley Family Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David F and Jody M Nielson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David F and Jody M Nielson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on David F and Jody M Nielson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph