How much did DAVID DINNOCENTI MEMORIAL FOUNDATION grant in FY2023?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 85% of DAVID DINNOCENTI MEMORIAL FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

catholic appeal

2020

beachcatholic appeal

2021

catholicbeach

2022

—

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$200

Median grant

States reached

$193k

Total assets

Largest grants

BIRTHRIGHT OF POTTSTOWN$1,500
ST ALOYSIUS CHURCH$1,000
EWTN$1,000
ST CHARLES BURROMEO SEMINARY$500
UNBOUNDED$420
KIDS WISH NETWORK$300
NATIONAL CENTER FOR PADRE PIO$300
FOOD FOR THE POOR$300
CHOP FOUNDATION$300
COVENANT HOUSE$300
PRIESTS FOR LIFE$300
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$300
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF$300
POPULATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE$300
PARENTS TELEVISION COUNCIL$300

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 8%. 60% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$75k · 60 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

60 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2023, 22 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$75k

$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%

+21%

Still filing today

23%

13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $800 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Civil RightsHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentSocial ScienceReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BO
BIRTHRIGHT OF POTTSTOWN
6× · 2018–2023 · $8k · revenue +24%
PC
POTTSTOWN CLUSTER OF RELIGIOUS
6× · 2018–2023 · $2k · revenue +85%
HL
HUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL
6× · 2018–2023 · $1k · revenue +10%

Funded once

SP
ST PAUL OF THE CROSS CHURCH
one grant, 2018 · $300
F9
FLIGHT 93 NATIONAL MEMORIAL FD
one grant, 2018 · $200
BO
BASILICA OF NATIONAL SHRINE
one grant, 2022 · $200

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Americans United for Life Inc

AUL is an organization that advances the human right to life in culture, law, and policy.

Civil Rights

Project Defending Life Inc

We are committed to defending the sacredness of human life from conception to natural death, focused specifically on ending abortion.

Civil Rights

Life International

To uphold the value of all human life worldwide.

Health

Indiana Right to Life Incorporated

To educate the public about abortion

—

Pro-Life Union of Greater Philadelphia

The pro-life union of greater philadelphia affirms the sanctity of life through leadership, service to those making the choice for life, and witness to a culture of love. we accomplish this through our support of guiding star ministries…

Human Services

Planned Parenthood Global Inc

To support the provision and protection of sexual and reproductive health services (see sch o)and rights across the globe.

Health

Life Training Institute

Life Training Institute's (LTI) purpose is to teach and train students and adults to save lives by persuasively communicating the pro-life position. LTI accomplishes this by deploying a team of speakers, all highly trained, to go and…

—

Women's Law Project

The women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of the…

Civil Rights

40 Days for Life

40 Days for Life focuses on education, equipping, and training local communities to pray and fast, do community outreach, and hold peaceful vigils to offer loving alternatives to women who are pregnant.

Education

Guttmacher Institute Inc

The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.

—

Priests for Life

The mission of Priests for Life is to activate and equip Gods people to end abortion by increasing their awareness of the problem their understanding of how their faith impels them to address it and their access to the tools they need to…

Youth Development

Human Life Alliance

Human life alliance (hla) distributes powerful pro-life information across the united states and around the globe on topics of abortion, teen sexual risk avoidance, euthanasia, assisted suicide, and the dignity of all human life. since…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/21

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,544

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/21

Grantees still filing

14/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$67,430International$2,600Health$2,400Civil Rights$2,150Social Science$1,200Religion$1,100Youth Development$940

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rafael Madan & Lilian Casas FoundationVA13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rafael Madan & Lilian Casas Foundation · Ge Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation DAVID DINNOCENTI MEMORIAL FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BIRTHRIGHT OF POTTSTOWN.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 232155774 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BIRTHRIGHT OF POTTSTOWN, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to David Dinnocenti Memorial Foundation?

Find your warmest path to David Dinnocenti Memorial Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

DAVID DINNOCENTI MEMORIAL FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to David Dinnocenti Memorial Foundation?

More from the funding graph

DAVID DINNOCENTI MEMORIAL FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to David Dinnocenti Memorial Foundation?

More from the funding graph