Skip to content

· Private foundation

David B Costa Private Foundation Uad 030222

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$650k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Health$300kAnimals$250kFood & Nutrition$250kInternational$250kYouth Development$125kPhilanthropy$115kHuman Services$20kEnvironment$10k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $615k
$55,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF THE BAY$125,000
RICHMOND AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC$55,000
MEALS ON WHEELS SAN FRANCISCO$55,000
RICHMOND DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD CTR$55,000
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK$55,000
MERCY BEYOND BORDERS$55,000
THE HUMANE SOCIETY$55,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF SV$55,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AM$55,000
AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND$50,000
MAUI UNITED WAY$25,000
SWANER PRESERVE AND ECOCENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 9 repeat orgs$205k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$1.1M
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+9%

Still filing today

89%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $185k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
HealthAnimalsInternationalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RD
    RICHMOND DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $125k · revenue +19%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $125k · revenue +4%
  • WC
    WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $125k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • CO
    Children of the Night
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
Homeless Childrens Network

To provide direct mental health services, psychotherapy, and counseling to homeless families in San Francisco, CA and in particular to children of such families, to provide referral services for such families and their children to other…

Human Services
3
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
4
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
5
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
6
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
7
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
8
Conservation Society of California

Through management of oakland zoo, the conservation society of california deepens connection with animals, saves wildlife, and inspires champions for the natural world.

Animals
9
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
10
Public Health Foundation Enterprises Inc

To enhance the health, wellness, and resilience of every community we serve - see schedule o for more details

—
11
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
12
Global Strategies

Global Strategies empowers communities in the most neglected areas of the world to improve the lives of women and children through healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Beyond Borders; the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF THE BAY: $125,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF THE BAYRICHMOND DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $125,000 · OtherRICHMOND DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INCMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $125,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INCSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF SV: $125,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF SVAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $50,000 · OtherAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC+1 more: $10,000 · OtherRICHMOND AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC: $125,000 · HealthRICHMOND AREA MULTI-S…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $125,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FE…WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $125,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE CONSERVATION…Humane World for Animals Inc: $125,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Anim…MERCY BEYOND BORDERS: $125,000 · InternationalMERCY BEYO…MAUI UNITED WAY: $115,000 · PhilanthropyMAUI UNIT…Children of the Night: $20,000 · Human Services
Other$560,000Health$250,000Animals$250,000International$125,000Philanthropy$115,000Human Services$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRICHMOND DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRICHMOND AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMERCY BEYOND BORDERS: $125,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI UNITED WAY: $115,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren of the Night: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David B Costa Private Foundation Uad 030222 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David B Costa Private Foundation Uad 030222. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on David B Costa Private Foundation Uad 030222’s filings →

    More from the funding graph