Skip to content

· Private foundation

David & Mary Slikkers Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$143k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$58k
Largest
01What it funds
0170% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$711kHealth$65kEducation$23kScience & Tech$21kInternational$15kAnimals$15kPhilanthropy$7kRecreation & Sports$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$307k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IN DISCIPLESHIP$58,000
IT IS WRITTEN$22,500
Individual grant recipient$17,000
ADVENTIST FRONTIER MISSIONS$15,000
VAN ANDEL INSTITUTE$15,000
VARIOUS$5,075
Individual grant recipient$5,000
OUTDOOR DISCOVERY CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PIONEER RESOURCES: $500 → 15%PROJECT DOVE: $500 → 20%HEALTHNETWORK: $3k → 17%HEALTHNETWORK: $2k → 17%BENJAMINS HOPE: $500 → 8%HEALTHNETWORK: $1k → 17%BENJAMINS HOPE: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
TN
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 18 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +51% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
27

Total granted

$1.0M
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+51%

Still filing today

33%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsEnvironmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2022 · $7k · revenue +90%
  • HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $6k · revenue +183%
  • MT
    MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2023 · $1k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • WS
    WILL STRONG FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • HO
    HOLLAND OZ PROJECT
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • RG
    RUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
2
The Montana Land Reliance

The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.

Environment
3
Conservation Minnesota

Conservation minnesota's mission is to turn our shared conservation values into state priorities and provide you with the information you need to make decisions for your family, community and future.

Environment
4
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
5
Coalition to Protect Michigan Resources

The coalition to protect michigan resources's mission is to be a strong voice for the equitable co-management of michigan's fisheries, with both the great lakes and inland lakes and streams, to insure that conservation principles remain in…

Environment
6
Legacy Disciple

Legacy disciple organizes conferences to encourage, equip and empower everyday christians to be disciples who make disciples for christ. we accomplish this mission through creative conferences, quality content and broad collaboration.

Religion
7
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
8
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
9
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
10
Minnesota Land Trust

The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.

Environment
11
Intentional Life Media

Dedicated to igniting personal transformation by affirming faith, inspiring hope, and equipping individuals, to live an intentional life in christ.

Religion
12
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lakeshore Pregnancy Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kings Heralds Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MICHIGAN CONFERENCE OF SDA: $470,000 · OtherMICHIGAN CONFERENCE OF SDAIndividual grant recipient: $160,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOLLAND SDA CHURCH: $131,100 · OtherHOLLAND SDA CHURCHAU TRAUMA CENTER: $50,000 · OtherAU TRAUMA CENTER+31 more: $106,264 · Other+31 moreIN DISCIPLESHIP CORP: $83,000 · ReligionIT IS WRITTEN INC: $22,500 · PhilanthropyVAN ANDEL INSTITUTE: $20,500 · Philanthropy+2 more: $1,500 · PhilanthropyADVENTIST FRONTIER MISSIONS INC: $15,000 · InternationalWILD SHEEP FOUNDATION: $7,100 · AnimalsODC NETWORK: $5,000 · AnimalsHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesBENJAMIN'S HOPE: $1,000 · Human ServicesProject DOVE: $500 · Human ServicesPIONEER RESOURCES: $500 · Human ServicesCONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthLAKESHORE PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $200 · Health
Other$918,064Religion$83,000Philanthropy$44,500International$15,000Animals$12,100Human Services$8,000Health$1,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIN DISCIPLESHIP CORP: $83,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetVAN ANDEL INSTITUTE: $20,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILD SHEEP FOUNDATION: $7,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetODC NETWORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBENJAMIN'S HOPE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetProject DOVE: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAUGATUCK DUNES COASTAL ALLIANCE: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINGENFELTER FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLAKESHORE PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IN DISCIPLESHIP CORP ↗
  • Who funds IT IS WRITTEN INC ↗
  • Who funds VAN ANDEL INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ADVENTIST FRONTIER MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ODC NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds CONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BENJAMIN'S HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Project DOVE ↗
  • Who funds SAUGATUCK DUNES COASTAL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds KINGS HERALDS INC ↗
  • Who funds PIONEER RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds MOVEMBER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jim and Ginger Jurries FoundationMI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jim and Ginger Jurries Foundation · Douglas & Sandra Dekock Family Foun · John and Judy Spoelhof Foundation · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Slikkers Foundation · Marvin G & Jerene L Dewitt Family Foundation · De Witt Families Conduit Foundation · The Samuel L Westerman Foundation · Edgar and Elsa Prince Foundation · Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · Craig and Wendy Spoelhof Foundation · Merle & Sheri Dewitt Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David & Mary Slikkers Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David & Mary Slikkers Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 85%
  • Project Dove: 85% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to David & Mary Slikkers Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to David & Mary Slikkers Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David & Mary Slikkers Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph