Skip to content

· Private foundation

David & Mary Anderson Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$167k
Granted FY2020
13
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Education$387kFood & Nutrition$104kPhilanthropy$75kArts & Culture$45kHuman Services$35kCrime & Legal$30kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kReligion$21kOther$0
02FY2020 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k4 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $148k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$25,000
NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE$20,000
BRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES$20,000
MADISON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
MINNESOTA LITERACY COUNCIL$18,000
UNIVERSITY OF MN FOUNDATION$15,000
URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
WISCONSIN CENTER FOR NURSING$10,000
EDGEWOOD COLLEGE$9,604
MADISON WEST ATHLETIC BOOSTER ASSOCIATION$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,500
ROSEVILLE AREA SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$582k · 13 repeat orgs$215k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against -8% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2020, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
14

Total granted

$582k
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
-8%

Still filing today

54%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
EducationCrime & LegalArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $231k · revenue +39%
  • LM
    LITERACY MINNESOTA
    4× · 2017–2020 · $56k · revenue +30%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $50k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST
    one grant, 2017 · $72k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES MADISON
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • AW
    AMIGOS - WI CHAPTER
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
2
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
3
State University of Iowa Foundation

The university of iowa center for advancement's mission is to advance the university of iowa through engagement and philanthropy. we serve our alumni and friends in the state and the region, throughout the country, and around the world. we…

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement
6
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
7
United Way of Ne Minnesota

United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.

—
8
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
9
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
10
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
11
Twin Cities Diversity in Practice

To attract, recruit, advance, and retain attorneys of color in the twin cities through education and collaboration with member organizations.

Community Improvement
12
University of Minnesota Alumni Association

The university of minnesota alumni association (umaa) fosters a lifelong spirit of belonging and pride by connecting alumni, students, and friends to the university of minnesota and each other. the alumni association advocates for the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Twin Cities United Way; the most unlike its peers is Coffee House Press Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $231,140 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATIONLITERACY MINNESOTA: $55,500 · EducationLITERACY MINNESOTAUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONEDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC: $39,604 · EducationEDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC+1 more: $5,000 · EducationSECOND HARVEST: $71,747 · OtherSECOND HARVESTUNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INC: $54,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INCAGRACE: $32,000 · OtherAGRACECOFFEE HOUSE PRESS INC: $25,000 · OtherCOFFEE HOUSE PRESS INCIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATHOLIC CHARITIES MADISON: $25,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES MADISONAMERICAN RED CROSS: $25,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSMWABA: $20,025 · OtherMWABAIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+12 more: $37,804 · Other+12 moreNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE: $20,000 · Crime & LegalBRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES INC: $20,000 · Crime & LegalMADISON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $1,000 · PhilanthropyWISCONSIN CENTER FOR NURSING INC: $19,000 · Arts & CultureURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $10,000 · Civil Rights
Education$381,244Other$335,576Crime & Legal$40,000Philanthropy$21,000Arts & Culture$19,000Human Services$10,000Civil Rights$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $231,140 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLITERACY MINNESOTA: $55,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INC: $54,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC: $39,604 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOFFEE HOUSE PRESS INC: $25,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMADISON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWISCONSIN CENTER FOR NURSING INC: $19,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST ATHLETIC BOOSTERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds COFFEE HOUSE PRESS INC ↗
  • Who funds MADISON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE ↗
  • Who funds BRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN CENTER FOR NURSING INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds WEST ATHLETIC BOOSTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI11.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David & Mary Anderson Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David & Mary Anderson Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to David & Mary Anderson Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to David & Mary Anderson Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on David & Mary Anderson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph