Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

David & Margery Inkeles Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$46k
Granted FY2021
26
Grants FY2021
7
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

74% of David & Margery Inkeles Charitable Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Of New Jersey, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 13 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year David & Margery Inkeles Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $46k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
17
12
18
15
19
14
20
13
21
8
22
13
23
13
24
13
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$1.8MEducation$147kHealth$44kHuman Services$30kEmployment$19kInternational$17kHousing & Shelter$15kAnimals$11kYouth Development$7kOther$406k
02FY2021 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k25 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,003
Median grant
7
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT SELF SUFFICIENCY$10,000
SCARC FOUNDATION$5,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$2,542
OGALA LAKOTA COLLEGE$2,400
NEWTON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$2,002
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METRO$2,001
PETER VALLEY SCHOOL$2,000
ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE$2,000
KAREN ANN QUINLAN HOSPICE$2,000
BLAIR ACADEMY$2,000
MORISTOWN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,004
ST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$1,003
MT PLEASANT ANIMAL SHELTER$1,001
ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%SCARC FOUNDATION: $7k → 6%SCARC FOUNDATION: $7k → 6%SCARC FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%SCARC FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%SCARC FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%SCARC FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%SCARC FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%SCARC FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
MT
NY
SD
PA
NJ
CT
MO
VA
MD
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$683k · 31 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2021, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
16

Total granted

$683k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+106%

Still filing today

48%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesEmploymentInternationalAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BLAIR ACADEMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $129k · revenue +42%
  • SF
    SCARC FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +23%
  • NM
    NEWTON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • MH
    MONTEFIORE HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • SI
    SAMARITAN INCC
    one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Saratoga Care Inc

To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

Health
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

10
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
12
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Metrowest Nj and the most unlike its peers is Paralyzed Veterans of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr18%19%20–35yr14%33%35–55yr11%48%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr18%8%20–35yr14%31%35–55yr11%61%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
12%
6,333/52,269

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY — $1,795,081 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY+1 more — $10,500 · PhilanthropyPROJECT SELF SUFFICIENCY — $226,650 · OtherPROJECT SELF SUFFIC…YALE UNIVERSITY — $27,757 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYNEWTON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $22,227 · OtherALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE — $15,000 · Other+34 more — $146,770 · Other+34 moreBLAIR ACADEMY — $129,000 · EducationOGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGE — $16,900 · Education+1 more — $1,500 · EducationALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $11,500 · HealthFoundation for Morristown Medical Center — $11,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $10,500 · HealthPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $10,300 · Health+1 more — $500 · HealthSCARC FOUNDATION INC — $28,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $2,104 · Human ServicesPETERS VALLEY SCHOOL OF CRAFT INC — $19,266 · EmploymentMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $16,750 · International
Philanthropy$1,805,581Other$438,404Education$147,400Health$43,800Human Services$30,104Employment$19,266International$16,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY — $1,795,081 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBLAIR ACADEMY — $129,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSCARC FOUNDATION INC — $28,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetNEWTON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $22,227 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetPETERS VALLEY SCHOOL OF CRAFT INC — $19,266 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetOGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGE — $16,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $16,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN INN INC — $14,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $11,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMT PLEASANT ANIMAL SHELTER INC — $11,001 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFoundation for Morristown Medical Center — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $10,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ — $10,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $10,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSPARTA PAL INC — $6,500 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $2,104 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIlisagvik College — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY
  • Who funds BLAIR ACADEMY
  • Who funds SCARC FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds NEWTON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PETERS VALLEY SCHOOL OF CRAFT INC
  • Who funds OGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGE
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds SAMARITAN INN INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds MT PLEASANT ANIMAL SHELTER INC
  • Who funds Foundation for Morristown Medical Center
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds SPARTA PAL INC
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds Ilisagvik College

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization David & Margery Inkeles Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Samaritan Inn Inc0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
  • Blair Academy0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to David & Margery Inkeles Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to David & Margery Inkeles Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph