Skip to content

· Private foundation

David & Gusta Rosenberg Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$731k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.3MEducation$1.2MReligion$916kHuman Services$117kArts & Culture$56kInternational$14kHealth$5kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $566k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Dallas Jewish Community Foundations$200,000
Dallas Area torah Association$165,000
Torah Day School of Dallas$125,000
Jewish Federation of Greater Dallas$76,000
Ner Israel Rabbinical college$27,500
Mesivta Yeshiva Chaim Berlin$20,000
keren olam hatorah$18,000
Congregation Ohr Hatorah$17,500
Yeshivas Toras Chaim Denver$17,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$6,500
Texas torah Institute$5,000
Beth Medrash Govoha$5,000
American Friends of Mercaz Hatorah$5,000
Maayan Academy inc$4,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%American Friends of Yad Eliezer: $1k → 11%American Friends of Yad Eliezer: $1k → 11%American Friends of Yad Eliezer: $1k → 11%american friends of yad eliezer: $1k → 11%American Friends of Yad Eliezer: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
OH
NJ
CA
CO
MD
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 33 repeat orgs$185k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
24

Total granted

$2.3M
$163k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+45%

Still filing today

30%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MESORAH HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $664k · revenue +162% · 38% of their budget
  • TD
    TORAH DAY SCHOOL OF DALLAS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $525k · revenue +39%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERCAZ HATORAH INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $16k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • DH
    Dallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museumgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +52%
  • NI
    Ner Israel Rabbinical college
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DALLAS
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
2
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Sherit Isroel
—
5
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
6
Denver Academy of Torah

Denver academy of torah (the "school")provides education to students from kindergarten through high school. the school's mission is to nuture students to be torah-observant role models and future leaders through an intellectually rigorous…

Education
7
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
8
Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To provide religious Jewish education.

Education
9
Yeshiva Derech Torah of Monsey Inc

To provide children with an outstanding Jewish and Secular education.

Education
10
Bais Medrash Mayan Hatorah

To provide religious education and services to our students in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
11
Mesivta of Cleveland Dba Yeshivas Toras

Operation of an all male Religious Orthodox Jewish High School

Education
12
University of Judaism Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Yeshiva Dmir Inc; the most unlike its peers is State Fair of Texas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DALLAS JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $970,000 · PhilanthropyDALLAS JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $370,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLASMESORAH HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $663,500 · EducationMESORAH HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INCTORAH DAY SCHOOL OF DALLAS: $525,000 · EducationTORAH DAY SCHOOL OF DALLAS+4 more: $45,700 · EducationDALLAS TORAH INSTITUTE: $385,250 · OtherDALLAS TORAH INSTITUTEYeshivas Toras Chaim Denver: $107,000 · OtherYeshivas Toras Chaim DenverNER ISRAEL RABBINICAL COLLEGE INC: $102,500 · OtherNER ISRAEL RABBINICAL COLLEGE INCJewish Family Services: $100,000 · OtherJewish Family ServicesMesivta Yeshiva Chaim Berlin: $71,000 · OtherMesivta Yeshiva Chaim BerlinCongregation Ohr Hatorah: $55,750 · OtherMikvah Israel: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $42,500 · Other+37 more: $244,750 · Other+37 moreDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $50,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DALLAS: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsSTATE FAIR OF TEXAS: $1,500 · Recreation & SportsKOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM: $5,000 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $2,000 · InternationalAMIT CHILDREN INC: $1,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $5,000 · Human ServicesVaad Hakashrus of Dallas Inc: $2,500 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$1,340,000Education$1,234,200Other$1,158,750Arts & Culture$51,000Recreation & Sports$16,500International$8,500Human Services$5,000Food & Nutrition$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDALLAS JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $970,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetMESORAH HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $663,500 over 5y, 38% of budgetTORAH DAY SCHOOL OF DALLAS: $525,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $370,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERCAZ HATORAH INC: $16,200 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DALLAS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL OF DENVER: $14,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIGDAL TORAH INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMAAYAN ACADEMY INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF MEOR ISRAEL: $6,500 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetKOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVaad Hakashrus of Dallas Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE FAIR OF TEXAS: $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHERITAGE FOUNDATION FOR PRESERVATI- ON OF THE JEWISH CEMETERIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMIT CHILDREN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DALLAS JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MESORAH HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds TORAH DAY SCHOOL OF DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERCAZ HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIGDAL TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds MAAYAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MEOR ISRAEL ↗
  • Who funds KOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dallas Jewish Community FoundationTX21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dallas Jewish Community Foundation · The Jeff & Bonnie Whitman Charitable Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Margot Rosenberg Pulitzer Foundation · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation · Feinstein Family Foundation · Sylvan T Baer Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Dallas · Laurie and Todd Platt Family Charitable Foundation · Mb and Edna Zale Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David & Gusta Rosenberg Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David & Gusta Rosenberg Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to David & Gusta Rosenberg Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to David & Gusta Rosenberg Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on David & Gusta Rosenberg Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph