Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

David & Carol Anderson Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2020
19
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Religion$27kHuman Services$8kEducation$7kArts & Culture$5kEmployment$5kYouth Development$5kHealth$4kRecreation & Sports$100
02FY2020 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MATTHEWS LUTHERAN CHURCH$8,212
LIFE NAVIGATORS$3,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION WI$2,000
ST JOAN ANTIDA HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES$2,000
SUNSET PLAYHOUSE$1,000
LUTHER MANOR FOUNDATION$1,000
MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$750
OUTREACH FOR HOPE$500
MILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL CENTE$500
WHITEWATER FOUNDATION$500
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$500
MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING$500
SOJOURNER TRUTH HOUSE$300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SOJOURNER TRUTH HOUSE: $300 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$51k · 14 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2020, 5 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$51k
$500

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
EducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $3k · revenue +34%
  • UF
    UW-WHITEWATER FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $2k · revenue +3%
  • MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mathematics Institute of Wisconsin Co Kathryn Leverenz
Education
2
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
3
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
4
The University School of Milwaukee Corporation

University school of milwaukee cultivates excellence in learning, leadership, and citizenship for prekindergarten through 12th grade students. students are engaged, known, and valued within our passionate independent school community…

Education
5
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
6
Wisconsin Lutheran College Inc

Wisconsin lutheran college is a private, four-year liberal arts college.

7
University of Wisconsin Foundation

To promote the welfare of and advance the objectives of the university of wisconsin-madison by encouraging the interest, engagement, and financial support of alumni, donors, and friends in the life of the university and with each other.

Education
8
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

9
Alverno College

Alverno college prepares women for lives of personal and professional distinction and meaningful engagement with the world. alverno also extends this mission by offering graduate and adult programs to women and men.

Education
10
Milwaukee Excellence Inc

The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.

11
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
12
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sunset Playhouse Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST MATTHEWS LUTHERAN CHURCH — $25,588 · OtherST MATTHEWS LUTHERAN CHURCHGOODWILL INDUSTRIES — $5,000 · OtherGOODWILL INDUSTRIESPARTNERS WITH YOUTH INC — $5,000 · OtherPARTNERS WITH YOUTH INCLIFE NAVIGATORS INC — $3,000 · OtherLIFE NAVIGATORS INCMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION WI — $2,000 · OtherST JOAN ANTIDA HIGH SCHOOL INC — $2,000 · Other+10 more — $4,889 · Other+10 moreUW-WHITEWATER FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · EducationUW-WHITEW…MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING — $1,400 · EducationMILWAUKEE…Marquette University — $1,250 · EducationMarquette…PATHWAYS HIGH INC — $550 · EducationPATHWAYS …MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC — $2,800 · Arts & CultureSunset Playhouse Inc — $1,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC — $600 · Arts & CultureLUTHERAN MANOR FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 · HealthSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC — $300 · Human Services
Other$47,477Education$5,200Arts & Culture$4,400Health$4,000Human Services$300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPARTNERS WITH YOUTH INC — $5,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetLUTHERAN MANOR FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE NAVIGATORS INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC — $2,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUW-WHITEWATER FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING — $1,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMarquette University — $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSunset Playhouse Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPATHWAYS HIGH INC — $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARTNERS WITH YOUTH INC
  • Who funds LUTHERAN MANOR FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LIFE NAVIGATORS INC
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds UW-WHITEWATER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
  • Who funds Marquette University
  • Who funds Sunset Playhouse Inc
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC
  • Who funds PATHWAYS HIGH INC
  • Who funds SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Waukesha County Community Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization David & Carol Anderson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to David & Carol Anderson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to David & Carol Anderson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph