Skip to content

· Private foundation

David Abram Skier and Nan Goodman Skier Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$52kReligion$25kPhilanthropy$5kRecreation & Sports$1kEducation$290Food & Nutrition$225Health$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$91k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Temple Emanu-El$2,800
Foundation for Harmony Presents$1,000
Ashley Gibson Barnett Museum of Art$1,000
NJY Camps$1,000
The Birmingham Jewish Federation$550
Maranathan Academy$290
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Foundation for Harmony Presents: $1k → 9%NJY Camps: $1k → 16%The Foundation for Harmony Present: $1k → 9%The Foundation for Harmony Presents: $1k → 9%The Foundation for Harmony Presents: $1k → 9%Unless U: $100 → 16%The Foundation for Harmony Presents: $1k → 9%The Foundation for Harmony Presents: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$76k · 7 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$76k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+83%

Still filing today

29%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BM
    Birmingham Museum of Art
    5× · 2017–2021 · $43k
  • TE
    Temple Emanu-El
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k
  • FF
    Foundation for Harmony Presents
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • AG
    ASHLEY GIBSON BARNETT MUSEUM OF ART AT FLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +25%
  • TN
    The National Society of Arts & Letter
    one grant, 2018 · $103
  • DC
    DREAM COURT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100 · revenue +371%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mint Museum of Art Inc

The mint museum welcomes all to be inspired and transformed through the power of art and creativity.

Arts & Culture
2
United Federation of Artistic Minds
Arts & Culture
3
The Contemporary Jewish Museum

The contemporary jewish museum (the cjm) makes the diversity of the jewish experience relevant for a twenty-first-century audience through innovative exhibitions and programs that educate, challenge, and inspire.

Arts & Culture
4
The John & Mable Ringling Museum of Art Foundation Incorporated

The ringling is a place of art, architecture, and circus in an environment that inspires, educates, entertains, and honors the legacy of john & mable ringling.

Arts & Culture
5
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
6
Alabama Junior Miss Scholarship Fou

To fund college scholarships for participants in the distinguished young women of alabama program

—
7
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
8
Alabama Healthcare Hall of Fame
Arts & Culture
9
Beaux Arts Krewe

Fundraising to benefit the birmingham museum of art

—
10
Artis-Naples Inc

Please refer to schedule o for the organization's complete mission statement.

Arts & Culture
11
The Long Island Museum of American Art History & Carriages

The long island museum is dedicated to inspiring people of all ages with an understanding and enjoyment of american art, history and carriages as expressed through the heritage of long island and its diverse communities.

Arts & Culture
12
Birmingham Jewish Foundation Inc

The birmingham jewish foundation is dedicated to nurturing and promoting jewish life in birmingham, nationally, in israel and throughout the world; is involved in building a better birmingham through alliances and partnerships with other…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ashley Gibson Barnett Museum of Art At Florida Southern College Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bama Softball Walkoff Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Birmingham Museum of Art: $43,330 · OtherBirmingham Museum of ArtTemple Emanu-El: $24,100 · OtherTemple Emanu-El+7 more: $3,744 · OtherFoundation for Harmony Presents: $6,000 · Human ServicesFoundatio…NEW JERSEY FEDERATION OF YOUNG MEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND YOUNG WOMEN'S: $1,000 · Human ServicesNEW JERSE…+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesBIRMINGHAM JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $5,400 · PhilanthropyASHLEY GIBSON BARNETT MUSEUM OF ART AT FLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE INC: $1,250 · Arts & CultureMONTGOMERY MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION: $180 · Arts & CultureDREAM COURT INC: $100 · Recreation & SportsBAMA SOFTBALL WALKOFF CLUB INC: $50 · Recreation & Sports
Other$71,174Human Services$7,100Philanthropy$5,400Arts & Culture$1,430Recreation & Sports$150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFoundation for Harmony Presents: $6,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetBIRMINGHAM JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $5,400 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetASHLEY GIBSON BARNETT MUSEUM OF ART AT FLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW JERSEY FEDERATION OF YOUNG MEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND YOUNG WOMEN'S: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION: $180 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDREAM COURT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNLESS U INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAMA SOFTBALL WALKOFF CLUB INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Foundation for Harmony Presents ↗
  • Who funds BIRMINGHAM JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ASHLEY GIBSON BARNETT MUSEUM OF ART AT FLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW JERSEY FEDERATION OF YOUNG MEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND YOUNG WOMEN'S ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds DREAM COURT INC ↗
  • Who funds UNLESS U INC ↗
  • Who funds BAMA SOFTBALL WALKOFF CLUB INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David Abram Skier and Nan Goodman Skier Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David Abram Skier and Nan Goodman Skier Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on David Abram Skier and Nan Goodman Skier Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph