Skip to content
Daulat Singh Khamesra and Manorama Jain Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Daulat Singh Khamesra and Manorama Jain Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$5kReligion$3kAnimals$951Public Safety & Disaster$200International$200Housing & Shelter$100Human Services$38Other$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
6
States reached
$74k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UTSW MEDICAL CENTER$1,250
LUVIN ARMS ANIMAL SANCTUARY$200
SHRINERS CHILDREN'S$100
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$100
THE SALVATION ARMY$100
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$100
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$100
NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION$100
UNICEF USA$100
Individual grant recipient$100
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $200 → 9%JAIN SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS: $2k → 14%JAIN SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS: $665 → 14%JAIN SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS: $303 → 14%JAIN SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS: $65 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IA
CO
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9k · 11 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$9k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+22%

Still filing today

55%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JS
    JAIN SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS
    4× · 2018–2021 · $3k · revenue +205%
  • LA
    Luvin Arms
    3× · 2020–2025 · $500 · revenue +22%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $300 · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • SO
    SPCA of Texas
    one grant, 2018 · $350 · revenue +6%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2023 · $200 · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
4
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
5
Children's Hospital Colorado

To improve the health of children through the provision of high-quality, coordinated programs of patient care, education, research and advocacy.

Health
6
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
7
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
8
American Kidney Fund Inc

The mission of the american kidney fund is to fight kidney disease and help people live healthier lives. founded in 1971, akf fights kidney disease on all fronts with a comprehensive scope of programs that support people across the…

—
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
11
American Association of Kidney Patients Inc

AAKP is dedicated to improving the lives and long-term outcome of kidney patients. Cont on Sch O.

Health
12
The Heart Foundation

The heart foundation (thf) was created to save lives from heart disease by increasing awareness, educating the public, and supporting innovative research at smidt heart institute at cedars-sinai medical center in los angeles, california.…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shriners Hospitals for Children; the most unlike its peers is Luvin Arms. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UTSW MEDICAL CENTER: $3,550 · OtherUTSW MEDICAL CENTERYOUNG JAINS OF AMERICA: $600 · OtherYOUNG JAINS OF AMERICAIndividual grant recipient: $500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $300 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $200 · OtherUT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $200 · Other+3 more: $339 · Other+3 moreJAIN SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS: $2,737 · Human ServicesJAIN SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXASAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & I…Luvin Arms: $500 · AnimalsLuvin ArmsSPCA of Texas: $350 · AnimalsSPCA of Te…Wildlife Conservation Society: $101 · AnimalsWildlife C…American Heart Association Inc: $300 · HealthAmerican …ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $300 · HealthST JUDE C…National Kidney Foundation Inc: $200 · HealthNational …SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $100 · HealthSHRINERS …UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $200 · International
Other$5,689Human Services$2,937Animals$951Health$900International$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJAIN SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS: $2,737 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLuvin Arms: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA of Texas: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Daulat Singh Khamesra and Manorama Jain Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Daulat Singh Khamesra and Manorama Jain Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Daulat Singh Khamesra and Manorama Jain’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home