Skip to content

· Private foundation

Darragh Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$247k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$838kCrime & Legal$726kHealth$566kHousing & Shelter$294kEducation$271kArts & Culture$150kCommunity Improvement$43kYouth Development$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$212k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF A$100,000
ARKANSAS COMMUNITY INSTITUTE$40,000
AR ADVOCATES CHILDREN FAMILY$30,000
AIDING SURVIVORS OF HUMAN TRACKING$30,000
CENTRAL ARKANSAS LIBRARY FOUNDATION$20,000
PULASKI TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATIO$10,000
ARKANSAS PUBLIC LAW CENTER$9,124
AR BROADCASTING FOUNDATION$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AR UNITED COMMUNITY COALITION: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 20 repeat orgs$218k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
24

Total granted

$2.8M
$188k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+3%

Still filing today

30%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsHousing & ShelterHealthReligionEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $245k · revenue +82%
  • CA
    Central Arkansas Volunteers in Medicine Clinic Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $88k · revenue +123%
  • CW
    COMPASSION WORKS FOR ALL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $28k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • AA
    ARKANSAS ABORTION SUPPORT NETWORKgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +262%
  • AS
    AR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • AI
    ARKANSAS IMMIGRANT DEFENSE
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arkansas Appleseed Legal Justice Center

Arkansas Appleseed Justice Center is an advocacy organization launched in September 2021 to advance inclusive, collective, and systemic solutions to issues of equity, poverty, and justice facing Arkansans.

Civil Rights
2
Arkansas Nonprofit News Network

Producing journalism that matters to Arkansans.

Arts & Culture
3
Legal Aid of Arkansas

To provide legal assistance & housing counseling to the underprivileged citizens of north arkansas.

Crime & Legal
4
Arkansas Public Policy Panel Inc

Ar public policy panel is a statewide organization dedicated to achieving social and economic justice by organizing citizen groups around the state, educating and supporting them to be more effective and powerful, and linking them with one…

Environment
5
Northwest Arkansas Equality Inc

Northwest Arkansas Equalitys mission is to provide programming, education and advocacy to serve, connect, and empower the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer community.

Civil Rights
6
Urban League of the State of Arkansas Inc

To improve education youth development health and wellness in African American communities throughout the State of Arkansas

—
7
Central Arkansas Development Council

To provide services to low income individuals.

Community Improvement
8
Arkansas Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Provide help to domestic violence victims and encourage community efforts to promote domestic peace.

—
9
Arkansas Immunization Action Coalition

To provide education to the public in support of immunizations.

Health
10
Arkansas Coalition Against Sexual Assault

To serve as a collective voice to eliminate all forms of sexual violence and advocate for the rights and needs of individuals affected by sexual assault through program support, education, and social change.

Crime & Legal
11
Arkansas Community Organizations

Promote social and economic justice and welfare.

Community Improvement
12
Just Communities of Arkansas Inc

Building communities - through education, celebration, and advocacy

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Arkansas Volunteers in Medicine Clinic Inc; the most unlike its peers is Elaine Legacy Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF A: $765,000 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF AARKANSAS PUBLIC LAW CENTER: $394,672 · OtherARKANSAS PUBLIC LAW CENTERAR ADVOCATES CHILDREN FAMILY: $275,000 · OtherAR ADVOCATES CHILDREN FAMILYPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND: $225,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLANDPULASKI TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 · Other+30 more: $545,757 · Other+30 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $245,000 · HealthPLANNED PARE…Central Arkansas Volunteers in Medicine Clinic Inc: $87,500 · HealthCentral Arka…ARKANSAS COMMUNITY INSTITUTE: $258,600 · Housing & ShelterARKANSAS CO…Lucies Place Inc: $35,000 · Housing & ShelterLucies Plac…ARKANSAS ABORTION SUPPORT NETWORK: $30,000 · Civil RightsARKANSAS COALITION TO ABOLISH THE DEATH PENALTY INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsGET LOUD ARKANSAS: $2,500 · Civil RightsCOMPASSION WORKS FOR ALL: $27,500 · ReligionLITERACY ACTION OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS INC: $14,000 · EducationArkansas United: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$2,285,429Health$332,500Housing & Shelter$293,600Civil Rights$42,500Religion$27,500Education$14,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARKANSAS COMMUNITY INSTITUTE: $258,600 over 9y, 18% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $245,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCentral Arkansas Volunteers in Medicine Clinic Inc: $87,500 over 3y, 14% of budgetPULASKI TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetLucies Place Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetARKANSAS ABORTION SUPPORT NETWORK: $30,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCOMPASSION WORKS FOR ALL: $27,500 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetLITERACY ACTION OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS INC: $14,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetELAINE LEGACY CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBOYS GIRLS ADULTS COMM DEV CTR INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGET LOUD ARKANSAS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARKANSAS COMMUNITY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS ↗
  • Who funds Central Arkansas Volunteers in Medicine Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds PULASKI TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Lucies Place Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS ABORTION SUPPORT NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION WORKS FOR ALL ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY ACTION OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Arkansas United ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS COALITION TO ABOLISH THE DEATH PENALTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ELAINE LEGACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS GIRLS ADULTS COMM DEV CTR INC ↗
  • Who funds GET LOUD ARKANSAS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR29× affinity12 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Rebsamen Fund · Heart of Arkansas United Way · Southern Bancorp Capital Partners · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Darragh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Darragh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Darragh’s filings →

    More from the funding graph