Skip to content

· Private foundation

Daniel Spiegel Family Foundation co Paul Swanson

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$237kPublic Benefit$71kPhilanthropy$65kHealth$57kArts & Culture$30kCrime & Legal$16kCivil Rights$10kInternational$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $85k
$1,800
Median grant
4
States reached
$264k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Minneapolis Heart Institute$25,000
Museum of Jewish Heritage$15,000
Torah Academy$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Center for American Experiment$10,000
Mayo Clinic$5,000
Beth El$5,000
Bais Yisroel$4,000
Chabad Lubavitch of Montanta$1,800
Minneapolis Jewish Federation$1,800
Twin Cities PBS$1,000
Animal Humane Society$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Minneapolis Community Fund$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 24% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Mayo Clinic: $5k → 9%Center for American Experiment: $10k → 11%Chabad of Montana: $10k → 10%Chabad Grand Cayman: $10k → 12%Museum of Jewish Heritage: $15k → 17%Bais Chana Women International: $5k → 20%Samaritans Purse: $5k → 21%Chabad Grand Cayman: $10k → 12%Museum of Jewish Heritage: $6k → 17%Bais Chana Women International: $5k → 20%Friends of Chabad: $7k → 12%Bais Chana Women International: $5k → 20%Minneapolis Jewish Federation: $4k → 11%Chabad Grand Cayman: $5k → 12%American Jewish Communities: $10k → 17%St Paul and Minnesota Foundation: $25k → 14%JCC Film Fesival: $10k → 14%Center of the American Experiment: $35k → 11%Center of the American Experiment: $15k → 11%Center of the American Experiment: $10k → 11%Center of the American Experiment: $10k → 11%Minneapolis Heart Institute: $25k → 11%Minneapolis Heart Institute: $13k → 11%Minneapolis Heart Institute: $13k → 11%Minneapolis Heart Institute: $10k → 11%Minneapolis Heart Institute: $9k → 11%Minneapolis Heart Institute: $8k → 11%Minneapolis Jewish Federation: $30k → 11%Torah Academy: $26k → 11%Bais Yaakov: $17k → 11%Beth El: $16k → 11%Torah Academy: $15k → 11%Beth El: $15k → 11%Torah Academy: $15k → 11%Bais Yaakov: $11k → 11%Torah Academy: $10k → 11%Beth El: $10k → 11%Yeshiva of Minneapolis: $10k → 11%Congregation Bais Yisroel: $9k → 11%Beth El: $8k → 11%Torah Academy: $7k → 11%Torah Academy: $7k → 11%Torah Academy: $5k → 11%Beth El: $5k → 11%Yeshiva of Minneapolis: $5k → 11%Beth El Synagogue: $4k → 11%Bais Yisroel: $4k → 11%Congregation Basi Yisroel: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
IL
NY
PA
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$541k · 43 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 36 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
26

Total granted

$541k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+68%

Still filing today

30%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationCivil RightsCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    Center of the American Experiment
    5× · 2017–2022 · $71k · revenue +105%
  • MO
    MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST
    2× · 2023–2025 · $21k · revenue +1%
  • BC
    BAIS CHANA WOMEN INTERNATIONAL INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $15k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +68%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • LS
    Leukemia Society
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Historical Society of the Upper Midwest

The purpose of the society is to promote the vitality and continuity of jewish culture in the upper midwest through preservation, interpretation and education.

—
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas

As the voice of the jewish community, to protect jewish interests & promote jewish ideals.

—
4
Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Mitchell hamline school of law is an independent law school that advances its mission through a combination of legal education, public service, and community engagement. it is dedicated to preparing students to practice law, while also…

Education
5
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
6
Minnesota Women Lawyers

To advance the success of women attorneys and strive for a just society.

—
7
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
8
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

(see on schedule o)

Arts & Culture
9
Mesorah Heritage Foundation

The foundation's mission is to research, locate, translate, and create jewish religious, literary, biblical, and talmudic works for religious, scholarly and cultural purposes for the general public.

Arts & Culture
10
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
11
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
12
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minneapolis Jewish Federation; the most unlike its peers is Living Legacy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
20/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TORAH ACADEMY OF MINNEAPOLIS: $90,743 · OtherTORAH ACADEMY OF MINNEAPOLISMinneapolis Heart Institute: $76,000 · OtherMinneapolis Heart InstituteBeth El: $55,580 · OtherBeth ElBais Yaakov: $34,600 · OtherBais YaakovIndividual grant recipient: $28,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYESHIVA OF MINNEAPOLIS: $20,250 · Other+60 more: $175,193 · Other+60 moreCenter of the American Experiment: $71,200 · Youth DevelopmentCenter of t…MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $40,800 · PhilanthropyMINNEAPOLI…SAINT PAUL & MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropySAINT PAUL…+1 more: $750 · PhilanthropyMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $20,925 · Arts & CultureBAIS CHANA WOMEN INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureThe Minnesota Opera: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $2,915 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $10,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $250 · Civil RightsMAYO CLINIC: $5,000 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $3,800 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $6,500 · Religion
Other$480,366Youth Development$71,200Philanthropy$66,550Arts & Culture$43,840Civil Rights$10,250Health$8,800Religion$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCenter of the American Experiment: $71,200 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $40,800 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT PAUL & MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $20,925 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBAIS CHANA WOMEN INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAISH MINNESOTA: $5,400 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetThe Minnesota Opera: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $3,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER MIDWEST LAW CENTER: $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FUND FOR LEGAL AID: $2,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $1,360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA: $1,225 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGuild: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ISRAEL PROJECT: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Humane Society: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHA ARIM INC: $786 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIVING LEGACY: $750 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetMINNESOTA HILLEL: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA VOTERS ALLIANCE: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Center of the American Experiment ↗
  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds SAINT PAUL & MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST ↗
  • Who funds BAIS CHANA WOMEN INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds AISH MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds The Minnesota Opera ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds UPPER MIDWEST LAW CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN25.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Minneapolis Jewish Federation · Mike & Linda Fiterman Family Foundation · Ks Family Foundation · Marshall & Elaine Siegel Foundation · Tamar Fink Family Foundation · The Lynn and Gloria Johnson Family Foundation · Allan and Margaret Moore Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Beryl and Florence Miller Family Foundation · The Z S & M Wilf Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Daniel Spiegel Family Foundation co Paul Swanson funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Daniel Spiegel Family Foundation co Paul Swanson. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Daniel Spiegel Family Foundation co Paul Swanson?

    Find your warmest path to Daniel Spiegel Family Foundation co Paul Swanson through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Daniel Spiegel Family Foundation co Paul Swanson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph