Skip to content

· Private foundation

Daniel M Soref Rvoc Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$365k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$5.1MYouth Development$4.0MPhilanthropy$3.6MArts & Culture$3.5MHealth$2.7MHuman Services$2.6MReligion$1.9MFood & Nutrition$1.2MOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $632k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+3 grants · $865k
$36,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$70M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC$365,000
HISTORIC HAYMARKET MILWAUKEE LLC$250,000
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN$250,000
MILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC$200,000
CONGREGATION EMANUEL B'NE JESHURUN$195,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SYS FDN$175,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE$125,000
HUNGER TASK FORCE INC$100,000
RUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION$100,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF METRO MILW$100,000
ACTS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$80,000
CITY FORWARD COLLECTIVE INC$75,000
COA YOUTH & FAMILY CENTERS$75,000
HILLEL FOUNDATION - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON$70,000
GREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION$55,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE: $8k → 17%HARRY & ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JCC: $438k → 17%HARRY & ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JCC: $323k → 17%HARRY & ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JCC: $213k → 17%HARRY & ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JCC: $188k → 17%HARRY & ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JCC: $25k → 17%HARRY & ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JCC: $25k → 17%HARRY & ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JCC: $25k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $50k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $50k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $50k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $50k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $50k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $50k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $50k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $50k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $50k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $53k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $40k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $40k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $40k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $40k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $40k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $40k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $40k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $40k → 17%AFAR INC: $25k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $93k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $93k → 17%SHARP LITERACY: $50k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $36k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $36k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $36k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $36k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $36k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $36k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $36k → 17%SHARP LITERACY: $25k → 17%SHARP LITERACY: $25k → 17%SHARP LITERACY: $25k → 17%SHARP LITERACY: $25k → 17%SHARP LITERACY: $25k → 17%SHARP LITERACY: $25k → 17%SHARP LITERACY: $25k → 17%SHARP LITERACY: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$25M · 67 repeat orgs$415k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

67 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

67
9

Total granted

$25M
$325k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+23%

Still filing today

61%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +54%
  • THE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +24%
  • BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • PS
    PAVE SCHOOLS THAT CAN MILWAUKEE
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • UF
    UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF MILWAUKEE
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University School of Milwaukee Corporation

University school of milwaukee cultivates excellence in learning, leadership, and citizenship for prekindergarten through 12th grade students. students are engaged, known, and valued within our passionate independent school community…

Education
2
Milwaukee Excellence Inc

The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.

—
3
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
4
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
5
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
6
Nonprofit Center of Milwaukee Inc

To promote interests and effectiveness of the nonprofit sector through strengthening organizational capacity, expanding volunteerism and encouraging collaboration.

—
7
Central City Cyberschool of Milwaukee Inc

A charter school providing motivation to inner city children to promote a successful future

Education
8
Milwaukee Bar Association Inc

The mission of the milwaukee bar association is to be an inclusive, equitable and diverse organization that serves the interests of the lawyers, judges and the people of milwaukee county by working to promote the professional interests of…

—
9
Milwaukee County War Memorial Inc

The war memorial center's mission is to honor the dead and serve the living. we commemorate the courageous men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of freedom while preserving and sharing the stories, experiences, and…

Arts & Culture
10
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

—
11
Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce

Improve metro milwaukee as a place to create jobs, invest capital and grow business.

—
12
Milwaukee Water Commons Inc

Milwaukee water commons is helping catalyze milwaukee as a true model water city-a place where we all have a stake in the health of our waters and all share in their stewardship and benefits. we are advancing our community envisioned water…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Forward Collective Inc; the most unlike its peers is Growing Minds Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/51
Grantees still filing
34/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $1,014,992 · OtherHUNGER TASK FORCE INCHarry Rose Samson Family JCC: $875,000 · OtherHarry Rose Samson Family JCCCONGREGATION EMANU-EL BNE JESHURUN: $840,000 · OtherCONGREGATION EMANU-EL BNE JESHURUNCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SYS FDN: $800,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SYS FDNTECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $625,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF METRO MILW: $600,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION: $575,000 · OtherTECHNION-ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNO: $499,584 · OtherMILWAUKEE JEWISH DAY SCHOOL INC: $480,000 · OtherHILLEL FOUNDATION UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN INC: $476,700 · Other+43 more: $6,061,560 · Other+43 moreTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $2,273,242 · EducationTHE MEDICAL CO…CITY FORWARD COLLECTIVE INC: $725,000 · EducationCITY FORWARD C…MCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC: $220,000 · EducationMCPREPARATORY …THE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $141,500 · Education+3 more: $310,000 · Education+3 moreMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $2,546,500 · PhilanthropyMILWAUKEE JEW…GREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION INC: $520,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER MILWA…UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $330,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF…MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $1,050,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE P…Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc: $1,000,000 · Arts & CultureHistoric Ha…MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $278,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE A…GPS EDUCATION PARTNERS INC: $160,000 · Arts & CultureGPS EDUCATI…ARTS AT LARGE INC: $158,000 · Arts & CultureARTS AT LAR…SKYLIGHT MUSIC THEATRE CORP: $105,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $145,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE: $1,235,000 · Human ServicesTHE HARRY A…UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $450,000 · Human ServicesUNITED COMM…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $438,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMI…SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $372,500 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER F…SHARP LITERACY INC: $250,000 · Human ServicesSHARP LITER…+2 more: $33,233 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $1,150,000 · Youth DevelopmentRUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC: $600,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentROGERS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $502,700 · HealthFroedtert Hospital Foundation Inc: $272,384 · Health
Other$12,847,836Education$3,669,742Philanthropy$3,396,500Arts & Culture$2,896,000Human Services$2,778,733Youth Development$1,770,000Health$775,084

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $2,546,500 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $2,273,242 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE: $1,235,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $1,150,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $1,050,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $1,014,992 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee Inc: $1,000,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCITY FORWARD COLLECTIVE INC: $725,000 over 6y, 6.8% of budgetRUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC: $600,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION: $575,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetGREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION INC: $520,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetROGERS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $502,700 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH DAY SCHOOL INC: $480,000 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetHILLEL FOUNDATION UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN INC: $476,700 over 8y, 6.9% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $450,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $438,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $372,500 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $330,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $278,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFroedtert Hospital Foundation Inc: $272,384 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetSHARP LITERACY INC: $250,000 over 9y, 6.3% of budgetThe Guest House of Milwaukee Inc: $230,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetWISCONSIN PHILANTHROPY NETWORK INC: $225,000 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED: $225,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetHILLEL MILWAUKEE: $220,000 over 8y, 9.6% of budgetMCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC: $220,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $195,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBENEDICT CENTER INC: $180,000 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC: $178,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetGPS EDUCATION PARTNERS INC: $160,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetARTS AT LARGE INC: $158,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetSCHOOLS THAT CAN MILWAUKEE INC: $150,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetOPERATION DREAM INC: $150,000 over 6y, 6.6% of budgetTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $141,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDISCOVERY WORLD LTD: $115,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetREPAIRERS OF THE BREACH INC: $106,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetALVERNO COLLEGE: $105,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSKYLIGHT MUSIC THEATRE CORP: $105,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetYESHIVA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - MILWAUKEE INC: $90,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $85,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE KOLLEL INC: $70,000 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetRADIO MILWAUKEE INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetKNOW THYSELF INC: $60,000 over 3y, 31% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF MILWAUKEE: $50,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetNEAR WEST SIDE PARTNERS INC: $32,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE NORTH SHORE LIBRARY: $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetMILWAUKEE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAFAR INC DBA THE ABILITY CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc ↗
  • Who funds CITY FORWARD COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds RUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROGERS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE JEWISH DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL FOUNDATION UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds Froedtert Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHARP LITERACY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Guest House of Milwaukee Inc ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN PHILANTHROPY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL MILWAUKEE ↗
  • Who funds MCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Herbert H Kohl Charities IncWI60.3× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Anon Charitable Trust · Harri Hoffmann Family Foundation Inc · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Gardner Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Daniel M Soref Rvoc Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Daniel M Soref Rvoc Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Daniel M Soref Rvoc Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph