Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

Daniel M & Wilma T Horner Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$35k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
7
Grants FY2025
8
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$5,420
Organizations funded a year
3 to 9
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
3
Total assets, FY2025
$682k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Daniel M & Wilma T Horner Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving7$35k0%
FY20248$30k0%
FY20233$35k0%
FY20229$38k11%
FY20219$33k56%
FY20205$37k20%
FY20197$37k14%
FY20187$36k57%
95% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$129kArts & Culture$65kEnvironment$27kPublic Safety & Disaster$24kReligion$18kAnimals$16kHealth$14kFood & Nutrition$11kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Plus 12 recipients with no EIN on record ($155k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Daniel M & Wilma T Horner Foundation with peer funders

About Daniel M & Wilma T Horner Foundation

How much does Daniel M & Wilma T Horner Foundation give?
Daniel M & Wilma T Horner Foundation reported 7 grants totaling $35,420 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 9 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Daniel M & Wilma T Horner Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (39%), Arts & Culture (20%), Environment (8%).
Who are Daniel M & Wilma T Horner Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Lehigh University ($57k), Shipley School ($37k), Harrisburg Academy ($35k).
Does Daniel M & Wilma T Horner Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Daniel M & Wilma T Horner Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Daniel M & Wilma T Horner Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Daniel M & Wilma T Horner Foundation based?
Daniel M & Wilma T Horner Foundation is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Daniel M & Wilma T Horner’s filings →

More from the funding graph